These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27444214)

  • 1. The Reliability of Instrumental Variables in Health Care Effectiveness Research: Less Is More.
    Soumerai SB; Koppel R
    Health Serv Res; 2017 Feb; 52(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 27444214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative effectiveness research in cancer with observational data.
    Giordano SH
    Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book; 2015; ():e330-5. PubMed ID: 25993193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Instrumental variable analyses for observational comparative effectiveness research: the paired availability design.
    Baker SG; Lindeman KS
    Ann Intern Med; 2014 Dec; 161(11):840-1. PubMed ID: 25437417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Instrumental variable analyses for observational comparative effectiveness research: the paired availability design.
    Garabedian LF; Zaslavsky AM; Soumerai SB
    Ann Intern Med; 2014 Dec; 161(11):841. PubMed ID: 25437418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Designing quality health services research: why comparative effectiveness studies are needed and why pharmacists should be involved.
    Carter BL
    Pharmacotherapy; 2010 Aug; 30(8):751-7. PubMed ID: 20653349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Getting to grips with the beast: the potential of multi-method operational research approaches.
    Burt J
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2017 Aug; 26(8):611-612. PubMed ID: 28137995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. From methods to policy: key questions remain unanswered.
    Dubois RW
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Jan; 3(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 24345251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian data analysis in observational comparative effectiveness research: rationale and examples.
    Olson WH; Crivera C; Ma YW; Panish J; Mao L; Lynch SM
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Nov; 2(6):563-71. PubMed ID: 24236795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Falsification Testing of Instrumental Variables Methods for Comparative Effectiveness Research.
    Pizer SD
    Health Serv Res; 2016 Apr; 51(2):790-811. PubMed ID: 26293167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative effectiveness clinical trials to advance treatment of myasthenia gravis.
    Guptill JT; Raja S; Sanders DB; Narayanaswami P
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Feb; 1413(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29377158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performing both propensity score and instrumental variable analyses in observational studies often leads to discrepant results: a systematic review.
    Laborde-Castérot H; Agrinier N; Thilly N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 68(10):1232-40. PubMed ID: 26026496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Population-Based Observational Studies in Oncology: Proceed With Caution.
    Soni PD; Spratt DE
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2019 Oct; 29(4):302-305. PubMed ID: 31472729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative effectiveness research: a view from the other side of the pond.
    Rawlins MD
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 May; 1(3):293-5. PubMed ID: 24237410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A framework for monitoring of new drugs in Sweden.
    Cars T; Lindhagen L; Sundström J
    Ups J Med Sci; 2019 Jan; 124(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 30689485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using observational studies for comparative effectiveness: finding quality with GRACE.
    Dreyer NA
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Sep; 2(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 24236736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Specifying a Conceptual Treatment Choice Relationship Before Analysis Is Necessary for Comparative Effectiveness Research.
    Cozad MJ; Chapman CG; Brooks JM
    Med Care; 2017 Feb; 55(2):94-96. PubMed ID: 27547948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tools for health care decision making: observational studies, modeling studies, and network meta-analyses.
    Aronson N; Grant MD
    Value Health; 2014 Mar; 17(2):141-2. PubMed ID: 24636372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Potential bias of instrumental variable analyses for observational comparative effectiveness research.
    Garabedian LF; Chu P; Toh S; Zaslavsky AM; Soumerai SB
    Ann Intern Med; 2014 Jul; 161(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 25023252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benchmarking Controlled Trial--a novel concept covering all observational effectiveness studies.
    Malmivaara A
    Ann Med; 2015 Jun; 47(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 25965700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Lies, damned lies ..." and observational studies in comparative effectiveness research.
    Albert RK
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2013 Jun; 187(11):1173-7. PubMed ID: 23725614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.