142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27459630)
21. Volumetric changes in the upper airway after bimaxillary surgery for skeletal class III malocclusions: a case series study using 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography.
Lee Y; Chun YS; Kang N; Kim M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 70(12):2867-75. PubMed ID: 22682739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Is it possible to use cross-sectional and vertical facial measurements to establish the shape of the mandibular arch?
El Haje OA; Pompeo DD; Furtado GC; Rivera LM; Paranhos LR
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):735-9. PubMed ID: 25825099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Anatomic assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for miniscrew insertion in white patients.
Elshebiny T; Palomo JM; Baumgaertel S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):505-511. PubMed ID: 29602342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessing the length of the mandibular ramus and the condylar process: a comparison of OPG, CBCT, CT, MRI, and lateral cephalometric measurements.
Markic G; Müller L; Patcas R; Roos M; Lochbühler N; Peltomäki T; Karlo CA; Ullrich O; Kellenberger CJ
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 25154725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Three-dimensional anatomic analysis of the lingula and mandibular foramen: a cone beam computed tomography study.
Findik Y; Yildirim D; Baykul T
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 25(2):607-10. PubMed ID: 24448541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Observation of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computerized tomography.
Naitoh M; Hiraiwa Y; Aimiya H; Ariji E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):155-9. PubMed ID: 19344041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. 3D mandibular positioning after rapid maxillary expansion in Class II malocclusion.
Baratieri C; Alves M; Sant'anna EF; Nojima Mda C; Nojima LI
Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(5):428-34. PubMed ID: 22011901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of mandibular morphology in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism.
You KH; Lee KJ; Lee SH; Baik HS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):540.e1-8; discussion 540-1. PubMed ID: 21055584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of masseter muscle morphology in different types of malocclusions using cone beam computed tomography.
Becht MP; Mah J; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 24456631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Lower face cephalometry based on quadrilateral analysis with cone-beam computed tomography: a clinical pilot study.
Dobai A; Vizkelety T; Markella Z; Rosta A; Kucsera Á; Barabás J
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 21(2):207-218. PubMed ID: 28337564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images.
Ludlow JB; Laster WS; See M; Bailey LJ; Hershey HG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Apr; 103(4):534-42. PubMed ID: 17395068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position.
Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Sanderink G
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 19106265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of condylar head surface changes on mandibular position in patients with temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis.
Seo YJ; Park SB; Kim YI; Ok SM; Kim SS; Son WS
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1380-3. PubMed ID: 26209414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mandibular ramus height and condyle distance asymmetries in individuals with different facial growth patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
Lemes CR; Tozzi CF; Gribel S; Gribel BF; Venezian GC; do Carmo Menezes C; Custodio W
Surg Radiol Anat; 2021 Feb; 43(2):267-274. PubMed ID: 32965519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reliability and validity of mandibular posterior vertical asymmetry index in panoramic radiography compared with cone-beam computed tomography.
Lim YS; Chung DH; Lee JW; Lee SM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):558-567. PubMed ID: 29602348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.
Nur RB; Çakan DG; Arun T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 26827979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Volumetric characteristics of prognathic mandible revealed by skeletal unit analysis.
Mun SH; Park M; Lee J; Lim HJ; Kim BC
Ann Anat; 2019 Nov; 226():3-9. PubMed ID: 31336151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Can cone-beam computed tomography superimposition help orthodontists better understand relapse in surgical patients?
Porciúncula GM; Koerich L; Eidson L; Gandini Junior LG; Gonçalves JR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):641-54. PubMed ID: 25439215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Three-dimensional evaluation of labial alveolar bone overlying the maxillary and mandibular incisors in different skeletal classifications of malocclusion.
Raber A; Kula K; Ghoneima A
Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):287-295. PubMed ID: 31015017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
