377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27443362)
1. Evaluating the Surface Characteristics of Stainless Steel, TMA, Timolium, and Titanium-niobium Wires: An in vivo Scanning Electron Microscope Study.
Babu KP; Keerthi VN; Madathody D; Prasanna AL; Gopinath V; Kumar MS; Kumar AN
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 May; 17(5):372-6. PubMed ID: 27443362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative evaluation of metallurgical properties of stainless steel and TMA archwires with timolium and titanium niobium archwires--an in vitro study.
Vijayalakshmi RD; Nagachandran KS; Kummi P; Jayakumar P
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):448-52. PubMed ID: 20139569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparisons of surface roughnesses and sliding resistances of 6 titanium-based or TMA-type archwires.
Kusy RP; Whitley JQ; de Araújo Gurgel J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Nov; 126(5):589-603. PubMed ID: 15520692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical properties and surface characteristics of three archwire alloys.
Krishnan V; Kumar KJ
Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):825-31. PubMed ID: 15673147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Resistance to sliding of orthodontic archwires under increasing applied moments.
Youssef A; Dennis C; Beyer JP; Grünheid T
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2020; 18():2280800020968027. PubMed ID: 33264051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of the static and kinetic frictional resistance of titanium molybdenum alloy archwires in stainless steel brackets.
Cash A; Curtis R; Garrigia-Majo D; McDonald F
Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 14994890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In-vitro evaluation of the material characteristics of stainless steel and beta-titanium orthodontic wires.
Verstrynge A; Van Humbeeck J; Willems G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):460-70. PubMed ID: 17045145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of ceramic and stainless steel brackets on the notching of archwires during clinical treatment.
Articolo LC; Kusy K; Saunders CR; Kusy RP
Eur J Orthod; 2000 Aug; 22(4):409-25. PubMed ID: 11029830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of galvanic corrosion potential of metal injection molded brackets to that of conventional metal brackets with nickel-titanium and copper nickel-titanium archwire combinations.
Varma DP; Chidambaram S; Reddy KB; Vijay M; Ravindranath D; Prasad MR
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):488-95. PubMed ID: 24171995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of intraoral aging on surface properties of coated nickel-titanium archwires.
Rongo R; Ametrano G; Gloria A; Spagnuolo G; Galeotti A; Paduano S; Valletta R; D'Antò V
Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):665-72. PubMed ID: 24308528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Static frictional force and surface roughness of nickel-titanium arch wires.
Prososki RR; Bagby MD; Erickson LC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):341-8. PubMed ID: 1927985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Synergistic effect of wire bending and salivary pH on surface properties and mechanical properties of orthodontic stainless steel archwires.
Hobbelink MG; He Y; Xu J; Xie H; Stoll R; Ye Q
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():37. PubMed ID: 26501207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Friction forces generated by aesthetic Gummetal® (Ti-Nb) orthodontic archwires: A comparative in vitro study.
Albawardi A; Warunek S; Makowka S; Al-Jewair T
Int Orthod; 2022 Dec; 20(4):100683. PubMed ID: 35995715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relative stiffness of beta titanium archwires.
Johnson E
Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):259-69. PubMed ID: 12828434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The friction and wear patterns of orthodontic brackets and archwires in the dry state.
Michelberger DJ; Eadie RL; Faulkner MG; Glover KE; Prasad NG; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 11113802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physical, mechanical, and flexural properties of 3 orthodontic wires: an in-vitro study.
Juvvadi SR; Kailasam V; Padmanabhan S; Chitharanjan AB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):623-30. PubMed ID: 21055604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Forces in stainless steel, TiMolium and TMA intrusion arches, with different bending magnitudes.
Claro CA; Abrão J; Reis SA
Braz Oral Res; 2007; 21(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 17589649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation and comparison of surface characteristics of commercially available TMA wires using scanning electron microscopy and optical profilometer.
Alexander L; Kommi PB; Arani N; Mathew A; Yashwant A; Senkutvan RS
Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(4):548-552. PubMed ID: 31745051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Static frictional force and surface roughness of various bracket and wire combinations.
Doshi UH; Bhad-Patil WA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 21195280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Weld characteristics of orthodontic archwire materials.
Krishnan V; Kumar KJ
Angle Orthod; 2004 Aug; 74(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 15387033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
