These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27455187)

  • 21. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.
    Wykowska A; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Examining Rey Complex Figure Test organization in healthy adults.
    Wilson NA; Batchelor J
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2015; 37(10):1052-61. PubMed ID: 26325340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development of dynamic attention: Time-based visual selection for objects in motion between 6-12 years of age.
    Zupan Z; Blagrove EL; Watson DG
    Dev Psychol; 2023 Feb; 59(2):312-325. PubMed ID: 36136786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hierarchical forms processing in adults and children.
    Harrison TB; Stiles J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Jun; 103(2):222-40. PubMed ID: 18973909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Running the figure to the ground: figure-ground segmentation during visual search.
    Ralph BC; Seli P; Cheng VO; Solman GJ; Smilek D
    Vision Res; 2014 Apr; 97():65-73. PubMed ID: 24582768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Trajectories of attentional development: an exploration with the master activation map model.
    Michael GA; Lété B; Ducrot S
    Dev Psychol; 2013 Apr; 49(4):615-31. PubMed ID: 22582834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Collinearity impairs local element visual search.
    Jingling L; Tseng CH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):156-67. PubMed ID: 22329767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Does the attentional state determine processing dominance in to-be-ignored compound stimuli?
    Paquet L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1994 Apr; 85(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 8209695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Beyond the forest and the trees: local and global interference in hierarchical visual stimuli containing three levels.
    Rijpkema M; van Aalderen S; Schwarzbach J; Verstraten FA
    Perception; 2007; 36(8):1115-22. PubMed ID: 17972477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contingent capture of involuntary visual spatial attention does not differ between normally hearing children and proficient cochlear implant users.
    Kamke MR; Van Luyn J; Constantinescu G; Harris J
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2014; 32(6):799-811. PubMed ID: 25201816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Selective search for conjunctively defined targets by children and young adults.
    Merrill EC; Lookadoo R
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2004 Sep; 89(1):72-90. PubMed ID: 15336919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multi-modal distraction: insights from children's limited attention.
    Matusz PJ; Broadbent H; Ferrari J; Forrest B; Merkley R; Scerif G
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():156-65. PubMed ID: 25497524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Inter-trial inhibition of attention to features is modulated by task relevance.
    Levinthal BR; Lleras A
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):12.1-15. PubMed ID: 19146296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The development of analogy making in children: cognitive load and executive functions.
    Thibaut JP; French R; Vezneva M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2010 May; 106(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 20153481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Auditory and visual differences in time perception? An investigation from a developmental perspective with neuropsychological tests.
    Zélanti PS; Droit-Volet S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Jul; 112(3):296-311. PubMed ID: 22621934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Searching for life motion signals. Visual search asymmetry in local but not global biological-motion processing.
    Wang L; Zhang K; He S; Jiang Y
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Aug; 21(8):1083-9. PubMed ID: 20581341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effects of training and transfer on global/local processing.
    Dulaney CL; Marks W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jun; 125(2):203-20. PubMed ID: 16914108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Avoiding the potential pitfalls of using negative priming tasks in developmental studies: assessing inhibitory control in children, adolescents, and adults.
    Pritchard VE; Neumann E
    Dev Psychol; 2009 Jan; 45(1):272-83. PubMed ID: 19210008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Gestalt perception and the decline of global precedence in older subjects.
    Staudinger MR; Fink GR; Mackay CE; Lux S
    Cortex; 2011; 47(7):854-62. PubMed ID: 20828678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of internal and external validity criteria for a computerized visual search task: A pilot study.
    Richard's MM; Introzzi I; Zamora E; Vernucci S
    Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2017; 6(2):110-119. PubMed ID: 27050094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.