These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

482 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27452342)

  • 1. Direct versus indirect inlay/onlay composite restorations in posterior teeth. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Angeletaki F; Gkogkos A; Papazoglou E; Kloukos D
    J Dent; 2016 Oct; 53():12-21. PubMed ID: 27452342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No difference in the long-term clinical performance of direct and indirect inlay/onlay composite restorations in posterior teeth.
    Dhadwal AS; Hurst D
    Evid Based Dent; 2017 Dec; 18(4):121-122. PubMed ID: 29269819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 10785294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: a systematic review.
    Fron Chabouis H; Smail Faugeron V; Attal JP
    Dent Mater; 2013 Dec; 29(12):1209-18. PubMed ID: 24119328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root filled teeth.
    Fedorowicz Z; Carter B; de Souza RF; Chaves CA; Nasser M; Sequeira-Byron P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 May; (5):CD009109. PubMed ID: 22592736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical outcome of bonded partial indirect posterior restorations on vital and non-vital teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dioguardi M; Alovisi M; Troiano G; Caponio CVA; Baldi A; Rocca GT; Comba A; Lo Muzio L; Scotti N
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Dec; 25(12):6597-6621. PubMed ID: 34628547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longevity of direct and indirect resin composite restorations in permanent posterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    da Veiga AM; Cunha AC; Ferreira DM; da Silva Fidalgo TK; Chianca TK; Reis KR; Maia LC
    J Dent; 2016 Nov; 54():1-12. PubMed ID: 27523636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root-filled teeth.
    Sequeira-Byron P; Fedorowicz Z; Carter B; Nasser M; Alrowaili EF
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; 2015(9):CD009109. PubMed ID: 26403154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A five-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite resin restorations in posterior teeth.
    Cetin AR; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):E1-11. PubMed ID: 23215545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal seal comparisons between resin-bonded Class II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restorations, and direct composite resin inlays.
    Shortall AC; Baylis RL; Baylis MA; Grundy JR
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 2699418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography.
    Türk AG; Sabuncu M; Ünal S; Önal B; Ulusoy M
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2016; 24(4):383-90. PubMed ID: 27556210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ceramic inlays for restoring posterior teeth.
    Hayashi M; Yeung CA
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (1):CD003450. PubMed ID: 12535474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical longevity of direct and indirect posterior resin composite restorations: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Josic U; D'Alessandro C; Miletic V; Maravic T; Mazzitelli C; Jacimovic J; Sorrentino R; Zarone F; Mancuso E; Delgado AH; Breschi L; Mazzoni A
    Dent Mater; 2023 Dec; 39(12):1085-1094. PubMed ID: 37827872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical performance of direct composite resin versus indirect restorations on endodontically treated posterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    de Kuijper MCFM; Cune MS; Özcan M; Gresnigt MMM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):295-306. PubMed ID: 34980474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: resin composite.
    Sharif MO; Catleugh M; Merry A; Tickle M; Dunne SM; Brunton P; Aggarwal VR; Chong LY
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Feb; 2014(2):CD005971. PubMed ID: 24510679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth.
    Manhart J; Neuerer P; Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A; Hickel R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11005901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complications and survival rates of inlays and onlays vs complete coverage restorations: A systematic review and analysis of studies.
    Vagropoulou GI; Klifopoulou GL; Vlahou SG; Hirayama H; Michalakis K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2018 Nov; 45(11):903-920. PubMed ID: 30019391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical study of indirect composite resin inlays in posterior stress-bearing cavities placed by dental students: results after 4 years.
    Huth KC; Chen HY; Mehl A; Hickel R; Manhart J
    J Dent; 2011 Jul; 39(7):478-88. PubMed ID: 21554920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.