175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27460724)
1. Comparison of the VISX wavescan and OPD-scan III with the subjective refraction.
Zhu R; Long KL; Wu XM; Li QD
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2016 Jul; 20(14):2988-92. PubMed ID: 27460724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the VISX wavescan and NIDEK OPD-scan aberrometers.
Kim DS; Narváez J; Krassin J; Bahjri K
J Refract Surg; 2009 May; 25(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 19507795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the auto-refraction function of the Nidek OPD-Scan III.
McGinnigle S; Naroo SA; Eperjesi F
Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Mar; 97(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 24024877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Objective and subjective preoperative refraction techniques for wavefront-optimized and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
Perez-Straziota CE; Randleman JB; Stulting RD
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):256-9. PubMed ID: 19185239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of refractive error measurements of the Wavescan Wavefront system and the Tracey Wavefront aberrometer.
Wang L; Wang N; Koch DD
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 May; 29(5):970-9. PubMed ID: 12781285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Incidence of refractive errors with corrective aids subsequent selection].
Benes P; Synek S; Petrová S; Sokolová SJ; Forýtková L; Holoubková Z
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 Feb; 68(1):11-4, 16. PubMed ID: 22679692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of refractive assessment by wavefront aberrometry, autorefraction, and subjective refraction.
Bennett JR; Stalboerger GM; Hodge DO; Schornack MM
J Optom; 2015; 8(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 25498534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy, repeatability, and clinical application of spherocylindrical automated refraction using time-based wavefront aberrometry measurements.
Nissman SA; Tractenberg RE; Saba CM; Douglas JC; Lustbader JM
Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):577.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16527354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study.
Stoor K; Karvonen E; Liinamaa J; Saarela V
Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 96(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 29193822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction.
Lebow KA; Campbell CE
Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1191-8. PubMed ID: 25198541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between wavefront-derived refraction and auto-refraction.
Yakar K; Kan E; Duran M
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2023 Dec; 44():103712. PubMed ID: 37459941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Relationships between refractive parameters: sphere, cylinder and axis].
Touzeau O; Gaujoux T; Bullet J; Allouch C; Borderie V; Laroche L
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2012 Oct; 35(8):587-98. PubMed ID: 22673049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
María Revert A; Conversa MA; Albarrán Diego C; Micó V
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of Viewing Conditions and Vision Anomalies on Accuracy and Dynamics of Noncycloplegic Autorefraction.
Kiermasz J; Sobol M; Pniewski J
Optom Vis Sci; 2022 Dec; 99(12):844-852. PubMed ID: 36594753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of higher order aberrations measured by NIDEK OPD-Scan dynamic skiascopy and Zeiss WASCA Hartmann-Shack aberrometers.
Cerviño A; Hosking SL; Montés-Micó R
J Refract Surg; 2008 Oct; 24(8):790-6. PubMed ID: 18856232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modifications made to the refractive result when prescribing spectacles.
Hrynchak PK; Mittelstaedt AM; Harris J; Machan CM; Irving EL
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Feb; 89(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 22127152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Change in over-refraction after scleral lens settling on average corneas.
Bray C; Britton S; Yeung D; Haines L; Sorbara L
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):467-472. PubMed ID: 28497619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing the Netra smartphone refractor to subjective refraction.
Tousignant B; Garceau MC; Bouffard-Saint-Pierre N; Bellemare MM; Hanssens JM
Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Jul; 103(4):501-506. PubMed ID: 31773810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
