These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27459232)

  • 21. Characteristics of Double-J Stent Encrustations and Factors Associated with their Development.
    Huang J; Wu W; Zhang S; Huang Y; Zeng T; An L; Liang Y; Huang J; Tiselius HG; Zeng G; Wu W
    Urol J; 2021 Aug; 19(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 34431076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stent encrustation in feline and human artificial urine: does the low molecular weight composition account for the difference?
    Shafat M; Rajakumar K; Syme H; Buchholz N; Knight MM
    Urolithiasis; 2013 Nov; 41(6):481-6. PubMed ID: 24091871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A new hydrophilic biodegradable ureteral stent restrain encrustation both
    Zhang Y; He J; Chen H; Xiong C
    J Biomater Appl; 2021 Jan; 35(6):720-731. PubMed ID: 32799701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Particle Accumulation in Ureteral Stents Is Governed by Fluid Dynamics: In Vitro Study Using a "Stent-on-Chip" Model.
    Mosayyebi A; Yue QY; Somani BK; Zhang X; Manes C; Carugo D
    J Endourol; 2018 Jul; 32(7):639-646. PubMed ID: 29699424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Chemical and Mineralogical Analysis of Ureteral Stent Encrustation and Associated Risk Factors.
    Sighinolfi MC; Sighinolfi GP; Galli E; Micali S; Ferrari N; Mofferdin A; Bianchi G
    Urology; 2015 Oct; 86(4):703-6. PubMed ID: 26297602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Severely encrusted polyurethane ureteral stents: management and analysis of potential risk factors.
    Singh I; Gupta NP; Hemal AK; Aron M; Seth A; Dogra PN
    Urology; 2001 Oct; 58(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 11597531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biocompatibility of various indwelling double-J stents.
    Cormio L; Talja M; Koivusalo A; Mäkisalo H; Wolff H; Ruutu M
    J Urol; 1995 Feb; 153(2):494-6. PubMed ID: 7815632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bacteriology of urinary tract infection associated with indwelling J ureteral stents.
    Kehinde EO; Rotimi VO; Al-Hunayan A; Abdul-Halim H; Boland F; Al-Awadi KA
    J Endourol; 2004 Nov; 18(9):891-6. PubMed ID: 15659928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ureteral stent encrustation, incrustation, and coloring: morbidity related to indwelling times.
    Kawahara T; Ito H; Terao H; Yoshida M; Matsuzaki J
    J Endourol; 2012 Feb; 26(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 22007916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Characteristics and usage of different ureteral stent catheters.
    Kohri K; Yamate T; Amasaki N; Ishikawa Y; Umekawa T; Imanishi M; Katayama Y; Kodama M; Iguchi M; Yachiku S
    Urol Int; 1991; 47(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 1771700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hydrophobic forces as a key factor in crystalline biofilm formation on ureteral stents.
    Laube N; Desai C; Bernsmann F
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2016 Oct; 61(5):483-490. PubMed ID: 26943591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bioresorbable ureteral stents from natural origin polymers.
    Barros AA; Rita A; Duarte C; Pires RA; Sampaio-Marques B; Ludovico P; Lima E; Mano JF; Reis RL
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2015 Apr; 103(3):608-17. PubMed ID: 24965000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Forgotten, Encrusted Ureteral Stents: Removal - Multimodal Endourologic Approach.
    Saha PK; Hossain MS; Ghosh KC; Alam MS; Nabi S; Saha BK; Pathan FH
    Mymensingh Med J; 2018 Jan; 27(1):149-158. PubMed ID: 29459607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ureteral stents: coil strength and durometer.
    Hendlin K; Dockendorf K; Horn C; Pshon N; Lund B; Monga M
    Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 16844448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A novel ureteral stent material with antibacterial and reducing encrustation properties.
    Zhao J; Cao Z; Ren L; Chen S; Zhang B; Liu R; Yang K
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Nov; 68():221-228. PubMed ID: 27524016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Encrustations on ureteral stents from patients without urinary tract infection reveal distinct urotypes and a low bacterial load.
    Buhmann MT; Abt D; Nolte O; Neu TR; Strempel S; Albrich WC; Betschart P; Zumstein V; Neels A; Maniura-Weber K; Ren Q
    Microbiome; 2019 Apr; 7(1):60. PubMed ID: 30981280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical features determining the fate of a long-term, indwelling, forgotten double J stents.
    Park K; Jeon SS; Park H; Kim HH
    Urol Res; 2004 Dec; 32(6):416-20. PubMed ID: 15490143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Antegrade ureteral stents: technical and catheter-related problems with polyethylene and polyurethane.
    Mitty HA; Dan SJ; Train JS
    Radiology; 1987 Nov; 165(2):439-43. PubMed ID: 3659366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Encrustation and strength retention properties of the self-expandable, biodegradable, self-reinforced L-lactide-glycolic acid co-polymer 80:20 spiral urethral stent in vitro.
    Laaksovirta S; Välimaa T; Isotalo T; Törmälä P; Talja M; Tammela TL
    J Urol; 2003 Aug; 170(2 Pt 1):468-71. PubMed ID: 12853801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Degradation and antibacterial properties of magnesium alloys in artificial urine for potential resorbable ureteral stent applications.
    Lock JY; Wyatt E; Upadhyayula S; Whall A; Nuñez V; Vullev VI; Liu H
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2014 Mar; 102(3):781-92. PubMed ID: 23564415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.