These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27457095)

  • 1. Locally dispersing populations in heterogeneous dynamic landscapes with spatiotemporal correlations. II. Habitat driven by voter dynamics.
    Hiebeler DE; Hill JL
    J Theor Biol; 2016 Oct; 407():81-89. PubMed ID: 27457095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Locally dispersing populations in heterogeneous dynamic landscapes with spatiotemporal correlations. I. Block disturbance.
    Hiebeler DE; Houle J; Drummond F; Bilodeau P; Merckens J
    J Theor Biol; 2016 Oct; 407():212-224. PubMed ID: 27460587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Competing populations on fragmented landscapes with spatially structured heterogeneities: improved landscape generation and mixed dispersal strategies.
    Hiebeler DE
    J Math Biol; 2007 Mar; 54(3):337-56. PubMed ID: 17151885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anthropogenic landscape change promotes asymmetric dispersal and limits regional patch occupancy in a spatially structured bird population.
    Pavlacky DC; Possingham HP; Lowe AJ; Prentis PJ; Green DJ; Goldizen AW
    J Anim Ecol; 2012 Sep; 81(5):940-52. PubMed ID: 22489927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modelling the effects of spatial heterogeneity and temporal variation in extinction probability on mosquito populations.
    Alcalay Y; Tsurim I; Ovadia O
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Dec; 27(8):2342-2358. PubMed ID: 28851019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Formulating spread of species with habitat dependent growth and dispersal in heterogeneous landscapes.
    Ramanantoanina A; Hui C
    Math Biosci; 2016 May; 275():51-6. PubMed ID: 26968930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of static and dynamic spatially structured disturbances on a locally dispersing population.
    Hiebeler DE; Morin BR
    J Theor Biol; 2007 May; 246(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 17270218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of landscape-dependent disturbance and dispersal in metapopulation persistence.
    Elkin CM; Possingham H
    Am Nat; 2008 Oct; 172(4):563-75. PubMed ID: 18759558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Species persistence in landscapes with spatial variation in habitat quality: a pair approximation model.
    Liao J; Li Z; Hiebeler DE; Iwasa Y; Bogaert J; Nijs I
    J Theor Biol; 2013 Oct; 335():22-30. PubMed ID: 23792314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Habitat-mediated, density-dependent dispersal strategies affecting spatial dynamics of populations in an anthropogenically-modified landscape.
    Zhang H; Sun T; Xue S; Yang W; Shao D
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 625():1510-1517. PubMed ID: 29996447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metapopulation dynamics on ephemeral patches.
    Reigada C; Schreiber SJ; Altermatt F; Holyoak M
    Am Nat; 2015 Feb; 185(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 25616138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of corridors relative to enlargement of habitat patches.
    Falcy MR; Estades CF
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Oct; 21(5):1341-6. PubMed ID: 17883499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of habitat fragmentation on cyclic population dynamics: a numerical study.
    Strohm S; Tyson R
    Bull Math Biol; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1323-48. PubMed ID: 19352778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Species traits, patch turnover and successional dynamics: when does intermediate disturbance favour metapopulation occupancy?
    Mestre F; Pita R; Mira A; Beja P
    BMC Ecol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):2. PubMed ID: 31900154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Density-dependent population dynamics and dispersal in heterogeneous metapopulations.
    Strevens CM; Bonsall MB
    J Anim Ecol; 2011 Jan; 80(1):282-93. PubMed ID: 20964687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metapopulation models for extinction threshold in spatially correlated landscapes.
    Ovaskainen O; Sato K; Bascompte J; Hanski I
    J Theor Biol; 2002 Mar; 215(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 12051987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Habitat destruction in mutualistic metacommunities.
    Prakash S; de Roos AM
    Theor Popul Biol; 2004 Mar; 65(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 14766189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid viability analysis for metapopulations in dynamic habitat networks.
    Drechsler M; Johst K
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Jun; 277(1689):1889-97. PubMed ID: 20164097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial structure, environmental heterogeneity, and population dynamics: analysis of the coupled logistic map.
    Kendall BE; Fox GA
    Theor Popul Biol; 1998 Aug; 54(1):11-37. PubMed ID: 9680486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determinants of extinction-colonization dynamics in Mediterranean butterflies: the role of landscape, climate and local habitat features.
    Fernández-Chacón A; Stefanescu C; Genovart M; Nichols JD; Hines JE; Páramo F; Turco M; Oro D
    J Anim Ecol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):276-85. PubMed ID: 23957287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.