These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 274438)
21. Washington Supreme Court decides case re: removal of life support systems. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1985 Jan; 8(2):11-2. PubMed ID: 10269741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Sounding board. The New York Court of appeals rules on the rights of incompetent dying patients. The conclusion of the Brother Fox case. Paris JJ N Engl J Med; 1981 Jun; 304(23):1424-5. PubMed ID: 7231467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The removal of Mr. Herbert's feeding tube. Steinbock B Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):13-6. PubMed ID: 6417049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Egregious inaction: five years later after Of Life and Death. Downie J Health Law Rev; 2000; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 15706705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Ethical criteria of terminating treatment]. Birnbacher D Zentralbl Chir; 1994; 119(3):198-200. PubMed ID: 8178588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Judicial approach beginning to develop for terminating life support systems. Part 1. Weissburg C; Hartz JN Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1979 Aug; 12(4):44-8. PubMed ID: 10242941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Euthanasia by request--from the medical viewpoint]. Helmchen H Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1993 Jan; 87(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 8442364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Do not resuscitate: the failure to protect the incompetent patient's right of self-determination. Shaver E Cornell Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 75(1):218-45. PubMed ID: 10296951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Life-prolonging and life-terminating treatment of severely handicapped newborn babies: a discussion of the Report of the Royal Dutch Society of Medicine on "Life-Terminating Actions with Incompetent Patients: Part I: Severely Handicapped Newborns". Jochemsen H Issues Law Med; 1992; 8(2):167-81. PubMed ID: 1399494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Medicine and human rights: emerging substantive standards and procedural protections for medical decision making within the American family. Baron CH J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1985; 18(2):95-141. PubMed ID: 4086738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Incompetent's right to die: who decides? Bernstein AH Hospitals; 1979 Sep; 53(17):39, 42. PubMed ID: 457072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The role of judges in life/death decisions for the neurologically impaired. Beresford HR Ann Neurol; 1978 Nov; 4(5):463-4. PubMed ID: 736527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Limiting and refraining from treatment from the legal viewpoint in intensive care medicine]. Opderbecke HW Zentralbl Chir; 1994; 119(3):201-3. PubMed ID: 8178589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The biology of the persistent vegetative state: legal, ethical, and philosophical implications for transplantation. Downie J Transplant Proc; 1990 Jun; 22(3):995-6. PubMed ID: 2349730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Only the court is competent. Connery JR Hosp Prog; 1978 May; 59(5):22-3. PubMed ID: 649109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. When do organs become "spare parts"? Kushner T Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(4):349-53. PubMed ID: 1342355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Medicine, society & the dying patient: the case of Granny Doe. Internist; 1984; 25(10):12-4. PubMed ID: 10269426 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Legalistic ethics and the lingering doubt about withdrawing life-supports. Vaux K J Allied Health; 1991; 20(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 1761409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The legal aspects of medical euthanasia. Meyers DW Bioscience; 1973 Aug; 23(8):467-70. PubMed ID: 11660863 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Should a patient be allowed to die? Satyapal KS J Ir Coll Physicians Surg; 1975 Apr; 4(4):164-8. PubMed ID: 11661195 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]