447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27454633)
21. Quality and readability of websites for patient information on tonsillectomy and sleep apnea.
Chi E; Jabbour N; Aaronson NL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jul; 98():1-3. PubMed ID: 28583484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A quality and readability comparison of artificial intelligence and popular health website education materials for common hand surgery procedures.
Pohl NB; Derector E; Rivlin M; Bachoura A; Tosti R; Kachooei AR; Beredjiklian PK; Fletcher DJ
Hand Surg Rehabil; 2024 Jun; 43(3):101723. PubMed ID: 38782361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Readability of Online Patient Educational Materials Related to Breast Lesions Requiring Surgery.
Miles RC; Baird GL; Choi P; Falomo E; Dibble EH; Garg M
Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 30694156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Does the quality, accuracy, and readability of information about lateral epicondylitis on the internet vary with the search term used?
Dy CJ; Taylor SA; Patel RM; McCarthy MM; Roberts TR; Daluiski A
Hand (N Y); 2012 Dec; 7(4):420-5. PubMed ID: 24294163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Separating the Wheat From the Chaff: An Evaluation of Readability, Quality, and Accuracy of Online Health Information for Treatment of Peyronie Disease.
Bompastore NJ; Cisu T; Holoch P
Urology; 2018 Aug; 118():59-64. PubMed ID: 29723588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Otoplasty Online Information: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Websites and Videos that Patients View Regarding Cosmetic Ear Surgery.
Nissan ME; Gupta A; Rayess H; Black KZ; Carron M
Facial Plast Surg; 2018 Feb; 34(1):82-87. PubMed ID: 29278863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Patient-targeted websites on overactive bladder: What are our patients reading?
Clancy AA; Hickling D; Didomizio L; Sanaee M; Shehata F; Zee R; Khalil H
Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Feb; 37(2):832-841. PubMed ID: 28762549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Readability of websites containing information on dental implants.
Jayaratne YS; Anderson NK; Zwahlen RA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1319-24. PubMed ID: 24148074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.
Reynolds M; Hoi A; Buchanan RRC
Lupus; 2018 Oct; 27(12):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 30114969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Can consumers trust web-based information about celiac disease? Accuracy, comprehensiveness, transparency, and readability of information on the internet.
McNally SL; Donohue MC; Newton KP; Ogletree SP; Conner KK; Ingegneri SE; Kagnoff MF
Interact J Med Res; 2012 Apr; 1(1):e1. PubMed ID: 23611901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An analysis of cluster headache information provided on internet websites.
Peterlin BL; Gambini-Suarez E; Lidicker J; Levin M
Headache; 2008 Mar; 48(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 18005143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cross sectional analysis of scoliosis-specific information on the internet: potential for patient confusion and misinformation.
Truumees D; Duncan A; Mayer EK; Geck M; Singh D; Truumees E
Spine Deform; 2020 Dec; 8(6):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 32578159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Is the Internet a Suitable Patient Resource for Information on Common Radiological Investigations?: Radiology-Related Information on the Internet.
Bowden DJ; Yap LC; Sheppard DG
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):826-830. PubMed ID: 28216191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the Informational Content and Readability of US Lung Cancer Screening Program Websites.
Gagne SM; Fintelmann FJ; Flores EJ; McDermott S; Mendoza DP; Petranovic M; Price MC; Stowell JT; Little BP
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jan; 3(1):e1920431. PubMed ID: 32003825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Will the Effect of New Federal Breast Density Legislation Be Diminished by Currently Available Online Patient Educational Materials?
Miles RC; Choi P; Baird GL; Dibble EH; Lamb L; Garg M; Lehman C
Acad Radiol; 2020 Oct; 27(10):1400-1405. PubMed ID: 31839567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. How evidence-based is the information on the internet about nausea and vomiting of pregnancy?
Sacks S; Abenhaim HA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Aug; 35(8):697-703. PubMed ID: 24007704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A North American perspective of content and quality of websites in the English language on childhood-onset lupus erythematosus.
Cutler C; Peng T; Stinson J; Tucker L; Boneparth A; Klein Gitelman M; Moorthy LN
Lupus; 2018 Apr; 27(5):762-770. PubMed ID: 29256340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy and Reliability of Internet Resources Providing Information on Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
Lee J; Ban WH; Park HK; Na E; Kim SK; Kang HH; Lee SH
J Clin Sleep Med; 2018 Oct; 14(10):1717-1723. PubMed ID: 30353804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. All I Have Learned, I Have Learned from Google: Why Today's Facial Rejuvenation Patients are Prone to Misinformation, and the Steps We can take to Contend with Unreliable Information.
Mehta N; Gupta A; Nissan M
Facial Plast Surg; 2019 Aug; 35(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 31412380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.
San Giorgi MRM; de Groot OSD; Dikkers FG
Laryngoscope; 2017 Oct; 127(10):2293-2297. PubMed ID: 28233911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
