185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27454539)
1. Risk of Implant Loosening After Cyclic Loading of Fusionless Growth Modulation Techniques: Nitinol Staples Versus Flexible Tether.
Yaszay B; Doan JD; Parvaresh KC; Farnsworth CL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Apr; 42(7):443-449. PubMed ID: 27454539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A biomechanical assessment of thoracic spine stapling.
Puttlitz CM; Masaru F; Barkley A; Diab M; Acaroglu E
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):766-71. PubMed ID: 17414910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a lumbar intervertebral spacer with integrated screws as a stand-alone fixation device.
Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Turner JL; Castro CA; Armstrong WD; Waugh LG; Dryer RF
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Jul; 23(5):351-8. PubMed ID: 20084028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of paracoccygeal transsacral fixation.
Akesen B; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 18418135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of constrained dual-screw anchorage on holding strength and the resistance to cyclic loading in anterior spinal deformity surgery: a comparative biomechanical study.
Koller H; Fierlbeck J; Auffarth A; Niederberger A; Stephan D; Hitzl W; Augat P; Zenner J; Blocher M; Blocher M; Resch H; Mayer M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(6):E390-8. PubMed ID: 24384666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spinal growth modulation with an anterolateral flexible tether in an immature bovine model: disc health and motion preservation.
Newton PO; Farnsworth CL; Faro FD; Mahar AT; Odell TR; Mohamad F; Breisch E; Fricka K; Upasani VV; Amiel D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(7):724-33. PubMed ID: 18379398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preclinical testing of a wedge-rod system for fusionless correction of scoliosis.
Betz RR; Cunningham B; Selgrath C; Drewry T; Sherman MC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S275-8. PubMed ID: 14560203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws.
Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanics of transvertebral screw fixation in the thoracic spine: an in vitro study.
Rodriguez-Martinez NG; Savardekar A; Nottmeier EW; Pirris S; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Mendes GA; Kalb S; Theodore N; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 27035506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of translaminar versus pedicle screws at T1 and T2 in long subaxial cervical constructs.
McGirt MJ; Sutter EG; Xu R; Sciubba DM; Wolinsky JP; Witham TF; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A
Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):167-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 19934991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spinal growth modulation with use of a tether in an immature porcine model.
Newton PO; Upasani VV; Farnsworth CL; Oka R; Chambers RC; Dwek J; Kim JR; Perry A; Mahar AT
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Dec; 90(12):2695-706. PubMed ID: 19047716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intermediate screws in short segment pedicular fixation for thoracic and lumbar fractures: a biomechanical study.
Anekstein Y; Brosh T; Mirovsky Y
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb; 20(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 17285056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical testing of a unique built-in expandable anterior spinal internal fixation system.
Zhou CS; Xu YF; Zhang Y; Chen Z; Lv H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Dec; 15():424. PubMed ID: 25496488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis.
Chen CS; Huang CH; Shih SL
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Apr; 16():81. PubMed ID: 25880231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. T9 versus T10 as the upper instrumented vertebra for correction of adult deformity-rationale and recommendations.
Hey HWD; Tan KA; Neo CS; Lau ET; Choong DA; Lau LL; Liu GK; Wong HK
Spine J; 2017 May; 17(5):615-621. PubMed ID: 27856380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anterior vertebral screw strain with and without solid interspace support.
Spiegel DA; Cunningham BW; Oda I; Dormans JP; McAfee PC; Drummond DS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Nov; 25(21):2755-61. PubMed ID: 11064520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A biomechanical comparison of different types of lumbopelvic fixation.
Tis JE; Helgeson M; Lehman RA; Dmitriev AE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(24):E866-72. PubMed ID: 19910754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
