These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2745882)

  • 1. Detection of gaps in sinusoids and pulse trains by patients with cochlear implants.
    Shannon RV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2587-92. PubMed ID: 2745882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory detection and discrimination in deaf cats: psychophysical and neural thresholds for intracochlear electrical signals.
    Vollmer M; Beitel RE; Snyder RL
    J Neurophysiol; 2001 Nov; 86(5):2330-43. PubMed ID: 11698523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The mismatch negativity in cochlear implant users.
    Ponton CW; Don M
    Ear Hear; 1995 Feb; 16(1):131-46. PubMed ID: 7774766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs.
    Dhanasingh A; Jolly C
    Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 356():93-103. PubMed ID: 29102129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. I: Phase duration and stimulus duration.
    Pfingst BE; DeHaan DR; Holloway LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1857-66. PubMed ID: 1960279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of electrical current configuration on stimulus detection.
    Pfingst BE; Miller AL; Morris DJ; Zwolan TA; Spelman FA; Clopton BM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():127-31. PubMed ID: 7668603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
    Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of phase duration on detection of electrical stimulation of the human cochlea.
    Moon AK; Zwolan TA; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 1993 May; 67(1-2):166-78. PubMed ID: 8340268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
    Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating Multipulse Integration as a Neural-Health Correlate in Human Cochlear-Implant Users: Relationship to Psychometric Functions for Detection.
    Zhou N; Dong L
    Trends Hear; 2017 Jan; 21():2331216517690108. PubMed ID: 28150534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal integration in normal hearing, cochlear impairment, and impairment simulated by masking.
    Florentine M; Fastl H; Buus S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):195-203. PubMed ID: 3411048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
    van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gap detection with sinusoids and noise in normal, impaired, and electrically stimulated ears.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Mar; 83(3):1093-101. PubMed ID: 3356814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing.
    van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Macherey O; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 16904278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. I. Intensity dependence of firing rate and response latency.
    Raggio MW; Schreiner CE
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 Nov; 72(5):2334-59. PubMed ID: 7884463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Within- and across-channel gap detection in cochlear implant listeners.
    Grose JH; Buss E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3651-8. PubMed ID: 18247772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gap detection as a measure of electrode interaction in cochlear implants.
    Hanekom JJ; Shannon RV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2372-84. PubMed ID: 10491701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.