BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27452786)

  • 1. Driving with central field loss III: vehicle control.
    Bronstad PM; Albu A; Goldstein R; Peli E; Bowers AR
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Sep; 99(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 27452786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Glaucomatous visual fields and neurocognitive function are independently associated with poor lane maintenance during driving simulation.
    Anderson DE; Bader JP; Boes EA; Gagrani M; Smith LM; Ndulue JK; Kedar S; Gulati V; Ghate DA; Rizzo M
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):419. PubMed ID: 33081721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Driving with hemianopia, II: lane position and steering in a driving simulator.
    Bowers AR; Mandel AJ; Goldstein RB; Peli E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Dec; 51(12):6605-13. PubMed ID: 20671269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling driver's braking and steering behavior along horizontal curves of two-lane rural highways for ADAS applications.
    Choudhari T; Maji A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(7):404-409. PubMed ID: 35862932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Driving with central field loss I: effect of central scotomas on responses to hazards.
    Bronstad PM; Bowers AR; Albu A; Goldstein R; Peli E
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Mar; 131(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 23329309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effects of Age, Distraction, and Simulated Central Vision Impairment on Hazard Detection in a Driving Simulator.
    Zhang CT; Bowers AR; Savage SW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Apr; 97(4):239-248. PubMed ID: 32304533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying cognitive distraction using steering wheel reversal rates.
    Kountouriotis GK; Spyridakos P; Carsten OMJ; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():39-45. PubMed ID: 27497055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Driving performance of drivers with impaired central visual field acuity.
    Lamble D; Summala H; Hyvärinen L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2002 Sep; 34(5):711-6. PubMed ID: 12214966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of driving in older subjects with and without age-related macular degeneration.
    Szlyk JP; Pizzimenti CE; Fishman GA; Kelsch R; Wetzel LC; Kagan S; Ho K
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1995 Aug; 113(8):1033-40. PubMed ID: 7639654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of visual field defects on driving performance: a driving simulator study.
    Coeckelbergh TR; Brouwer WH; Cornelissen FW; Van Wolffelaar P; Kooijman AC
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Nov; 120(11):1509-16. PubMed ID: 12427065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 'I didn't see that coming': simulated visual fields and driving hazard perception test performance.
    Glen FC; Smith ND; Jones L; Crabb DP
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Sep; 99(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 27489171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On-road driving with moderate visual field loss.
    Bowers A; Peli E; Elgin J; McGwin G; Owsley C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 82(8):657-67. PubMed ID: 16127330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inter and intra-individual differences in steering wheel hand positions during a simulated driving task.
    Schiro J; Loslever P; Gabrielli F; Pudlo P
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(3):394-410. PubMed ID: 25403474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What is the difference in driver's lateral control ability during naturalistic distracted driving and normal driving? A case study on a real highway.
    Wang C; Li Z; Fu R; Guo Y; Yuan W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Apr; 125():98-105. PubMed ID: 30738295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The short-term effects of artificially-impaired binocular vision on driving performance.
    Molina R; Redondo B; Di Stasi LL; Anera RG; Vera J; Jiménez R
    Ergonomics; 2021 Feb; 64(2):212-224. PubMed ID: 32841064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Driving with Glaucoma: Task Performance and Gaze Movements.
    Kübler TC; Kasneci E; Rosenstiel W; Heister M; Aehling K; Nagel K; Schiefer U; Papageorgiou E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Nov; 92(11):1037-46. PubMed ID: 26501733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of fatigue on driving performance under different roadway geometries: a simulator study.
    Du H; Zhao X; Zhang X; Zhang Y; Rong J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(5):468-73. PubMed ID: 25310572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Steering Control in a Low-Cost Driving Simulator: A Case for the Role of Virtual Vehicle Cab.
    Mecheri S; Lobjois R
    Hum Factors; 2018 Aug; 60(5):719-734. PubMed ID: 29664680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characteristics of on-road driving performance of persons with central vision loss who use bioptic telescopes.
    Wood JM; McGwin G; Elgin J; Searcey K; Owsley C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 May; 54(5):3790-7. PubMed ID: 23640044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective, population-based study of the role of visual impairment in motor vehicle crashes among older drivers: the SEE study.
    Rubin GS; Ng ES; Bandeen-Roche K; Keyl PM; Freeman EE; West SK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 48(4):1483-91. PubMed ID: 17389475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.