BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27457260)

  • 1. Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Perlis N; Sayyid R; Evans A; Van Der Kwast T; Toi A; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Ghai S; Fleshner NE
    J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 27457260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC;
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2136-41. PubMed ID: 12771735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Percent prostate needle biopsy tissue with cancer is more predictive of biochemical failure or adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen or Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Csathy GS; Dorey F; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Feb; 167(2 Pt 1):516-20. PubMed ID: 11792909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-Term Outcomes after Deferred Radical Prostatectomy in Men Initially Treated with Active Surveillance.
    Godtman RA; Schafferer M; Pihl CG; Stranne J; Hugosson J
    J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):779-785. PubMed ID: 29730198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3 + 4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance.
    Gearman DJ; Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Karnes RJ
    J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 29225057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
    Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?
    Aghazadeh MA; Frankel J; Belanger M; McLaughlin T; Tortora J; Staff I; Wagner JR
    J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1196-1201. PubMed ID: 29288120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pathological, oncologic and functional outcomes of radical prostatectomy following active surveillance.
    Satkunasivam R; Kulkarni GS; Zlotta AR; Kalnin R; Trachtenberg J; Fleshner NE; Hamilton RJ; Jewett MA; Finelli A
    J Urol; 2013 Jul; 190(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 23321581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors predicting prostatic biopsy Gleason sum under grading.
    Stackhouse DA; Sun L; Schroeck FR; Jayachandran J; Caire AA; Acholo CO; Robertson CN; Albala DM; Polascik TJ; Donatucci CF; Maloney KE; Moul JW
    J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):118-22; discussion 123-4. PubMed ID: 19447436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
    Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
    J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score as a Predictor of Adverse Pathology in Men on Active Surveillance.
    Kornberg Z; Cooperberg MR; Cowan JE; Chan JM; Shinohara K; Simko JP; Tenggara I; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 2019 Oct; 202(4):702-709. PubMed ID: 31026214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preoperative model for predicting prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy using percent of biopsy tissue with cancer, biopsy Gleason grade and serum prostate specific antigen.
    Freedland SJ; Terris MK; Csathy GS; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Presti JC; Dorey F; Aronson WJ;
    J Urol; 2004 Jun; 171(6 Pt 1):2215-20. PubMed ID: 15126788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adverse Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Gearman DJ; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):442-447. PubMed ID: 27574819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Impact of Repeat Prostate Biopsies on Oncologic, Pathological and Perioperative Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy.
    Rosenbaum CM; Mandel P; Tennstedt P; Boehm K; Chun FK; Graefen M; Heinzer H; Tilki D; Salomon G
    J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):103-108. PubMed ID: 27506693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
    Jin BS; Kang SH; Kim DY; Oh HG; Kim CI; Moon GH; Kwon TG; Park JS
    Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):624-9. PubMed ID: 26366274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved accuracy for predicting the Gleason score of prostate cancer by increasing the number of transrectal biopsy cores.
    Miyake H; Kurahashi T; Takenaka A; Hara I; Fujisawa M
    Urol Int; 2007; 79(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 18025846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
    Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Cooperberg MR; Terris MK; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
    Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25728968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score 9-10 on core biopsy: correlation with findings at radical prostatectomy and prognosis.
    Ellis CL; Partin AW; Han M; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2068-73. PubMed ID: 23727307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 68.