837 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27457625)
1. The Biotribology of PEEK-on-HXLPE Bearings Is Comparable to Traditional Bearings on a Multidirectional Pin-on-disk Tester.
Baykal D; Siskey RS; Underwood RJ; Briscoe A; Kurtz SM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2384-2393. PubMed ID: 27457625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are PEEK-on-Ceramic Bearings an Option for Total Disc Arthroplasty? An In Vitro Tribology Study.
Siskey R; Ciccarelli L; Lui MK; Kurtz SM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2428-2440. PubMed ID: 27677290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wear behaviour of CFR PEEK articulated against CoCr under varying contact stresses: Low wear of CFR PEEK negated by wear of the CoCr counterface.
Kandemir G; Smith S; Joyce TJ
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Sep; 97():117-125. PubMed ID: 31108368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wear properties of poly-ether-ether-ketone bearing combinations under zero and cross shear kinematics in total knee arthroplasty.
Chamberlain KA; Rankin KS; Briscoe A; Deehan D; Hyde PJ
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2019 Feb; 107(2):445-453. PubMed ID: 29732661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Biologic Response to Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Wear Particles in Total Joint Replacement: A Systematic Review.
Stratton-Powell AA; Pasko KM; Brockett CL; Tipper JL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2394-2404. PubMed ID: 27432420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Properties and Corrosion Performance of Self-reinforced Composite PEEK for Proposed Use as a Modular Taper Gasket.
Ouellette ES; Gilbert JL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2414-2427. PubMed ID: 27146655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is there a difference in total knee arthroplasty risk of revision in highly crosslinked versus conventional polyethylene?
Paxton EW; Inacio MC; Kurtz S; Love R; Cafri G; Namba RS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Mar; 473(3):999-1008. PubMed ID: 25567357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of contact pressure, cross-shear and counterface material on the wear of PEEK and CFR-PEEK for orthopaedic applications.
Brockett CL; Carbone S; Abdelgaied A; Fisher J; Jennings LM
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():10-16. PubMed ID: 27341286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Alternative bearing materials for intervertebral disc arthroplasty.
Grupp TM; Meisel HJ; Cotton JA; Schwiesau J; Fritz B; Blömer W; Jansson V
Biomaterials; 2010 Jan; 31(3):523-31. PubMed ID: 19815271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low wear rates seen in THAs with highly crosslinked polyethylene at 9 to 14 years in patients younger than age 50 years.
Garvin KL; White TC; Dusad A; Hartman CW; Martell J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3829-35. PubMed ID: 26122983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Wear and Friction of UHMWPE-on-PEEK OPTIMA™.
Cowie RM; Briscoe A; Fisher J; Jennings LM
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Jan; 89():65-71. PubMed ID: 30265867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do oxidized zirconium femoral heads reduce polyethylene wear in cemented THAs? A blinded randomized clinical trial.
Zaoui A; Hage SE; Langlois J; Scemama C; Courpied JP; Hamadouche M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3822-8. PubMed ID: 26113111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An investigation into PEEK-on-PEEK as a bearing surface candidate for cervical total disc replacement.
Kraft M; Koch DK; Bushelow M
Spine J; 2012 Jul; 12(7):603-11. PubMed ID: 22964013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does a PEEK Femoral TKA Implant Preserve Intact Femoral Surface Strains Compared With CoCr? A Preliminary Laboratory Study.
Rankin KE; Dickinson AS; Briscoe A; Browne M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2405-2413. PubMed ID: 27020431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wear Characteristics of Conventional Ultrahigh-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Versus Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Total Ankle Arthroplasty.
Schipper ON; Haddad SL; Fullam S; Pourzal R; Wimmer MA
Foot Ankle Int; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1335-1344. PubMed ID: 30019605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative in vitro wear testing of PEEK and UHMWPE capped metacarpophalangeal prostheses.
Joyce TJ; Rieker C; Unsworth A
Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 16410639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The wear properties of CFR-PEEK-OPTIMA articulating against ceramic assessed on a multidirectional pin-on-plate machine.
Scholes SC; Unsworth A
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Apr; 221(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 17539583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wear studies on the likely performance of CFR-PEEK/CoCrMo for use as artificial joint bearing materials.
Scholes SC; Unsworth A
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2009 Jan; 20(1):163-70. PubMed ID: 18704647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Advances in tribological testing of artificial joint biomaterials using multidirectional pin-on-disk testers.
Baykal D; Siskey RS; Haider H; Saikko V; Ahlroos T; Kurtz SM
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Mar; 31():117-34. PubMed ID: 23831149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK: An alternative material for flexion bushings of rotating hinged knee joints?
Schroeder S; Braun S; Mueller U; Vogel M; Sonntag R; Jaeger S; Kretzer JP
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Jan; 101():103434. PubMed ID: 31542569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
