These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27455987)

  • 1. [The Freiburg monosyllabic test put to the test].
    Baljić I; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):538-9. PubMed ID: 27455987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Test-retest reliability of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test].
    Winkler A; Holube I
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):564-71. PubMed ID: 27286728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Phonemic balance of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test].
    Exter M; Winkler A; Holube I
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):557-63. PubMed ID: 27299891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The Freiburg speech intelligibility test : A pillar of speech audiometry in German-speaking countries].
    Hoth S
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):540-8. PubMed ID: 27259640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation of hearing aid rehabilitation using the Freiburg Monosyllabic Test].
    Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):589-94. PubMed ID: 27299893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Examination of a training effect in the Freiburg monosyllabic test].
    Schmidt T; Baljić I
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):584-8. PubMed ID: 27435273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Influence of hearing aids on monosyllabic test score and subjective everyday hearing].
    Thümmler R; Liebscher T; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):595-600. PubMed ID: 27126291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of the perceptual equivalence of test lists in the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test].
    Baljić I; Winkler A; Schmidt T; Holube I
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):572-83. PubMed ID: 27418349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The Freiburg monosyllable word test in postoperative cochlear implant diagnostics].
    Hey M; Brademann G; Ambrosch P
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):601-7. PubMed ID: 27393292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of different speech intelligibility tests in German language (Freiburg speech test vs. Göttingen sentence test and monosyllabic rhyme test)].
    Sukowski H; Brand T; Wagener KC; Kollmeier B
    HNO; 2009 Mar; 57(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 18696020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Use of Freiburg monosyllabic test words in the contemporary German language : Currentness of the test words].
    Steffens T
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):549-56. PubMed ID: 27286726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The adaptive Freiburg monosyllabic test in noise : Development of a procedure and comparison of the results with the Oldenburg sentence test].
    Memmeler T; Schönweiler R; Wollenberg B; Löhler J
    HNO; 2019 Feb; 67(2):118-125. PubMed ID: 30519714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Verification of normative values for the Swiss version of the Freiburg speech intelligibility test].
    Kompis M; Krebs M; Häusler R
    HNO; 2006 Jun; 54(6):445-50. PubMed ID: 16189713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of the ORCA nonsense syllable test.
    Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B; Peeters H; Keenan D
    Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):779-95. PubMed ID: 20622673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rasch analysis of word identification and magnitude estimation scaling responses in measuring naive listeners' judgments of speech intelligibility of children with severe-to-profound hearing impairments.
    Beltyukova SA; Stone GM; Ellis LW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1124-37. PubMed ID: 18664707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Examination of binaural amplification in children.
    Grimes AM; Mueller HG; Malley JD
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(5):208-10. PubMed ID: 7297785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functionally-based screening criteria for hearing-critical jobs based on the Hearing in Noise Test.
    Giguère C; Laroche C; Soli SD; Vaillancourt V
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):319-28. PubMed ID: 18569104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining perceived sound quality in a simulated hearing aid using the international speech test signal.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC; Moats P
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):533-5. PubMed ID: 21325947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Speech sound discrimination and hearing-aid performance of severely hearing impaired school children].
    Nakanishi Y
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1982 Apr; 85(4):422-31. PubMed ID: 7119926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.