These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2745876)

  • 1. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). I: Effects of click level, rate, and polarity.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2514-25. PubMed ID: 2745876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). III: Additivity of click level and rate with noise level.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Nov; 88(5):2222-34. PubMed ID: 2269738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). II: Effects of broadband noise level and high-pass masker cutoff frequency across click polarity.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2526-36. PubMed ID: 2745877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The brain-stem auditory-evoked response in the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus) to clicks and frequency-modulated sweeps.
    Burkard R; Moss CF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):801-10. PubMed ID: 7930082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked responses to maximum length sequences.
    Burkard R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Apr; 95(4):2126-35. PubMed ID: 8201109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of stimulus repetition rate on ABR threshold, amplitude and latency in neonatal and adult Mongolian gerbils.
    Donaldson GS; Rubel EW
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(6):458-70. PubMed ID: 1701708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interaction of click polarity, stimulus level, and repetition rate on the auditory brainstem response.
    Beattie RC
    Scand Audiol; 1988; 17(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 3187380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Click polarity inversion effects upon the human brainstem auditory evoked potential.
    Kevanishvili Z; Aphonchenko V
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(3):141-7. PubMed ID: 7302521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of stimulus rate on the feline brain-stem auditory evoked response during development. II. Peak amplitudes.
    Burkard R; McGee J; Walsh EJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):991-1002. PubMed ID: 8759952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory-evoked response in the clinically normal dog: early latency components.
    Sims MH; Moore RE
    Am J Vet Res; 1984 Oct; 45(10):2019-27. PubMed ID: 6497099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between auditory brain stem responses evoked by rarefaction and condensation step functions and clicks.
    Tietze G; Pantev C
    Audiology; 1986; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 3954683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of stimulus rate on the feline brain-stem auditory evoked response during development. I. Peak latencies.
    Burkard R; McGee J; Walsh EJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):978-90. PubMed ID: 8759951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of click polarity on the brain-stem auditory evoked response (BAER) revisited.
    Schwartz DM; Morris MD; Spydell JD; Ten Brink C; Grim MA; Schwartz JA
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(6):445-57. PubMed ID: 1701707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immaturity of electrophysiological response of the neonatal auditory brainstem to high repetition rates of click stimulation.
    Jiang ZD; Brosi DM; Wilkinson AR
    Early Hum Dev; 1998 Sep; 52(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 9783815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of N1 of the whole nerve action potential and wave i of the brain-stem auditory evoked response in Mongolian gerbil.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF; Smith RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Apr; 93(4 Pt 1):2069-76. PubMed ID: 8473619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of click polarity on the auditory brainstem responses of older men.
    Rawool VW
    Audiology; 1998; 37(2):100-8. PubMed ID: 9547923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of click phase and rate upon latencies and latency distributions of the normal brain-stem auditory evoked potentials.
    Sand T; Sulg I
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1984 Jun; 57(6):561-70. PubMed ID: 6202487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural masking effects on the human brain-stem auditory-evoked responses to click stimuli.
    Owen GA; Burkard R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Apr; 89(4 Pt 1):1760-7. PubMed ID: 2045584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conventional and cross-correlation brain-stem auditory evoked responses in the white leghorn chick: rate manipulations.
    Burkard R; Jones S; Jones T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Apr; 95(4):2136-44. PubMed ID: 8201110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of stimulus polarity on far-field auditory-evoked electrical responses in the chick.
    Brown-Borg HM; Beck MM; Jones TA
    J Aud Res; 1986 Oct; 26(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 3436924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.