These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27460337)
1. Comparison of a modified phenol/chloroform and commercial-kit methods for extracting DNA from horse fecal material. Janabi AHD; Kerkhof LJ; McGuinness LR; Biddle AS; McKeever KH J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Oct; 129():14-19. PubMed ID: 27460337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation. Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Methods for the Extraction of Microbial DNA From Vaginal Swabs Used for Microbiome Studies. Mattei V; Murugesan S; Al Hashmi M; Mathew R; James N; Singh P; Kumar M; Lakshmanan AP; Terranegra A; Al Khodor S; Tomei S Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2019; 9():197. PubMed ID: 31245304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform. Castelino M; Eyre S; Moat J; Fox G; Martin P; Ho P; Upton M; Barton A BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28109256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Biases on community structure during DNA extraction of shrimp intestinal microbiota revealed by high-throughput sequencing]. Wen C; He Y; Xue M; Liang H; Dong J Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2016 Jan; 56(1):130-42. PubMed ID: 27305787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of the fecal bacteria communities of forage-fed horses by pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA V4 gene amplicons. Shepherd ML; Swecker WS; Jensen RV; Ponder MA FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2012 Jan; 326(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 22092776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of fecal bacterial diversity among healthy piglets during the weaning transition. Alain B Pajarillo E; Chae JP; Balolong MP; Bum Kim H; Kang DK J Gen Appl Microbiol; 2014; 60(4):140-6. PubMed ID: 25273987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Analysis of the dynamic changes in gut microbiota in patients with extremely severe burns by 16S ribosomal RNA high-throughput sequencing technology]. Pan YY; Fan YF; Li JL; Cui SY; Huang N; Jin GY; Chen C; Zhang C Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2020 Dec; 36(12):1159-1166. PubMed ID: 33379852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. High-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA Gene Reveals Substantial Bacterial Diversity on the Municipal Dumpsite. Mwaikono KS; Maina S; Sebastian A; Schilling M; Kapur V; Gwakisa P BMC Microbiol; 2016 Jul; 16(1):145. PubMed ID: 27400733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of DNA extraction methodology on gut microbiota research applications. Gerasimidis K; Bertz M; Quince C; Brunner K; Bruce A; Combet E; Calus S; Loman N; Ijaz UZ BMC Res Notes; 2016 Jul; 9():365. PubMed ID: 27456340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combined bacterial and fungal targeted amplicon sequencing of respiratory samples: Does the DNA extraction method matter? Angebault C; Payen M; Woerther PL; Rodriguez C; Botterel F PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0232215. PubMed ID: 32343737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intense Exercise and Aerobic Conditioning Associated with Chromium or L-Carnitine Supplementation Modified the Fecal Microbiota of Fillies. Almeida ML; Feringer WH; Carvalho JR; Rodrigues IM; Jordão LR; Fonseca MG; Carneiro de Rezende AS; de Queiroz Neto A; Weese JS; Costa MC; Lemos EG; Ferraz GC PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0167108. PubMed ID: 27935992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Freezing fecal samples prior to DNA extraction affects the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio determined by downstream quantitative PCR analysis. Bahl MI; Bergström A; Licht TR FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2012 Apr; 329(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 22325006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid regrowth and detection of microbial contaminants in equine fecal microbiome samples. Beckers KF; Schulz CJ; Childers GW PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187044. PubMed ID: 29091944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the fecal microbiota of dholes high-throughput Illumina sequencing of the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Wu X; Zhang H; Chen J; Shang S; Wei Q; Yan J; Tu X Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2016 Apr; 100(8):3577-86. PubMed ID: 26728019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of sequencing platforms and bioinformatics pipelines for compositional analysis of the gut microbiome. Allali I; Arnold JW; Roach J; Cadenas MB; Butz N; Hassan HM; Koci M; Ballou A; Mendoza M; Ali R; Azcarate-Peril MA BMC Microbiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):194. PubMed ID: 28903732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of direct boiling method with commercial kits for extracting fecal microbiome DNA by Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA tags. Peng X; Yu KQ; Deng GH; Jiang YX; Wang Y; Zhang GX; Zhou HW J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Dec; 95(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 23899773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities. Vesty A; Biswas K; Taylor MW; Gear K; Douglas RG PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169877. PubMed ID: 28099455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of a new magnetic bead-based DNA extraction method from fecal samples for downstream next-generation 16S rRNA gene sequencing. McGaughey KD; Yilmaz-Swenson T; Elsayed NM; Cruz DA; Rodriguez RR; Kritzer MD; Peterchev AV; Gray M; Lewis SR; Roach J; Wetsel WC; Williamson DE PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202858. PubMed ID: 30138447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]