190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27443561)
1. Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency.
Welch VA; Tricco AC
BMC Med; 2016 Jul; 14(1):109. PubMed ID: 27443561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines: Helping to achieve high standards in reporting health research studies.
Simera I; Moher D; Hoey J; Schulz KF; Altman DG
Maturitas; 2009 May; 63(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 19372017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Taking advantage of unexpected WebCONSORT results.
Cobo E; González JA
BMC Med; 2016 Dec; 14(1):204. PubMed ID: 27915997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical research design and reporting: always room for improvement!
Heddle NM; Ness P
Transfusion; 2007 Jan; 47(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 17207221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Guidelines for reporting health care research: advancing the clarity and transparency of scientific reporting.
Moher D
Can J Anaesth; 2009 Feb; 56(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 19247756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations.
Wong G; Westhorp G; Manzano A; Greenhalgh J; Jagosh J; Greenhalgh T
BMC Med; 2016 Jun; 14(1):96. PubMed ID: 27342217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Editorial Decision Making for Academic Medicine, 2021.
Roberts LW; Coverdale J
Acad Med; 2021 Jan; 96(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 33394645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research.
Moher D; Avey M; Antes G; Altman DG
BMC Med; 2015 Feb; 13():34. PubMed ID: 25775278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Design, execution, interpretation, and reporting of economic evaluation studies in obstetrics.
Vintzileos AM; Beazoglou T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 191(4):1070-6. PubMed ID: 15507923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. JMT's Research Concepts Section: a 5-Year Evaluation.
Jang DH; Love JS; Mycyk MB
J Med Toxicol; 2019 Oct; 15(4):226-227. PubMed ID: 31385195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Are you also overwhelmed by the predators?
Fitzpatrick JJ
Appl Nurs Res; 2018 Feb; 39():270. PubMed ID: 29422172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Data presentation and the use of statistical tests in biomedical journals: can we reach a consensus?
Evans RG; Su DF
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2011 May; 38(5):285-6. PubMed ID: 21388434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ghost busting--taking the sheet off the ghost.
Moots RJ; Wilson K; Silverman ED
Z Rheumatol; 2016 Apr; 75(3):240-1. PubMed ID: 27038049
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Open season: positive changes for increased transparency in the biomedical literature.
Jones PM; Bryson GL
Can J Anaesth; 2018 Mar; 65(3):246-253. PubMed ID: 29164529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses.
Wong G; Greenhalgh T; Westhorp G; Buckingham J; Pawson R
J Adv Nurs; 2013 May; 69(5):1005-22. PubMed ID: 23356726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses.
Wong G; Greenhalgh T; Westhorp G; Buckingham J; Pawson R
BMC Med; 2013 Jan; 11():21. PubMed ID: 23360677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers.
Moher D
BMC Med; 2018 Dec; 16(1):233. PubMed ID: 30545364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Living cumulative network meta-analysis to reduce waste in research: A paradigmatic shift for systematic reviews?
Vandvik PO; Brignardello-Petersen R; Guyatt GH
BMC Med; 2016 Mar; 14():59. PubMed ID: 27025849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Protocol--the RAMESES II study: developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluation.
Greenhalgh T; Wong G; Jagosh J; Greenhalgh J; Manzano A; Westhorp G; Pawson R
BMJ Open; 2015 Aug; 5(8):e008567. PubMed ID: 26238395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
