These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27460321)

  • 1. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part I: digital versus conventional unilateral impressions.
    Benic GI; Mühlemann S; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Nov; 116(5):777-782. PubMed ID: 27460321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit.
    Zeltner M; Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Özcan M; Hämmerle CH; Benic GI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 27677220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part I: Time efficiency of complete-arch digital scans versus conventional impressions.
    Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CHF; Benic GI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 30017152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Limited evidence suggests complete arch digital scans are less time efficient than conventional impression.
    Sedky A; Abd-Elwahab Radi I
    Evid Based Dent; 2020 Dec; 21(4):138-139. PubMed ID: 33339976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures.
    Sailer I; Benic GI; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CHF; Mühlemann S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 28024819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part III: Marginal and internal fit.
    Benic GI; Sailer I; Zeltner M; Gütermann JN; Özcan M; Mühlemann S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):426-431. PubMed ID: 30396708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow.
    Seelbach P; Brueckel C; Wöstmann B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Sep; 17(7):1759-64. PubMed ID: 23086333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical quality and efficiency of monolithic glass ceramic crowns in the posterior area: digital compared with conventional workflows.
    Mühlemann S; Benic GI; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CHF; Sailer I
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(3):215-223. PubMed ID: 30264050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners.
    Abdel-Azim T; Rogers K; Elathamna E; Zandinejad A; Metz M; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The fit of crowns produced using digital impression systems.
    Vennerstrom M; Fakhary M; Von Steyern PV
    Swed Dent J; 2014; 38(3):101-10. PubMed ID: 25796804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions.
    Ender A; Zimmermann M; Attin T; Mehl A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Sep; 20(7):1495-504. PubMed ID: 26547869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry IL; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 25488521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions.
    Ender A; Attin T; Mehl A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Mar; 115(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 26548890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical marginal fit of zirconia crowns and patients' preferences for impression techniques using intraoral digital scanner versus polyvinyl siloxane material.
    Sakornwimon N; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):386-391. PubMed ID: 28222872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique.
    Neves FD; Prado CJ; Prudente MS; Carneiro TA; Zancopé K; Davi LR; Mendonça G; Cooper LF; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1134-40. PubMed ID: 24969409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions.
    Zarauz C; Valverde A; Martinez-Rus F; Hassan B; Pradies G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 May; 20(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 26362778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions--an in-vitro study.
    Ender A; Mehl A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2011; 14(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 21657122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for single-unit premolar implant crowns: Operating time and patient preference.
    Schepke U; Meijer HJ; Kerdijk W; Cune MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):403-6.e1. PubMed ID: 26047800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.