These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27452179)

  • 1. Verification of out-of-control situations detected by "average of normal" approach.
    Liu J; Tan CH; Loh TP; Badrick T
    Clin Biochem; 2016 Nov; 49(16-17):1248-1253. PubMed ID: 27452179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Moving standard deviation and moving sum of outliers as quality tools for monitoring analytical precision.
    Liu J; Tan CH; Badrick T; Loh TP
    Clin Biochem; 2018 Feb; 52():112-116. PubMed ID: 29107011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient population controls.
    Carey RN
    Clin Lab Med; 2013 Mar; 33(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 23331734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design and assessment of average of normals (AON) patient data algorithms to maximize run lengths for automatic process control.
    Westgard JO; Smith FA; Mountain PJ; Boss S
    Clin Chem; 1996 Oct; 42(10):1683-8. PubMed ID: 8855154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The detection of problem analytes in a single proficiency test challenge in the absence of the Health Care Financing Administration rule violations.
    Cembrowski GS; Hackney JR; Carey N
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 8466413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Analytical uncertainty--how wrong can a laboratory result be?].
    Bolann BJ; Stølsnes B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Dec; 119(30):4472-5. PubMed ID: 10827487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Internal quality control of prothrombin time in primary care: comparing the use of patient split samples with lyophilised control materials.
    Stavelin A; Petersen PH; Sølvik U; Sandberg S
    Thromb Haemost; 2009 Sep; 102(3):593-600. PubMed ID: 19718482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Choosing quality-control systems to detect maximum clinically allowable analytical errors.
    Linnet K
    Clin Chem; 1989 Feb; 35(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 2914374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The accuracy of laboratory measurements in clinical chemistry: a study of 11 routine chemistry analytes in the College of American Pathologists Chemistry Survey with fresh frozen serum, definitive methods, and reference methods.
    Ross JW; Miller WG; Myers GL; Praestgaard J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jul; 122(7):587-608. PubMed ID: 9674541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The quality assurance system in clinical chemistry.
    Albertini A; Signorini C
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1995; 31(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 8546372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) rule compared with traditionally used quality control rules.
    Linnet K
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(4):396-9. PubMed ID: 16599831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of analytical run length on quality-control (QC) performance and the QC planning process.
    Parvin CA; Gronowski AM
    Clin Chem; 1997 Nov; 43(11):2149-54. PubMed ID: 9365401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of medians and "average of normals" of patients' data for assessment of long-term analytical stability.
    Lott JA; Smith DA; Mitchell LC; Moeschberger ML
    Clin Chem; 1996 Jun; 42(6 Pt 1):888-92. PubMed ID: 8665680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changing the paradigm of laboratory quality control through implementation of real-time test results monitoring: For patients by patients.
    Fleming JK; Katayev A
    Clin Biochem; 2015 May; 48(7-8):508-13. PubMed ID: 25549976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mean and variance quality control for multiple correlated levels of replicated control samples.
    Livesey JH
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2005; 43(11):1240-52. PubMed ID: 16232092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of analytical quality on establishing common reference intervals and their use.
    Rustad P; Hyltoft Petersen P
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2004; 64(4):399-406. PubMed ID: 15223703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Internal quality control system for non-stationary, non-ergodic analytical processes based upon exponentially weighted estimation of process means and process standard deviation.
    Jansen RT; Laeven M; Kardol W
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2002 Jun; 40(6):616-24. PubMed ID: 12211659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new quality control method based on a moving average of "latent reference values" selected from patients' daily test results.
    Hayashi S; Ichihara K; Kanakura Y; Iwatani Y
    Rinsho Byori; 2004 Mar; 52(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 15137317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Moving average procedures as an additional tool for real-time analytical quality control: challenges and opportunities of implementation in small-volume medical laboratories.
    Lukić V; Ignjatović S
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2022 Feb; 32(1):010705. PubMed ID: 34955673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exponentially adjusted moving mean procedure for quality control. An optimized patient sample control procedure.
    Smith FA; Kroft SH
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Jan; 105(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 8561087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.