These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27452786)

  • 21. Effect of visual impairment on driving.
    Wood JM; Troutbeck R
    Hum Factors; 1994 Sep; 36(3):476-87. PubMed ID: 7989052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Efficient driver drowsiness detection at moderate levels of drowsiness.
    Forsman PM; Vila BJ; Short RA; Mott CG; Van Dongen HP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():341-50. PubMed ID: 22647383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Age and visual impairment decrease driving performance as measured on a closed-road circuit.
    Wood JM
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 12502165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Agreement of driving simulator and on-road driving performance in patients with binocular visual field loss.
    Ungewiss J; Kübler T; Sippel K; Aehling K; Heister M; Rosenstiel W; Kasneci E; Papageorgiou E;
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 256(12):2429-2435. PubMed ID: 30251198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of age, speed and duration of monotonous driving task in traffic on the driver's useful visual field.
    Rogé J; Pébayle T; Lambilliotte E; Spitzenstetter F; Giselbrecht D; Muzet A
    Vision Res; 2004 Oct; 44(23):2737-44. PubMed ID: 15358068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of severe visual challenges on steering performance in visually healthy young drivers.
    Brooks JO; Tyrrell RA; Frank TA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 82(8):689-97. PubMed ID: 16127334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Driving performance of glaucoma patients correlates with peripheral visual field loss.
    Szlyk JP; Mahler CL; Seiple W; Edward DP; Wilensky JT
    J Glaucoma; 2005 Apr; 14(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 15741817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Exploring driving characteristics of fit- and unfit-to-drive neurological patients: a driving simulator study.
    Motnikar L; Stojmenova K; Štaba UČ; Klun T; Robida KR; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(6):359-364. PubMed ID: 32421399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Vision and driving status of older Australians with cataract: an investigation of public hospital waiting lists.
    Keay L; Palagyi A; Do V; White A; Lamoureux E; Ivers RQ; Pesudovs K; Stapleton F; Boufous S; McCluskey P
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Sep; 99(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 27452648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Visual stabilization of posture in persons with central visual field loss.
    Turano KA; Dagnelie G; Herdman SJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jul; 37(8):1483-91. PubMed ID: 8675390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of superior and inferior visual field loss on hazard detection in a computer-based driving test.
    Glen FC; Smith ND; Crabb DP
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 May; 99(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25425712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Current licensing authority standards for peripheral visual field and safe on-road senior aged automobile driving performance.
    Silveira S; Jolly N; Heard R; Clunas NJ; Kay L
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007; 35(7):612-20. PubMed ID: 17894680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Central and paracentral visual field defects and driving abilities.
    Petzold A; Plant GT
    Ophthalmologica; 2005; 219(4):191-201. PubMed ID: 16088237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Driving with Central Visual Field Loss II: How Scotomas above or below the Preferred Retinal Locus (PRL) Affect Hazard Detection in a Driving Simulator.
    Bronstad PM; Albu A; Bowers AR; Goldstein R; Peli E
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136517. PubMed ID: 26332315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A mathematical model for predicting lane changes using the steering wheel angle.
    Schmidt K; Beggiato M; Hoffmann KH; Krems JF
    J Safety Res; 2014 Jun; 49():85-90. PubMed ID: 24913491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detecting lane departures from steering wheel signal.
    Sandström M; Lampsijärvi E; Holmström A; Maconi G; Ahmadzai S; Meriläinen A; Hæggström E; Forsman P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):272-278. PubMed ID: 27988449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Visual attention measures predict pedestrian detection in central field loss: a pilot study.
    Alberti CF; Horowitz T; Bronstad PM; Bowers AR
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89381. PubMed ID: 24558495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Older driver distraction: a naturalistic study of behaviour at intersections.
    Charlton JL; Catchlove M; Scully M; Koppel S; Newstead S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():271-8. PubMed ID: 23332726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Elderly drivers and simulated visual impairment.
    Wood JM; Troutbeck R
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Feb; 72(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 7753525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Visual impairment and road traffic accidents among drivers in Jimma Town, Southwest Ethiopia.
    Biza M; Mossie A; Woldemichael K; Gelaw Y
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 24079156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.