322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27455837)
1. Assessment of dual-probe Her-2 fluorescent in situ hybridization in breast cancer by the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines produces more equivocal results than that by the 2007 ASCO/CAP guidelines.
Qian XL; Wen HY; Yang YL; Gu F; Guo XJ; Liu FF; Zhang L; Zhang XM; Fu L
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Aug; 159(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 27455837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Updated 2013 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing increase HER2 positive and HER2 equivocal breast cancer cases; retrospective study of HER2 FISH results of 836 invasive breast cancers.
Singh K; Tantravahi U; Lomme MM; Pasquariello T; Steinhoff M; Sung CJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jun; 157(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 27180259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of molecular subtypes for the increased HER2 equivocal cases caused by application of the updated 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer.
Guo L; Yuan P; Zhang J; Ling Y; Li W; Zhao B; Ying J; Xuan L
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 28712009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. HER2 FISH classification of equivocal HER2 IHC breast cancers with use of the 2013 ASCO/CAP practice guideline.
Fan YS; Casas CE; Peng J; Watkins M; Fan L; Chapman J; Ikpatt OF; Gomez C; Zhao W; Reis IM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 155(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 26895325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of the updated 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 FISH testing in invasive breast cancer: a retrospective study of HER2 fish results of 2233 cases.
Liu ZH; Wang K; Lin DY; Xu J; Chen J; Long XY; Ge Y; Luo XL; Zhang KP; Liu YH; Xu FP
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 May; 175(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 30712197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of an alternative chromosome 17 probe and the 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists guidelines on fluorescence in situ hybridization for the determination of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer.
Donaldson AR; Shetty S; Wang Z; Rivera CL; Portier BP; Budd GT; Downs-Kelly E; Lanigan CP; Calhoun BC
Cancer; 2017 Jun; 123(12):2230-2239. PubMed ID: 28192599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of Modified 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines on HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. One Year Experience.
Varga Z; Noske A
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140652. PubMed ID: 26473483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of repeat HER2 testing after initial equivocal HER2 FISH results using 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines.
Xu FP; Wang K; Xu J; Chen J; Zhang YF; Wu HM; Zhang MH; Long XX; Luo XL; Zhang KP; Lin DY; Liu YH
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):757-764. PubMed ID: 28861637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implications of the Updated 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Gene Testing Using Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Breast Cancer.
Lim TH; Lim AS; Thike AA; Tien SL; Tan PH
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Feb; 140(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 26910218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of the 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing of invasive breast carcinoma: a focus on tumours assessed as 'equivocal' for HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in-situ hybridization.
Bethune GC; Veldhuijzen van Zanten D; MacIntosh RF; Rayson D; Younis T; Thompson K; Barnes PJ
Histopathology; 2015 Dec; 67(6):880-7. PubMed ID: 25913507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Next-generation assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene (ERBB2) amplification status in invasive breast carcinoma: a focus on Group 4 by use of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 testing guideline.
Hoda RS; Bowman AS; Zehir A; Razavi P; Brogi E; Ladanyi M; Arcila ME; Wen HY; Ross DS
Histopathology; 2021 Mar; 78(4):498-507. PubMed ID: 32841416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [HER-2 oncogene amplification assessment in invasive breast cancer by dual-color in situ hybridization (dc-CISH): a comparative study with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)].
Akhdar A; Bronsard M; Lemieux R; Geha S
Ann Pathol; 2011 Dec; 31(6):472-9. PubMed ID: 22172120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 Guideline Updates on HER2 Assessment in Breast Cancer With Equivocal HER2 Immunohistochemistry Results With Focus on Cases With
Hoda RS; Brogi E; Xu J; Ventura K; Ross DS; Dang C; Robson M; Norton L; Morrow M; Wen HY
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2020 May; 144(5):597-601. PubMed ID: 31647316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of ERBB2/HER2 Status in HER2-Equivocal Breast Cancers by FISH and 2013/2014 ASCO-CAP Guidelines.
Press MF; Seoane JA; Curtis C; Quinaux E; Guzman R; Sauter G; Eiermann W; Mackey JR; Robert N; Pienkowski T; Crown J; Martin M; Valero V; Bee V; Ma Y; Villalobos I; Slamon DJ
JAMA Oncol; 2019 Mar; 5(3):366-375. PubMed ID: 30520947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Assessment of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer: a comparison of dual-color in-situ hybridization and fluorescence in-situ hybridization].
Xu Y; Yang W; Yang F; Lu Y; Cai X; Zhou X
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Apr; 43(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 24915811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 determination of invasive breast cancer: A single institution experience using frontline dual-color FISH.
Ragazzi M; Bisagni A; Gasparini E; Kuhn E; Bassano C; Tamagnini I; Foroni M; Bortesi M; Falco G; Ferrari G; Braglia L; Savoldi L; Bologna A; Di Cicilia R; Bisagni G; Gardini G
Breast; 2017 Aug; 34():65-72. PubMed ID: 28521178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the 2007 and 2013 ASCO/CAP evaluation systems for HER2 amplification in breast cancer.
Pu X; Shi J; Li Z; Feng A; Ye Q
Pathol Res Pract; 2015 Jun; 211(6):421-5. PubMed ID: 25818873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 interpretation in breast cancer: comparison with previous guidelines and clinical significance of the proposed in situ hybridization groups.
Woo JW; Lee K; Chung YR; Jang MH; Ahn S; Park SY
Hum Pathol; 2020 Apr; 98():10-21. PubMed ID: 32027910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. HER2 Testing for Breast Cancer in the Genomics Laboratory: A Sea Change for Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization.
Geiersbach KB; Sill DR; Meyer RG; Yuhas JA; Sukov WR; Mounajjed T; Carter JM; Jenkins RB; Chen B
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2021 Jul; 145(7):883-886. PubMed ID: 33112955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The New Equivocal: Changes to HER2 FISH Results When Applying the 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines.
Long TH; Lawce H; Durum C; Moore SR; Olson SB; Gatter K; Troxell ML
Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 Aug; 144(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 26185310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
