BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1021 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27455499)

  • 1. Out-of-field doses and neutron dose equivalents for electron beams from modern Varian and Elekta linear accelerators.
    Cardenas CE; Nitsch PL; Kudchadker RJ; Howell RM; Kry SF
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):442-455. PubMed ID: 27455499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Photonuclear dose calculations for high-energy photon beams from Siemens and Varian linacs.
    Chibani O; Ma CM
    Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):1990-2000. PubMed ID: 12945965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experimental assessment of out-of-field dose components in high energy electron beams used in external beam radiotherapy.
    Alabdoaburas MM; Mege JP; Chavaudra J; Bezin JV; Veres A; de Vathaire F; Lefkopoulos D; Diallo I
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):435–448. PubMed ID: 26699572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scattered radiation from applicators in clinical electron beams.
    van Battum LJ; van der Zee W; Huizenga H
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Aug; 48(15):2493-507. PubMed ID: 12953911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monte Carlo study of in-field and out-of-field dose distributions from a linear accelerator operating with and without a flattening-filter.
    Almberg SS; Frengen J; Lindmo T
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5194-203. PubMed ID: 22894444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of an extra-focal electron source to model collimator-scattered electrons using the pencil-beam redefinition algorithm.
    Boyd RA; Hogstrom KR; White RA; Antolak JA
    Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2571-83. PubMed ID: 12462724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The peripheral dose outside the applicator in electron beams of Oncor linear accelerator.
    Iktueren B; Bilge H; Karacam S; Atkovar G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jun; 150(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 22025738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are neutrons responsible for the dose discrepancies between Monte Carlo calculations and measurements in the build-up region for a high-energy photon beam?
    Ding GX; Duzenli C; Kalach NI
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3251-61. PubMed ID: 12361221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Measurement of peak correction factor of Farmer chamber for calibration of flattening filter free (FFF) clinical photon beams].
    Kontra G; Major T; Polgár C
    Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 26035159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Out-of-field photon and neutron dose equivalents from step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Kry SF; Salehpour M; Followill DS; Stovall M; Kuban DA; White RA; Rosen II
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(4):1204-16. PubMed ID: 15990026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Superheated drop detector for determination of neutron dose equivalent to patients undergoing high-energy x-ray and electron radiotherapy.
    Nath R; Meigooni AS; King CR; Smolen S; d'Errico F
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(3):781-7. PubMed ID: 8350837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flattening filter free beams in SBRT and IMRT: dosimetric assessment of peripheral doses.
    Kragl G; Baier F; Lutz S; Albrich D; Dalaryd M; Kroupa B; Wiezorek T; Knöös T; Georg D
    Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):91-101. PubMed ID: 20888199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monte Carlo modeling of a 6 and 18 MV Varian Clinac medical accelerator for in-field and out-of-field dose calculations: development and validation.
    Bednarz B; Xu XG
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):N43-57. PubMed ID: 19141879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monte Carlo dose calculation improvements for low energy electron beams using eMC.
    Fix MK; Frei D; Volken W; Neuenschwander H; Born EJ; Manser P
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4577-88. PubMed ID: 20668339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating in-field and out-of-field neutron contamination in high-energy medical linear accelerators based on the treatment factors of field size, depth, beam modifiers, and beam type.
    Biltekin F; Yeginer M; Ozyigit G
    Phys Med; 2015 Jul; 31(5):517-23. PubMed ID: 25873196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The peripheral dose outside the applicator in electron beams of an Elekta linear accelerator.
    Haghparast A; Amiri F; Yarahmadi M; Rezaei M
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2018 Sep; 41(3):647-655. PubMed ID: 29943310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Study on the measurement of photo-neutron for15 MV photon beam from medical linear accelerator under different irradiation geometries using passive detectors.
    Thekkedath SC; Raman RG; Musthafa MM; Bakshi AK; Pal R; Dawn S; Kummali AH; Huilgol NG; Selvam TP; Datta D
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2016; 12(2):1060-4. PubMed ID: 27461699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of build-up dose between Elekta and Varian linear accelerators for high-energy photon beams using radiochromic film and clinical implications for IMRT head and neck treatments.
    Paelinck L; De Wagter C; Van Esch A; Duthoy W; Depuydt T; De Neve W
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Feb; 50(3):413-28. PubMed ID: 15773720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neutron dose equivalent and neutron spectra in tissue for clinical linacs operating at 15, 18 and 20 MV.
    Martínez-Ovalle SA; Barquero R; Gómez-Ros JM; Lallena AM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):498-511. PubMed ID: 21233098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of Photoneutron Dose Measured by Bubble Detectors in Conventional Linacs and Cyberknife Unit: Effective Dose and Secondary Malignancy Risk Estimation.
    Biltekin F; Yeginer M; Ozyigit G
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Aug; 15(4):560-5. PubMed ID: 26152750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 52.