These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

721 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27447140)

  • 1. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
    Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching: different mismatch sizes, connection types, and implant protocols.
    Pessoa RS; Bezerra FJ; Sousa RM; Vander Sloten J; Casati MZ; Jaecques SV
    J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):1161-71. PubMed ID: 24635544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Pessoa RS; Vaz LG; Marcantonio E; Vander Sloten J; Duyck J; Jaecques SV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(5):911-9. PubMed ID: 20862404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical Effect of Prosthetic Connection and Implant Body Shape in Low-Quality Bone of Maxillary Posterior Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
    de Andrade CL; Carvalho MA; Del Bel Cury AA; Sotto-Maior BS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):e92-7. PubMed ID: 27447166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical Analysis of Implant-Supported Prostheses with Different Implant-Abutment Connections.
    Dayrell AC; Noritomi PY; Takahashi JM; Consani RL; Mesquita MF; dos Santos MB
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(6):621-3. PubMed ID: 26523723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bone Remodeling Around Implants with External Hexagon and Morse-Taper Connections: A Randomized, Controlled, Split-Mouth, Clinical Trial.
    Pessoa RS; Sousa RM; Pereira LM; Neves FD; Bezerra FJ; Jaecques SV; Sloten JV; Quirynen M; Teughels W; Spin-Neto R
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 19(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 27353076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Implant-Abutment Connections, Retention Systems, and Restorative Materials in the Implant-Supported Single Crowns Using 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Noritomi PY; de Souza Batista VE; Cruz RS; de Luna Gomes JM; de Oliveira Limírio JPJ; Pellizzer EP
    J Oral Implantol; 2022 Jun; 48(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 34091686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison of Torque Stress on Abutment Screw of External Hexagon and Morse Taper Implant.
    Rodrigues EDS; Benetti P; Carli JP; Paranhos LR; Santos PL; Linden MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1306-1311. PubMed ID: 30602632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.
    Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finite element analysis of stress extent at peri-implant bone surrounding external hexagon or Morse taper implants.
    Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Pereira CA; Alves JL; Henriques B; Souza JCM; López-López J
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jul; 71():441-447. PubMed ID: 28499606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective clinical evaluation of 1920 Morse taper connection implants: results after 4 years of functional loading.
    Mangano C; Mangano F; Piattelli A; Iezzi G; Mangano A; La Colla L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):254-61. PubMed ID: 19397637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest.
    Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Souza JCM; Alves JL; López-López J; Henriques B
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Sep; 21(12):655-662. PubMed ID: 30693810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Naini RB; Nokar S; Borghei H; Alikhasi M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 21841987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Mandible with an Immediately Loaded Full-Arch Fixed Prosthesis Supported by Three Implants: A 5-Year Retrospective Analysis.
    Mezzari LM; Primo BT; Bavaresco CS; Caminha R; Rivaldo EG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):719–725. PubMed ID: 30779822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of the prosthetic index on stress distribution in Morse taper connection implant system and peri-implant bone: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Zhang WT; Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Wang R; Chen YF; Ding YD; Yang F; Wang LH
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Sep; 22(1):431. PubMed ID: 36180871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of abutment screw preload in two implant connection systems: A 3D finite element study.
    Jung WK; Lee WS; Kwon HB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):474.e1-474.e8. PubMed ID: 31590980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective evaluation of 2,549 Morse taper connection implants: 1- to 6-year data.
    Mangano C; Mangano F; Shibli JA; Tettamanti L; Figliuzzi M; d'Avila S; Sammons RL; Piattelli A
    J Periodontol; 2011 Jan; 82(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 20653436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Morse taper connection implants supporting "planned" maxillary and mandibular bar-retained overdentures: a 5-year prospective multicenter study.
    Mangano C; Mangano F; Shibli JA; Ricci M; Sammons RL; Figliuzzi M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Oct; 22(10):1117-1124. PubMed ID: 21251077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical analysis of 4 types of short dental implants in a resorbed mandible.
    Lee H; Park S; Noh G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):659-670. PubMed ID: 30580986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Influence of Bone Quality on the Biomechanical Behavior of a Tooth-Implant Fixed Partial Denture: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Tsouknidas A; Giannopoulos D; Savvakis S; Michailidis N; Lympoudi E; Fytanidis D; Pissiotis A; Michalakis K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):e143-e154. PubMed ID: 27861651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.