These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2745009)

  • 21. Prospective randomized trial of iohexol 350 versus meglumine sodium diatrizoate as an oral contrast agent for abdominopelvic computed tomography.
    Peterson CM; Lin M; Pilgram T; Heiken JP
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 21412090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of iohexol and diatrizoate-meglumine in children undergoing cardiac catheterization.
    Pelech AN; Allard SM; Hurd RT; Giddins NG; Collins GF
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Jul; 26(7):665-70. PubMed ID: 1885274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Determination of hematocrit and iodine concentrations following intravenous bolus administration of ionic and nonionic monomeric and dimeric contrast media--an animal experimental study].
    Claussen CD; Duda SH; Weinmann HJ
    Rofo; 1988 Nov; 149(5):529-33. PubMed ID: 2848287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of nonionic and ionic contrast agents in the rabbit lung.
    Moore DE; Carroll FE; Dutt PL; Reed GW; Holburn GE
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Feb; 26(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 2055713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Incidence of fibrillation with dilute contrast media for intra-arterial coronary digital subtraction angiography.
    Morris TW; Ventura J
    Invest Radiol; 1986 May; 21(5):416-8. PubMed ID: 3519525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Physiologic effects of contrast media in the rabbit.
    Harnish P; Mukherji M; Kido DK
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Nov; 22(11):901-4. PubMed ID: 3429187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multicenter trial of ionic versus nonionic contrast media for cardiac angiography. The Iohexol Cooperative Study.
    Hill JA; Winniford M; Cohen MB; Van Fossen DB; Murphy MJ; Halpern EF; Ludbrook PA; Wexler L; Rudnick MR; Goldfarb S
    Am J Cardiol; 1993 Oct; 72(11):770-5. PubMed ID: 8213508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of intravenous contrast agents for CT studies in children.
    Cohen MD; Herman E; Herron D; White SJ; Smith JA
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Nov; 33(6):592-5. PubMed ID: 1449887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Vasodilatation and vasoconstriction in the rabbit isolated aorta. Effects of ioxilan, iohexol, and diatrizoate.
    Schneider KM; Rand MJ
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Sep; 23 Suppl 1():S150-2. PubMed ID: 3198336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of intracoronary administration of contrast media on myocardial high-energy phosphate. A comparison of sodium meglumine diatrizoate and iohexol.
    Hwang MH; Piao ZE; Malinowska K; Sheu SH; Loeb HS; Scanlon PJ
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Jan; 27(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 1733878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Oral administration of intravenous contrast media: a tasty alternative to conventional oral contrast media in computed tomography].
    Diederichs G; Franiel T; Asbach P; Romano V; Hamm B; Rogalla P
    Rofo; 2007 Oct; 179(10):1061-7. PubMed ID: 17786895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The need for improved contrast media. Ioxilan: updating design theory.
    Sovak M
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Sep; 23 Suppl 1():S79-83. PubMed ID: 3058636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of hepatic damage from direct injections of iodinated contrast agents and carbon dioxide.
    Culp WC; Mladinich CR; Hawkins IF
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1999 Oct; 10(9):1265-70. PubMed ID: 10527206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intravenous vs. left ventricular injection of ionic contrast material: hemodynamic implications for digital subtraction angiography.
    Mancini GB; Ostrander DR; Slutsky RA; Shabetai R; Higgins CB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Mar; 140(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 6337461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of iohexol with meglumine-Na diatrizoate for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Seeger JF; Carmody RF; Smith JR; Horsley WW; Criss E
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():85-8. PubMed ID: 6382940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interaction between verapamil and contrast media in coronary arteriography: comparison of standard ionic and new nonionic media.
    Higgins CB; Kuber M; Slutsky RA
    Circulation; 1983 Sep; 68(3):628-35. PubMed ID: 6872173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Nephrotoxicity of ionic and nonionic contrast media in 1196 patients: a randomized trial. The Iohexol Cooperative Study.
    Rudnick MR; Goldfarb S; Wexler L; Ludbrook PA; Murphy MJ; Halpern EF; Hill JA; Winniford M; Cohen MB; VanFossen DB
    Kidney Int; 1995 Jan; 47(1):254-61. PubMed ID: 7731155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cardiovascular responses following the intracarotid injections of ionic and nonionic contrast media compared with various mannitol solutions. Correlation with osmolality.
    Yamashita K; Hayakawa K; Tanaka M; Konishi J
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Sep; 23(9):680-6. PubMed ID: 3141312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Immediate effects of graded ionic and nonionic contrast injections on coronary blood flow and myocardial function. Implications for digital coronary angiography.
    Friedman HZ; DeBoe SF; McGillem MJ; Mancini GB
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Sep; 22(9):722-7. PubMed ID: 3316109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Repeated intracoronary injections of contrast media. Additive hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects in a dog model.
    Jacobsen EA; Kløw NE; Pedersen HK; Refsum H
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Oct; 28(10):917-24. PubMed ID: 8262746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.