These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
713 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27450156)
1. Optimization of left ventricular pacing site plus multipoint pacing improves remodeling and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy at 1 year. Zanon F; Marcantoni L; Baracca E; Pastore G; Lanza D; Fraccaro C; Picariello C; Conte L; Aggio S; Roncon L; Pacetta D; Badie N; Noventa F; Prinzen FW Heart Rhythm; 2016 Aug; 13(8):1644-51. PubMed ID: 27450156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with and without pressure-volume loop optimization: comparison of the long-term efficacy of two different programming strategies. Ciconte G; Ćalović Ž; McSpadden LC; Ryu K; Mangual J; Caporaso I; Baldi M; Saviano M; Cuko A; Vitale R; Conti M; Giannelli L; Vicedomini G; Santinelli V; Pappone C J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2019 Mar; 54(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 30483980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multipoint left ventricular pacing in a single coronary sinus branch improves mid-term echocardiographic and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Pappone C; Ćalović Ž; Vicedomini G; Cuko A; McSpadden LC; Ryu K; Romano E; Baldi M; Saviano M; Pappone A; Ciaccio C; Giannelli L; Ionescu B; Petretta A; Vitale R; Fundaliotis A; Tavazzi L; Santinelli V J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 25109276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multipoint left ventricular pacing with large anatomical separation improves reverse remodeling and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in responders and non-responders to conventional biventricular pacing. Schiedat F; Schöne D; Aweimer A; Bösche L; Ewers A; Gotzmann M; Patsalis PC; Mügge A; Kloppe A Clin Res Cardiol; 2020 Feb; 109(2):183-193. PubMed ID: 31152199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term reverse remodeling by cardiac resynchronization therapy with MultiPoint Pacing: A feasibility study of noninvasive hemodynamics-guided device programming. Lercher P; Lunati M; Rordorf R; Landolina M; Badie N; Qu F; Casset C; Ryu K; Ghio S; Singh JP; Leclercq C Heart Rhythm; 2018 Dec; 15(12):1766-1774. PubMed ID: 29940305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving cardiac resynchronization therapy response with multipoint left ventricular pacing: Twelve-month follow-up study. Pappone C; Ćalović Ž; Vicedomini G; Cuko A; McSpadden LC; Ryu K; Jordan CD; Romano E; Baldi M; Saviano M; Pappone A; Vitale R; Catalano C; Ciaccio C; Giannelli L; Ionescu B; Petretta A; Fragakis N; Fundaliotis A; Tavazzi L; Santinelli V Heart Rhythm; 2015 Jun; 12(6):1250-8. PubMed ID: 25678057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of ventricular activation pattern and acute hemodynamics during multipoint left ventricular pacing. Menardi E; Ballari GP; Goletto C; Rossetti G; Vado A Heart Rhythm; 2015 Aug; 12(8):1762-9. PubMed ID: 25916565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multipoint pacing by a left ventricular quadripolar lead improves the acute hemodynamic response to CRT compared with conventional biventricular pacing at any site. Zanon F; Baracca E; Pastore G; Marcantoni L; Fraccaro C; Lanza D; Picariello C; Aggio S; Roncon L; Dell'Avvocata F; Rigatelli G; Pacetta D; Noventa F; Prinzen FW Heart Rhythm; 2015 May; 12(5):975-81. PubMed ID: 25625721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of multipoint pacing therapy: MOre REsponse on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with MultiPoint Pacing (MORE-CRT MPP-PHASE II). Leclercq C; Burri H; Curnis A; Delnoy PP; Rinaldi CA; Sperzel J; Lee K; Cohorn C; Thibault B; Am Heart J; 2019 Mar; 209():1-8. PubMed ID: 30616009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Haemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy using single-vein, three-pole, multipoint left ventricular pacing in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and a left ventricular free wall scar: the MAESTRO study. Umar F; Taylor RJ; Stegemann B; Marshall H; Flannigan S; Lencioni M; De Bono J; Griffith M; Leyva F Europace; 2016 Aug; 18(8):1227-34. PubMed ID: 26718535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of Left Ventricular vs Biventricular Pacing on Reverse Remodelling: Insights From the Evaluation of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure (EARTH) Trial. Skaf S; Thibault B; Khairy P; O'Meara E; Fortier A; Vakulenko HV; Pitre C; White M; Ducharme A; Can J Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 33(10):1274-1282. PubMed ID: 28941607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acute echocardiographic optimization of multiple stimulation configurations of cardiac resynchronization therapy through quadripolar left ventricular pacing: a tailored approach. Calò L; Martino A; de Ruvo E; Minati M; Fratini S; Rebecchi M; Lanzillo C; Fagagnini A; Borrelli A; De Luca L; Sciarra L Am Heart J; 2014 Apr; 167(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 24655704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical impact of an additional left ventricular lead in cardiac resynchronization therapy nonresponders: The V Bordachar P; Gras D; Clementy N; Defaye P; Mondoly P; Boveda S; Anselme F; Klug D; Piot O; Sadoul N; Babuty D; Leclercq C Heart Rhythm; 2018 Jun; 15(6):870-876. PubMed ID: 29288035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of multisite left ventricular pacing via quadripolar lead improves acute haemodynamics and mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by radial strain speckle tracking: initial results. Osca J; Alonso P; Cano O; Andrés A; Miro V; Tello MJ; Olagüe J; Martínez L; Salvador A Europace; 2016 Apr; 18(4):560-7. PubMed ID: 26333378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves acute hemodynamic response assessed with pressure-volume loops in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients. Pappone C; Ćalović Ž; Vicedomini G; Cuko A; McSpadden LC; Ryu K; Romano E; Saviano M; Baldi M; Pappone A; Ciaccio C; Giannelli L; Ionescu B; Petretta A; Vitale R; Fundaliotis A; Tavazzi L; Santinelli V Heart Rhythm; 2014 Mar; 11(3):394-401. PubMed ID: 24291411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Left Ventricular Enlargement, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Efficacy, and Impact of MultiPoint Pacing. Varma N; Baker J; Tomassoni G; Love CJ; Martin D; Sheppard R; Niazi I; Cranke G; Lee K; Corbisiero R Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2020 Nov; 13(11):e008680. PubMed ID: 33028082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Safety and Efficacy of Multipoint Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The MultiPoint Pacing Trial. Niazi I; Baker J; Corbisiero R; Love C; Martin D; Sheppard R; Worley SJ; Varma N; Lee K; Tomassoni G; JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Dec; 3(13):1510-1518. PubMed ID: 29759832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rationale and design of a randomized trial to assess the safety and efficacy of MultiPoint Pacing (MPP) in cardiac resynchronization therapy: The MPP Trial. Tomassoni G; Baker J; Corbisiero R; Love C; Martin D; Sheppard R; Worley SJ; Lee K; Niazi I; Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2017 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 28517367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Left ventricular lead electrical delay predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Singh JP; Fan D; Heist EK; Alabiad CR; Taub C; Reddy V; Mansour M; Picard MH; Ruskin JN; Mela T Heart Rhythm; 2006 Nov; 3(11):1285-92. PubMed ID: 17074633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized double-blind comparison of biventricular versus left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Biventricular versus Left Univentricular Pacing with ICD Back-up in Heart Failure Patients (B-LEFT HF) trial. Boriani G; Kranig W; Donal E; Calo L; Casella M; Delarche N; Lozano IF; Ansalone G; Biffi M; Boulogne E; Leclercq C; Am Heart J; 2010 Jun; 159(6):1052-1058.e1. PubMed ID: 20569719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]