711 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27450156)
1. Optimization of left ventricular pacing site plus multipoint pacing improves remodeling and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy at 1 year.
Zanon F; Marcantoni L; Baracca E; Pastore G; Lanza D; Fraccaro C; Picariello C; Conte L; Aggio S; Roncon L; Pacetta D; Badie N; Noventa F; Prinzen FW
Heart Rhythm; 2016 Aug; 13(8):1644-51. PubMed ID: 27450156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with and without pressure-volume loop optimization: comparison of the long-term efficacy of two different programming strategies.
Ciconte G; Ćalović Ž; McSpadden LC; Ryu K; Mangual J; Caporaso I; Baldi M; Saviano M; Cuko A; Vitale R; Conti M; Giannelli L; Vicedomini G; Santinelli V; Pappone C
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2019 Mar; 54(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 30483980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multipoint left ventricular pacing in a single coronary sinus branch improves mid-term echocardiographic and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Pappone C; Ćalović Ž; Vicedomini G; Cuko A; McSpadden LC; Ryu K; Romano E; Baldi M; Saviano M; Pappone A; Ciaccio C; Giannelli L; Ionescu B; Petretta A; Vitale R; Fundaliotis A; Tavazzi L; Santinelli V
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 25109276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multipoint left ventricular pacing with large anatomical separation improves reverse remodeling and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in responders and non-responders to conventional biventricular pacing.
Schiedat F; Schöne D; Aweimer A; Bösche L; Ewers A; Gotzmann M; Patsalis PC; Mügge A; Kloppe A
Clin Res Cardiol; 2020 Feb; 109(2):183-193. PubMed ID: 31152199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term reverse remodeling by cardiac resynchronization therapy with MultiPoint Pacing: A feasibility study of noninvasive hemodynamics-guided device programming.
Lercher P; Lunati M; Rordorf R; Landolina M; Badie N; Qu F; Casset C; Ryu K; Ghio S; Singh JP; Leclercq C
Heart Rhythm; 2018 Dec; 15(12):1766-1774. PubMed ID: 29940305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving cardiac resynchronization therapy response with multipoint left ventricular pacing: Twelve-month follow-up study.
Pappone C; Ćalović Ž; Vicedomini G; Cuko A; McSpadden LC; Ryu K; Jordan CD; Romano E; Baldi M; Saviano M; Pappone A; Vitale R; Catalano C; Ciaccio C; Giannelli L; Ionescu B; Petretta A; Fragakis N; Fundaliotis A; Tavazzi L; Santinelli V
Heart Rhythm; 2015 Jun; 12(6):1250-8. PubMed ID: 25678057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of ventricular activation pattern and acute hemodynamics during multipoint left ventricular pacing.
Menardi E; Ballari GP; Goletto C; Rossetti G; Vado A
Heart Rhythm; 2015 Aug; 12(8):1762-9. PubMed ID: 25916565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multipoint pacing by a left ventricular quadripolar lead improves the acute hemodynamic response to CRT compared with conventional biventricular pacing at any site.
Zanon F; Baracca E; Pastore G; Marcantoni L; Fraccaro C; Lanza D; Picariello C; Aggio S; Roncon L; Dell'Avvocata F; Rigatelli G; Pacetta D; Noventa F; Prinzen FW
Heart Rhythm; 2015 May; 12(5):975-81. PubMed ID: 25625721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of multipoint pacing therapy: MOre REsponse on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with MultiPoint Pacing (MORE-CRT MPP-PHASE II).
Leclercq C; Burri H; Curnis A; Delnoy PP; Rinaldi CA; Sperzel J; Lee K; Cohorn C; Thibault B;
Am Heart J; 2019 Mar; 209():1-8. PubMed ID: 30616009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Haemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy using single-vein, three-pole, multipoint left ventricular pacing in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and a left ventricular free wall scar: the MAESTRO study.
Umar F; Taylor RJ; Stegemann B; Marshall H; Flannigan S; Lencioni M; De Bono J; Griffith M; Leyva F
Europace; 2016 Aug; 18(8):1227-34. PubMed ID: 26718535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of Left Ventricular vs Biventricular Pacing on Reverse Remodelling: Insights From the Evaluation of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure (EARTH) Trial.
Skaf S; Thibault B; Khairy P; O'Meara E; Fortier A; Vakulenko HV; Pitre C; White M; Ducharme A;
Can J Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 33(10):1274-1282. PubMed ID: 28941607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acute echocardiographic optimization of multiple stimulation configurations of cardiac resynchronization therapy through quadripolar left ventricular pacing: a tailored approach.
Calò L; Martino A; de Ruvo E; Minati M; Fratini S; Rebecchi M; Lanzillo C; Fagagnini A; Borrelli A; De Luca L; Sciarra L
Am Heart J; 2014 Apr; 167(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 24655704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical impact of an additional left ventricular lead in cardiac resynchronization therapy nonresponders: The V
Bordachar P; Gras D; Clementy N; Defaye P; Mondoly P; Boveda S; Anselme F; Klug D; Piot O; Sadoul N; Babuty D; Leclercq C
Heart Rhythm; 2018 Jun; 15(6):870-876. PubMed ID: 29288035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of multisite left ventricular pacing via quadripolar lead improves acute haemodynamics and mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by radial strain speckle tracking: initial results.
Osca J; Alonso P; Cano O; Andrés A; Miro V; Tello MJ; Olagüe J; Martínez L; Salvador A
Europace; 2016 Apr; 18(4):560-7. PubMed ID: 26333378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves acute hemodynamic response assessed with pressure-volume loops in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients.
Pappone C; Ćalović Ž; Vicedomini G; Cuko A; McSpadden LC; Ryu K; Romano E; Saviano M; Baldi M; Pappone A; Ciaccio C; Giannelli L; Ionescu B; Petretta A; Vitale R; Fundaliotis A; Tavazzi L; Santinelli V
Heart Rhythm; 2014 Mar; 11(3):394-401. PubMed ID: 24291411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Left Ventricular Enlargement, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Efficacy, and Impact of MultiPoint Pacing.
Varma N; Baker J; Tomassoni G; Love CJ; Martin D; Sheppard R; Niazi I; Cranke G; Lee K; Corbisiero R
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2020 Nov; 13(11):e008680. PubMed ID: 33028082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Safety and Efficacy of Multipoint Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The MultiPoint Pacing Trial.
Niazi I; Baker J; Corbisiero R; Love C; Martin D; Sheppard R; Worley SJ; Varma N; Lee K; Tomassoni G;
JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Dec; 3(13):1510-1518. PubMed ID: 29759832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non-Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single-Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization.
Leyva F; Zegard A; Qiu T; Acquaye E; Ferrante G; Walton J; Marshall H
J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Oct; 6(10):. PubMed ID: 29042422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rationale and design of a randomized trial to assess the safety and efficacy of MultiPoint Pacing (MPP) in cardiac resynchronization therapy: The MPP Trial.
Tomassoni G; Baker J; Corbisiero R; Love C; Martin D; Sheppard R; Worley SJ; Lee K; Niazi I;
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2017 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 28517367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Left ventricular lead electrical delay predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Singh JP; Fan D; Heist EK; Alabiad CR; Taub C; Reddy V; Mansour M; Picard MH; Ruskin JN; Mela T
Heart Rhythm; 2006 Nov; 3(11):1285-92. PubMed ID: 17074633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
