These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27459232)
21. Characteristics of Double-J Stent Encrustations and Factors Associated with their Development. Huang J; Wu W; Zhang S; Huang Y; Zeng T; An L; Liang Y; Huang J; Tiselius HG; Zeng G; Wu W Urol J; 2021 Aug; 19(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 34431076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Stent encrustation in feline and human artificial urine: does the low molecular weight composition account for the difference? Shafat M; Rajakumar K; Syme H; Buchholz N; Knight MM Urolithiasis; 2013 Nov; 41(6):481-6. PubMed ID: 24091871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A new hydrophilic biodegradable ureteral stent restrain encrustation both Zhang Y; He J; Chen H; Xiong C J Biomater Appl; 2021 Jan; 35(6):720-731. PubMed ID: 32799701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Particle Accumulation in Ureteral Stents Is Governed by Fluid Dynamics: In Vitro Study Using a "Stent-on-Chip" Model. Mosayyebi A; Yue QY; Somani BK; Zhang X; Manes C; Carugo D J Endourol; 2018 Jul; 32(7):639-646. PubMed ID: 29699424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Chemical and Mineralogical Analysis of Ureteral Stent Encrustation and Associated Risk Factors. Sighinolfi MC; Sighinolfi GP; Galli E; Micali S; Ferrari N; Mofferdin A; Bianchi G Urology; 2015 Oct; 86(4):703-6. PubMed ID: 26297602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A novel ureteral stent material with antibacterial and reducing encrustation properties. Zhao J; Cao Z; Ren L; Chen S; Zhang B; Liu R; Yang K Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Nov; 68():221-228. PubMed ID: 27524016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Encrustations on ureteral stents from patients without urinary tract infection reveal distinct urotypes and a low bacterial load. Buhmann MT; Abt D; Nolte O; Neu TR; Strempel S; Albrich WC; Betschart P; Zumstein V; Neels A; Maniura-Weber K; Ren Q Microbiome; 2019 Apr; 7(1):60. PubMed ID: 30981280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical features determining the fate of a long-term, indwelling, forgotten double J stents. Park K; Jeon SS; Park H; Kim HH Urol Res; 2004 Dec; 32(6):416-20. PubMed ID: 15490143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Antegrade ureteral stents: technical and catheter-related problems with polyethylene and polyurethane. Mitty HA; Dan SJ; Train JS Radiology; 1987 Nov; 165(2):439-43. PubMed ID: 3659366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Encrustation and strength retention properties of the self-expandable, biodegradable, self-reinforced L-lactide-glycolic acid co-polymer 80:20 spiral urethral stent in vitro. Laaksovirta S; Välimaa T; Isotalo T; Törmälä P; Talja M; Tammela TL J Urol; 2003 Aug; 170(2 Pt 1):468-71. PubMed ID: 12853801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Degradation and antibacterial properties of magnesium alloys in artificial urine for potential resorbable ureteral stent applications. Lock JY; Wyatt E; Upadhyayula S; Whall A; Nuñez V; Vullev VI; Liu H J Biomed Mater Res A; 2014 Mar; 102(3):781-92. PubMed ID: 23564415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]