These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27458542)

  • 1. fMRI exploration of pedagogical benefits of repeated testing: when more is not always better.
    Liu XL; Reder LM
    Brain Behav; 2016 Jul; 6(7):e00476. PubMed ID: 27458542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lesser Neural Pattern Similarity across Repeated Tests Is Associated with Better Long-Term Memory Retention.
    Karlsson Wirebring L; Wiklund-Hörnqvist C; Eriksson J; Andersson M; Jonsson B; Nyberg L
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jul; 35(26):9595-602. PubMed ID: 26134642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncovering the neural mechanisms underlying learning from tests.
    Liu XL; Liang P; Li K; Reder LM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e92025. PubMed ID: 24647122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance feedback enhances test-potentiated encoding.
    Ludowicy P; Paz-Alonso PM; Lachmann T; Czernochowski D
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2023; 17():1100497. PubMed ID: 37153935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural correlates of testing effects in vocabulary learning.
    van den Broek GS; Takashima A; Segers E; Fernández G; Verhoeven L
    Neuroimage; 2013 Sep; 78():94-102. PubMed ID: 23578576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The two processes underlying the testing effect- Evidence from Event-Related Potentials (ERPs).
    Liu XL; Tan DH; Reder LM
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Apr; 112():77-85. PubMed ID: 29474894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional underpinnings of feedback-enhanced test-potentiated encoding.
    Ludowicy P; Czernochowski D; Arnaez-Telleria J; Gurunandan K; Lachmann T; Paz-Alonso PM
    Cereb Cortex; 2023 May; 33(10):6184-6197. PubMed ID: 36585773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. BOLD Activity During Correct-Answer Feedback in Cued Recall Predicts Subsequent Retrieval Performance: An fMRI Investigation Using a Partial Trial Design.
    Gilmore AW; Nelson SM; Naaz F; Shaffer RA; McDermott KB
    Cereb Cortex; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4008-4022. PubMed ID: 29045548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?
    Grimaldi PJ; Karpicke JD
    Mem Cognit; 2012 May; 40(4):505-13. PubMed ID: 22238214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diminished testing benefits in young adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Dudukovic NM; Gottshall JL; Cavanaugh PA; Moody CT
    Memory; 2015; 23(8):1264-76. PubMed ID: 25385006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Activation of human hippocampal formation reflects success in both encoding and cued recall of paired associates.
    Meltzer JA; Constable RT
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(2):384-97. PubMed ID: 15627581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials?
    Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Jan; 38(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 19966244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reversing the testing effect by feedback: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):473-88. PubMed ID: 26857480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing promotes long-term learning via stabilizing activation patterns in a large network of brain areas.
    Keresztes A; Kaiser D; Kovács G; Racsmány M
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Nov; 24(11):3025-35. PubMed ID: 23796945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neuroanatomical correlates of episodic encoding and retrieval in young and elderly subjects.
    Daselaar SM; Veltman DJ; Rombouts SA; Raaijmakers JG; Jonker C
    Brain; 2003 Jan; 126(Pt 1):43-56. PubMed ID: 12477696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Putting action into testing: Enacted retrieval benefits long-term retention more than covert retrieval.
    Kubik V; Jönsson FU; de Jonge M; Arshamian A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Dec; 73(12):2093-2105. PubMed ID: 32686985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic changes in large-scale functional network organization during autobiographical memory retrieval.
    Inman CS; James GA; Vytal K; Hamann S
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Feb; 110():208-224. PubMed ID: 28951163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dopamine Enhances Item Novelty Detection via Hippocampal and Associative Recall via Left Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Mechanisms.
    Clos M; Bunzeck N; Sommer T
    J Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 39(40):7920-7933. PubMed ID: 31405927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transfer-appropriate processing in the testing effect.
    Veltre MT; Cho KW; Neely JH
    Memory; 2015; 23(8):1229-37. PubMed ID: 25345914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reverse inference of memory retrieval processes underlying metacognitive monitoring of learning using multivariate pattern analysis.
    Stiers P; Falbo L; Goulas A; van Gog T; de Bruin A
    Neuroimage; 2016 May; 132():11-23. PubMed ID: 26883066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.