197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27454498)
1. Interobserver Agreement and Intraobserver Reproducibility of Barzullah Working Classification of Distal End Radius Fractures among Orthopaedic Residents.
Kamal Y; Khan HA; Gani NU; Farooq M; Shah AB; Khan MA
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol; 2016 Feb; 21(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 27454498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the cooney classification of distal radius fractures between experienced orthopaedic surgeons.
Jin WJ; Jiang LS; Shen L; Lu H; Cui YM; Zhou Q; Dai LY
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2007 Oct; 32(5):509-11. PubMed ID: 17950210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Classification of distal radius fractures: an analysis of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility.
Andersen DJ; Blair WF; Steyers CM; Adams BD; el-Khouri GY; Brandser EA
J Hand Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 21(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 8842946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of simplified Frykman and AO classifications of fractures of the distal radius. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver agreement.
Illarramendi A; González Della Valle A; Segal E; De Carli P; Maignon G; Gallucci G
Int Orthop; 1998; 22(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 9651777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and reproducibility of classifications for distal radius fractures.
Küçük L; Kumbaracı M; Günay H; Karapınar L; Ozdemir O
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2013; 47(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 23748613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An independent interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility evaluation of the new AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System.
Urrutia J; Zamora T; Yurac R; Campos M; Palma J; Mobarec S; Prada C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(1):E54-8. PubMed ID: 25341990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of two classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
Lauder AJ; Inda DJ; Bott AM; Clare MP; Fitzgibbons TC; Mormino MA
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Apr; 27(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 16624214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A retrospective evaluation of reliability and reproducibility of Arbeitsgemeinschaftfür Osteosynthesefragen classification and Fernandez classification for distal radius fracture.
Yinjie Y; Gen W; Hongbo W; Chongqing X; Fan Z; Yanqi F; Xuequn W; Wen M
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jan; 99(2):e18508. PubMed ID: 31914022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Classification of distal radius fractures in children: good inter- and intraobserver reliability, which improves with clinical experience.
Randsborg PH; Sivertsen EA
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 Jan; 13():6. PubMed ID: 22269925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are distal radius fracture classifications reproducible? Intra and interobserver agreement.
Belloti JC; Tamaoki MJ; Franciozi CE; Santos JB; Balbachevsky D; Chap Chap E; Albertoni WM; Faloppa F
Sao Paulo Med J; 2008 May; 126(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 18711658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variation Among Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons When Diagnosing and Treating Pediatric and Adolescent Distal Radius Fractures.
Dua K; Stein MK; O'Hara NN; Brighton BK; Hennrikus WL; Herman MJ; Lawrence JT; Mehlman CT; Otsuka NY; Shrader MW; Smith BG; Sponseller PD; Abzug JM
J Pediatr Orthop; 2019 Jul; 39(6):306-313. PubMed ID: 31169751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the reliability of classification systems used for distal radius fractures.
Kural C; Sungur I; Kaya I; Ugras A; Ertürk A; Cetinus E
Orthopedics; 2010 Nov; 33(11):801. PubMed ID: 21053882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the Fernandez classification for distal radius fractures.
Naqvi SG; Reynolds T; Kitsis C
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2009 Aug; 34(4):483-5. PubMed ID: 19321533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distal radius fractures are difficult to classify.
Wæver D; Madsen ML; Rölfing JHD; Borris LC; Henriksen M; Nagel LL; Thorninger R
Injury; 2018 Jun; 49 Suppl 1():S29-S32. PubMed ID: 29929689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Teaching the Basics: Development and Validation of a Distal Radius Reduction and Casting Model.
Seeley MA; Fabricant PD; Lawrence JTR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Sep; 475(9):2298-2305. PubMed ID: 28374350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Impact of Three-Dimensional CT Imaging on Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of Proximal Humeral Fracture Classifications and Treatment Recommendations.
Berkes MB; Dines JS; Little MT; Garner MR; Shifflett GD; Lazaro LE; Wellman DS; Dines DM; Lorich DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Aug; 96(15):1281-1286. PubMed ID: 25100775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The comparative study of reliability and reproducibility of distal radius' fracture classification among: AO frykman and Fernandez classification systems.
Siripakarn Y; Niempoog S; Boontanapibul K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 Jan; 96(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 23720978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New classification of lunate fossa fractures of the distal radius.
Zhang J; Ji XR; Peng Y; Li JT; Zhang LH; Tang PF
J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Oct; 11(1):124. PubMed ID: 27765057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability and Reproducibility of the OTA/AO Classification for Humeral Shaft Fractures.
Mahabier KC; Van Lieshout EM; Van Der Schaaf BC; Roukema GR; Punt BJ; Verhofstad MH; Den Hartog D
J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Mar; 31(3):e75-e80. PubMed ID: 27755334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distal clavicle fractures: A new classification system.
Cho CH; Kim BS; Kim DH; Choi CH; Dan J; Lee H
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Dec; 104(8):1231-1235. PubMed ID: 30393071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
