BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27442916)

  • 1. Minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.
    Fazl Alizadeh R; Stamos MJ
    Minerva Chir; 2016 Oct; 71(5):311-21. PubMed ID: 27442916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oncologic and Clinicopathologic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
    Pai A; Marecik SJ; Park JJ; Melich G; Sulo S; Prasad LM
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jul; 58(7):659-67. PubMed ID: 26200680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Robot-assisted rectal surgery: hype or progress?].
    Becker T; Egberts JE; Schafmayer C; Aselmann H
    Chirurg; 2016 Jul; 87(7):567-72. PubMed ID: 27334630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Abdominoperineal Resections in Patients With Rectal Cancer.
    Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Phelan M; Smith BR; Stamos MJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Dec; 58(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 26544808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic review analysis of robotic and transanal approaches in TME surgery- A systematic review of the current literature in regard to challenges in rectal cancer surgery.
    Grass JK; Perez DR; Izbicki JR; Reeh M
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Apr; 45(4):498-509. PubMed ID: 30470529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sun XY; Xu L; Lu JY; Zhang GN
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2019 Jun; 28(3):135-142. PubMed ID: 30688139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Controversies in Surgical Oncology: Does the Minimally Invasive Approach for Rectal Cancer Provide Equivalent Oncologic Outcomes Compared with the Open Approach?
    Cleary RK; Morris AM; Chang GJ; Halverson AL
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 25(12):3587-3595. PubMed ID: 30187281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic and minimally invasive resection of malignant colorectal disease.
    Koopmann MC; Heise CP
    Surg Clin North Am; 2008 Oct; 88(5):1047-72, vii. PubMed ID: 18790154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive colorectal surgery: status and technical specifications.
    Keller DS; Ibarra S; Haas EM
    Minerva Chir; 2015 Oct; 70(5):373-80. PubMed ID: 26149521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of laparoscopy for locally advanced rectal cancer.
    Petrucciani N; Martínez-Pérez A; Bianchi G; Memeo R; Brunetti F; De' Angelis N
    Minerva Chir; 2018 Feb; 73(1):77-92. PubMed ID: 29243454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of complication and conversion rates between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer: which patients and providers could benefit most from robotic-assisted surgery?
    Ackerman SJ; Daniel S; Baik R; Liu E; Mehendale S; Tackett S; Hellan M
    J Med Econ; 2018 Mar; 21(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 29065737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection: is there any real difference? A comparative single center study.
    Ielpo B; Caruso R; Quijano Y; Duran H; Diaz E; Fabra I; Oliva C; Olivares S; Ferri V; Ceron R; Plaza C; Vicente E
    Int J Med Robot; 2014 Sep; 10(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 24692203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.
    Wells KO; Peters WR
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2019 Apr; 28(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 30851830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Current status of laparoscopy for the treatment of rectal cancer.
    Shussman N; Wexner SD
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 20(41):15125-34. PubMed ID: 25386061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Challenges with robotic low anterior resection.
    Formisano G; Marano A; Bianchi PP; Spinoglio G
    Minerva Chir; 2015 Oct; 70(5):341-54. PubMed ID: 26091139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Update on Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches for Rectal Cancer.
    Garcia LE; Taylor J; Atallah C
    Curr Oncol Rep; 2021 Aug; 23(10):117. PubMed ID: 34342706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
    de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery - Present and Future Trends.
    Stănciulea O; Eftimie M; Moşteanu I; Tivadar B; Blăniţă D; Popescu I
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2019; 114(2):167-173. PubMed ID: 31060648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between robotic, laparoscopic, and open rectal cancer surgery: early experience at a tertiary care center.
    Ramji KM; Cleghorn MC; Josse JM; MacNeill A; O'Brien C; Urbach D; Quereshy FA
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1337-43. PubMed ID: 26173546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.