These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27455187)

  • 41. Attending to spatial locations: a developmental study.
    Lane DM; Pearson DA
    Child Dev; 1983 Feb; 54(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 6831991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Measuring search efficiency in complex visual search tasks: global and local clutter.
    Beck MR; Lohrenz MC; Trafton JG
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Sep; 16(3):238-50. PubMed ID: 20853984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A comparative analysis of global and local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in young children (Homo sapiens) and monkeys (Cebus apella).
    De Lillo C; Spinozzi G; Truppa V; Naylor DM
    J Comp Psychol; 2005 May; 119(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 15982159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effects of saliency, not global dominance, in patients with left parietal damage.
    Mevorach C; Humphreys GW; Shalev L
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(2):307-19. PubMed ID: 15936046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.
    Schubö A; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Learning by selection: visual search and object perception in young infants.
    Amso D; Johnson SP
    Dev Psychol; 2006 Nov; 42(6):1236-45. PubMed ID: 17087555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Responses to Navon tasks differ across development and between tasks with differing attentional demands.
    Morris S; Dumontheil I; Farran EK
    Vision Res; 2021 Aug; 185():17-28. PubMed ID: 33878639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Impaired top-down control of visual search in schizophrenia.
    Gold JM; Fuller RL; Robinson BM; Braun EL; Luck SJ
    Schizophr Res; 2007 Aug; 94(1-3):148-55. PubMed ID: 17544632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Perceptual load influences selective attention across development.
    Couperus JW
    Dev Psychol; 2011 Sep; 47(5):1431-9. PubMed ID: 21688896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. No disadvantage for the processing of global visual features in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
    Moritz S; Wendt M; Jelinek L; Ruhe C; Arzola GM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2008 May; 14(3):489-93. PubMed ID: 18419847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Conditions of directed attention inhibit recognition performance for explicitly presented target-aligned irrelevant stimuli.
    Dewald AD; Sinnett S; Doumas LA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 21679910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Neural mechanisms of global/local processing of bilateral visual inputs: an ERP study.
    Jiang Y; Han S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1444-54. PubMed ID: 15978507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Visual search and contextual cueing: differential effects in 10-year-old children and adults.
    Couperus JW; Hunt RH; Nelson CA; Thomas KM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):334-48. PubMed ID: 21264739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Age-related differences in audiovisual interactions of semantically different stimuli.
    Viggiano MP; Giovannelli F; Giganti F; Rossi A; Metitieri T; Rebai M; Guerrini R; Cincotta M
    Dev Psychol; 2017 Jan; 53(1):138-148. PubMed ID: 27893235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Differential processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in young and older healthy adults: implications for pathology.
    Lux S; Marshall JC; Thimm M; Fink GR
    Cortex; 2008 Jan; 44(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 18387528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes.
    Lamy D; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Does aging affect the allocation of visual attention in global and local information processing?
    Roux F; Ceccaldi M
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Aug; 46(3):383-96. PubMed ID: 11487288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Framing the area: An efficient approach for avoiding visual interference and optimising visual search in adolescents.
    Bouhassoun S; Gerlach C; Borst G; Poirel N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Nov; 75(11):2012-2022. PubMed ID: 34812112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Electrophysiological indices of spatial attention during global/local processing in good and poor phonological decoders.
    Matthews AJ; Martin FH
    Brain Lang; 2009 Dec; 111(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 19828188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.