These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27459498)
1. Tympanoplasty: does dry or wet temporalis fascia graft matter? Singh GB; Kumar D; Aggarwal K; Garg S; Arora R; Kumar S J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Aug; 130(8):700-5. PubMed ID: 27459498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of the nature of the temporalis fascia graft on the outcome of type I underlay tympanoplasty. Jiang Z; Lou Z J Laryngol Otol; 2017 Jun; 131(6):472-475. PubMed ID: 28318475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparitive Study on Impact of Dry (Rigid) Versus Wet (Soft) Graft on the Outcome of Type 1 Tympanoplasty. Shrikrishna BH; Poornima Ramesh M Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Aug; 74(Suppl 1):16-20. PubMed ID: 36032912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of the use of dry (rigid) or wet (soft) temporal fascia graft on tympanoplasty. Alkan S; Baylanĉiĉek S; Sözen E; Baŝak T; Dadaŝ B J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Feb; 38(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 19344622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wet Versus Dry Temporalis Fascia Graft in Type 1 Tympanoplasty: A Randomized Study on Controversy. Bansal M; Ojha T; Sharma P; Chhabra B; Sharma K; Trivedi B Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Dec; 74(Suppl 3):4467-4471. PubMed ID: 36742552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sutureless tympanoplasty using acellular dermis. Raj A; Sayal A; Rathore PK; Meher R Am J Otolaryngol; 2011; 32(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 20392523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vascularisation of myringo-/tympanoplastic grafts in active and inactive chronic mucosal otitis media: a prospective cohort study. Noh H; Lee DH Clin Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 37(5):355-61. PubMed ID: 22950578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Functional results of temporalis fascia versus cartilage tympanoplasty in patients with bilateral chronic otitis media. Onal K; Arslanoglu S; Songu M; Demiray U; Demirpehlivan IA J Laryngol Otol; 2012 Jan; 126(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 22032518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation and comparison of type I tympanoplasty efficacy and histopathological changes to the tympanic membrane in dry and wet ear: a prospective study. Shankar R; Virk RS; Gupta K; Gupta AK; Bal A; Bansal S J Laryngol Otol; 2015 Oct; 129(10):945-9. PubMed ID: 26279256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of simultaneous bilateral same day tympanoplasty type I in chronic suppurative otitis media. Rai AK; Singh GB; Sahu R; Singh S; Arora R Auris Nasus Larynx; 2014 Apr; 41(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 24268329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of a microsliced modified chondroperichondrium shield graft and a temporalis fascia graft in primary type I tympanoplasty: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Bhattacharya SN; Pal S; Saha S; Gure PK; Roy A Ear Nose Throat J; 2016 Jul; 95(7):274-83. PubMed ID: 27434476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Paediatric tympanoplasty: comparative study between patients aged 5-8 years and those aged over 14 years. Singh GB; Arora R; Garg S; Kumar S; Kumar D J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Jul; 130(7):635-9. PubMed ID: 27282473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Success rate of type 1 tympanoplasty: a comparative study. Odat H; Alali M; Kanaan Y; Al-Qudah M J Laryngol Otol; 2021 Apr; 135(4):315-319. PubMed ID: 33691826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dry versus wet temporalis fascia graft in type-I tympanoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Albazee E; Abdelaziz A; Magzoub H; Alanzi A; Aldosari N; Al-Qudah M; Alomar K; Abu-Zaid A Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Mar; 280(3):1005-1015. PubMed ID: 36350366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between clinical and audiological results of tympanoplasty with double layer graft (modified sandwich fascia) technique and single layer graft (underlay fascia and underlay cartilage) technique. Nemade SV; Shinde KJ; Sampate PB Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Jun; 45(3):440-446. PubMed ID: 28855058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cartilage rim augmented fascia tympanoplasty: a more effective composite graft model than temporalis fascia tympanoplasty. Kolethekkat AA; Al Abri R; Al Zaabi K; Al Marhoobi N; Jose S; Pillai S; Mathew J J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Jun; 132(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 29888699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between clinical and audiological results of tympanoplasty with modified sandwich technique and underlay technique. Nemade SV; Shinde KJ; Naik CS; Qadri H Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2018; 84(3):318-323. PubMed ID: 28476655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of circumferential subannular tympanoplasty in anterior and subtotal perforations. Singh GB; Ranjan S; Arora R; Kumar S J Laryngol Otol; 2017 Feb; 131(2):123-127. PubMed ID: 28069080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perichondrium/Cartilage island flap and temporalis muscle fascia in type I tympanoplasty. Onal K; Arslanoglu S; Oncel S; Songu M; Kopar A; Demiray U J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 21777547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]