137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27452268)
1. Evaluation of uterine ultrasound imaging in cervical radiotherapy; a comparison of autoscan and conventional probe.
Baker M; Cooper DT; Behrens CF
Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20160510. PubMed ID: 27452268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Towards ultrasound-guided adaptive radiotherapy for cervical cancer: Evaluation of Elekta's semiautomated uterine segmentation method on 3D ultrasound images.
Mason SA; O'Shea TP; White IM; Lalondrelle S; Downey K; Baker M; Behrens CF; Bamber JC; Harris EJ
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3630-3638. PubMed ID: 28493295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Stacked-Ellipse Algorithm: An Ultrasound-Based 3-D Uterine Segmentation Tool for Enabling Adaptive Radiotherapy for Uterine Cervix Cancer.
Mason SA; White IM; Lalondrelle S; Bamber JC; Harris EJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Apr; 46(4):1040-1052. PubMed ID: 31926750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A 3D ultrasound scanning system for image guided liver interventions.
Neshat H; Cool DW; Barker K; Gardi L; Kakani N; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):112903. PubMed ID: 24320470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate displacement during transabdominal ultrasound image-guided radiotherapy assessed by real-time four-dimensional transperineal monitoring.
Baker M; Behrens CF
Acta Oncol; 2015; 54(9):1508-14. PubMed ID: 26203927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intra-patient semi-automated segmentation of the cervix-uterus in CT-images for adaptive radiotherapy of cervical cancer.
Bondar ML; Hoogeman M; Schillemans W; Heijmen B
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Aug; 58(15):5317-32. PubMed ID: 23863718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determining intrafractional prostate motion using four dimensional ultrasound system.
Baker M; Behrens CF
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():484. PubMed ID: 27422044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Internal target volume for post-hysterectomy vaginal recurrences of cervical cancers during image-guided radiotherapy.
Upasani MN; Chopra S; Engineer R; Mahantshetty U; Medhi S; Mehta Z; Shrivastava SK
Br J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 88(1054):20140783. PubMed ID: 26248870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of ultrasound probe pressure on uterine positional displacement in gynecologic cancer patients.
Baker M; Juhler-Nøttrup T; Behrens CF
Womens Health (Lond); 2014 Nov; 10(6):583-90. PubMed ID: 25482485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cervix and vagina in women with uterine malformations.
Bermejo C; Martínez-Ten P; Recio M; Ruiz-López L; Díaz D; Illescas T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 43(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 23754235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Daily ultrasound-based image-guided targeting for radiotherapy of upper abdominal malignancies.
Fuss M; Salter BJ; Cavanaugh SX; Fuss C; Sadeghi A; Fuller CD; Ameduri A; Hevezi JM; Herman TS; Thomas CR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jul; 59(4):1245-56. PubMed ID: 15234062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasonography in volume estimation of cervical carcinoma.
Chou CY; Hsu KF; Wang ST; Huang SC; Tzeng CC; Huang KE
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Jul; 66(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 9234927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictive factors of uterine movement during definitive radiotherapy for cervical cancer.
Maemoto H; Toita T; Ariga T; Heianna J; Yamashiro T; Murayama S
J Radiat Res; 2017 May; 58(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 27744403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interfractional variation in bladder volume and its impact on cervical cancer radiotherapy: Clinical significance of portable bladder scanner.
Luo H; Jin F; Yang D; Wang Y; Li C; Guo M; Ran X; Liu X; Zhou Q; Wu Y
Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4412. PubMed ID: 27370156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Classification of Uterine Anomalies by 3-Dimensional Ultrasonography Using ESHRE/ESGE Criteria: Interobserver Variability.
Bermejo C; Martínez-Ten P; Ruíz-López L; Estévez M; Gil MM
Reprod Sci; 2018 May; 25(5):740-747. PubMed ID: 28847221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Toward an individualized target motion management for IMRT of cervical cancer based on model-predicted cervix-uterus shape and position.
Bondar L; Hoogeman M; Mens JW; Dhawtal G; de Pree I; Ahmad R; Quint S; Heijmen B
Radiother Oncol; 2011 May; 99(2):240-5. PubMed ID: 21549441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surface refraction of sound waves affects calibration of three-dimensional ultrasound.
Ballhausen H; Ballhausen BD; Lachaine M; Li M; Parodi K; Belka C; Reiner M
Radiat Oncol; 2015 May; 10():119. PubMed ID: 26014494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interfractional variation in position of the uterus during radical radiotherapy for cervical cancer.
Huh SJ; Park W; Han Y
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Apr; 71(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 15066298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A margin-of-the-day online adaptive intensity-modulated radiotherapy strategy for cervical cancer provides superior treatment accuracy compared to clinically recommended margins: a dosimetric evaluation.
Ahmad R; Bondar L; Voet P; Mens JW; Quint S; Dhawtal G; Heijmen B; Hoogeman M
Acta Oncol; 2013 Oct; 52(7):1430-6. PubMed ID: 23902275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trans-abdominal ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) correlation for conformal intracavitary brachytherapy in carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Mahantshetty U; Khanna N; Swamidas J; Engineer R; Thakur MH; Merchant NH; Deshpande DD; Shrivastava S
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):130-4. PubMed ID: 21885140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
