These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2744954)

  • 1. Comparison of different screening methods for the detection of visual field defects in early glaucoma.
    Marraffa M; Marchini G; Albertini R; Bonomi L
    Int Ophthalmol; 1989 Jan; 13(1-2):43-5. PubMed ID: 2744954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suprathreshold static perimetry in glaucoma and other optic nerve disease.
    Johnson CA; Keltner JL; Balestrery FG
    Ophthalmology; 1979 Jul; 86(7):1278-86. PubMed ID: 233860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blue-on-yellow perimetry using an Armaly glaucoma screening program.
    Maeda H; Tanaka Y; Nakamura M; Yamamoto M
    Ophthalmologica; 1999; 213(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 9885383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency doubling technique in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma: correlation with octopus perimeter indices.
    Iester M; Mermoud A; Schnyder C
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Feb; 107(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 10690827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Johnson CA; Adams AJ; Casson EJ; Brandt JD
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 May; 111(5):645-50. PubMed ID: 8489447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Visual Field Measurement with Heidelberg Edge Perimeter and Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer in Patients with Ocular Hypertension.
    Kaczorowski K; Mulak M; Szumny D; Baranowska M; Jakubaszko-Jabłońska J; Misiuk-Hojło M
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2016; 25(5):937-944. PubMed ID: 28028959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is visual field evaluation using multiple correlations and linear regressions useful? An evaluation of Delphi perimetry.
    Wishart PK; Wardrop DR; Kosmin AS
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 Jul; 236(7):493-500. PubMed ID: 9672794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of five methods for estimating general glaucomatous visual field depression.
    Funkhouser A; Flammer J; Fankhauser F; Hirsbrunner HP
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1992; 230(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 1577286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of Goldmann and Humphrey automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma.
    Trope GE; Britton R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1987 Jul; 71(7):489-93. PubMed ID: 3307897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Glaucomatous damage patterns by short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in glaucoma suspects.
    Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pinilla I; Gonzalvo F; Ferreras A; Honrubia FM
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2002; 12(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 11936444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [First experience with the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter® on patients with ocular hypertension and preperimetric glaucoma].
    Hasler S; Stürmer J
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Apr; 229(4):319-22. PubMed ID: 22495996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and the Goldmann perimeter.
    Beck RW; Bergstrom TJ; Lichter PR
    Ophthalmology; 1985 Jan; 92(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 3974997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical experiences with the use of an automated perimeter (Octopus) in the diagnosis and management of patients with glaucoma and neurologic diseases.
    Li SG; Spaeth GL; Scimeca HA; Schatz NJ; Savino PJ
    Ophthalmology; 1979 Jul; 86(7):1302-16. PubMed ID: 233862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of high-pass resolution perimetry and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Martinez GA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1995 Feb; 119(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 7832226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multicenter evaluation of tendency-oriented perimetry (TOP) using the G1 grid.
    Gonzáles de la Rosa M; Morales J; Dannheim F; Papst E; Papst N; Seiler TJ; Matsumoto C; Lachkar Y; Mermoud A; Prünte C
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2003; 13(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 12635672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Glaucoma diagnostics.
    Geimer SA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The efficacy of the dicon screening field to detect eyes with glaucomatous field loss by Humphrey threshold testing.
    Huang AS; Smith SD; Quigley HA
    J Glaucoma; 1998 Jun; 7(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 9627854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of central visual field defects in early glaucomatous eyes: Comparison of Humphrey and Octopus perimetry.
    Roberti G; Manni G; Riva I; Holló G; Quaranta L; Agnifili L; Figus M; Giammaria S; Rastelli D; Oddone F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186793. PubMed ID: 29077730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of Peritest automated perimetry and Goldmann perimetry.
    Hotchkiss ML; Robin AL; Quigley HA; Pollack IP
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1985 Mar; 103(3):397-403. PubMed ID: 3977715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.