These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27449275)

  • 1. A computational geometry framework for the optimisation of atom probe reconstructions.
    Felfer P; Cairney J
    Ultramicroscopy; 2016 Oct; 169():62-68. PubMed ID: 27449275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Introducing a Crystallography-Mediated Reconstruction (CMR) Approach to Atom Probe Tomography.
    Day AC; Ceguerra AV; Ringer SP
    Microsc Microanal; 2019 Apr; 25(2):288-300. PubMed ID: 30712521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the retrieval of crystallographic information from atom probe microscopy data via signal mapping from the detector coordinate space.
    Wallace ND; Ceguerra AV; Breen AJ; Ringer SP
    Ultramicroscopy; 2018 Jun; 189():65-75. PubMed ID: 29625338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards an accurate volume reconstruction in atom probe tomography.
    Beinke D; Oberdorfer C; Schmitz G
    Ultramicroscopy; 2016 Jun; 165():34-41. PubMed ID: 27062338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Restoring the lattice of Si-based atom probe reconstructions for enhanced information on dopant positioning.
    Breen AJ; Moody MP; Ceguerra AV; Gault B; Araullo-Peters VJ; Ringer SP
    Ultramicroscopy; 2015 Dec; 159 Pt 2():314-23. PubMed ID: 26190007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Crystallographic structural analysis in atom probe microscopy via 3D Hough transformation.
    Yao L; Moody MP; Cairney JM; Haley D; Ceguerra AV; Zhu C; Ringer SP
    Ultramicroscopy; 2011 May; 111(6):458-63. PubMed ID: 21146305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Automated Computational Approach for Complete In-Plane Compositional Interface Analysis by Atom Probe Tomography.
    Peng Z; Lu Y; Hatzoglou C; Kwiatkowski da Silva A; Vurpillot F; Ponge D; Raabe D; Gault B
    Microsc Microanal; 2019 Apr; 25(2):389-400. PubMed ID: 30722805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the use of simulated field-evaporated specimen apex shapes in atom probe tomography data reconstruction.
    Larson DJ; Geiser BP; Prosa TJ; Kelly TF
    Microsc Microanal; 2012 Oct; 18(5):953-63. PubMed ID: 23058657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shaping the lens of the atom probe: fabrication of site specific, oriented specimens and application to grain boundary analysis.
    Felfer P; Ringer SP; Cairney JM
    Ultramicroscopy; 2011 May; 111(6):435-9. PubMed ID: 21247698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Crystallography-Mediated Reconstruction (CMR) Approach for Atom Probe Tomography: Solution for a Singleton Pole.
    Day AC; Breen AJ; Ringer SP
    Ultramicroscopy; 2021 May; 224():113262. PubMed ID: 33798817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlating Atom Probe Crystallographic Measurements with Transmission Kikuchi Diffraction Data.
    Breen AJ; Babinsky K; Day AC; Eder K; Oakman CJ; Trimby PW; Primig S; Cairney JM; Ringer SP
    Microsc Microanal; 2017 Apr; 23(2):279-290. PubMed ID: 28288697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Atom probe trajectory mapping using experimental tip shape measurements.
    Haley D; Petersen T; Ringer SP; Smith GD
    J Microsc; 2011 Nov; 244(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 22004277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrostatic simulations of a local electrode atom probe: the dependence of tomographic reconstruction parameters on specimen and microscope geometry.
    Loi ST; Gault B; Ringer SP; Larson DJ; Geiser BP
    Ultramicroscopy; 2013 Sep; 132():107-13. PubMed ID: 23294557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reconstructing atom probe data: a review.
    Vurpillot F; Gault B; Geiser BP; Larson DJ
    Ultramicroscopy; 2013 Sep; 132():19-30. PubMed ID: 23607993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interpreting Atom Probe Data from Oxide-Metal Interfaces.
    McCarroll I; Scherrer B; Felfer P; Moody MP; Cairney JM
    Microsc Microanal; 2018 Aug; 24(4):342-349. PubMed ID: 30175704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Bottom-Up Volume Reconstruction Method for Atom Probe Tomography.
    Ling YT; Cools S; Bogdanowicz J; Fleischmann C; Beenhouwer J; Sijbers J; Vandervorst W
    Microsc Microanal; 2022 Jan; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 35088688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reflections on the Projection of Ions in Atom Probe Tomography.
    De Geuser F; Gault B
    Microsc Microanal; 2017 Apr; 23(2):238-246. PubMed ID: 28148309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Focused ion beam preparation of atom probe specimens containing a single crystallographically well-defined grain boundary.
    Pérez-Willard F; Wolde-Giorgis D; Al-Kassab T; López GA; Mittemeijer EJ; Kirchheim R; Gerthsen D
    Micron; 2008; 39(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 17331735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self-consistent atom probe tomography reconstructions utilizing electron microscopy.
    Diercks DR; Gorman BP
    Ultramicroscopy; 2018 Dec; 195():32-46. PubMed ID: 30179773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Level set methods for modelling field evaporation in atom probe.
    Haley D; Moody MP; Smith GD
    Microsc Microanal; 2013 Dec; 19(6):1709-17. PubMed ID: 23985174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.