These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27460724)

  • 21. Performance of a new binocular wavefront aberrometer based on a self-imaging diffractive sensor.
    Warden L; Liu Y; Binder PS; Dreher AW; Sverdrup L
    J Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 24(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 18297944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Comparison Between Refraction From an Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator and Clinical Refractions.
    Tabernero J; Otero C; Pardhan S
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Jun; 9(7):23. PubMed ID: 32832229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Repeatability and reproducibility of manifest refraction.
    Taneri S; Arba-Mosquera S; Rost A; Kießler S; Dick HB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Dec; 46(12):1659-1666. PubMed ID: 33259390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability of refraction--a literature review.
    Goss DA; Grosvenor T
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):619-30. PubMed ID: 8942135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. AcuTarget measurements: repeatability and comparison to OPD-Scan III.
    Guilbert E; Saad A; Gatinel D
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Mar; 30(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 24763722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical evaluation of the Allergan Humphrey 500 autorefractor and the Nidek AR-1000 autorefractor.
    Kinge B; Midelfart A; Jacobsen G
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1996 Jan; 80(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8664229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical evaluation of an automated subjective refraction method implemented in a computer-controlled motorized phoropter.
    Otero C; Aldaba M; Pujol J
    J Optom; 2019; 12(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 30389250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Higher order aberrations using the NIDEK OPD-Scan and AMO WaveScan.
    McAlinden C; Moore JE
    J Refract Surg; 2010 Aug; 26(8):605-8. PubMed ID: 20438022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of wavefront aberrations in rabbit and human eyes.
    Chen L; Huang LC; Gray B; Chernyak DA
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 25069625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Retinoscopy/autorefraction: which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
    Jorge J; Queirós A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15630406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Usefulness of refractive measurement of wavefront autorefraction in patients with difficult retinoscopy.
    Kinori M; Gomi CF; Ondeck CL; Schanzlin DJ; Robbins SL; Granet DB
    J AAPOS; 2016 Dec; 20(6):493-495.e1. PubMed ID: 27815189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy, speed and repeatability of the voice assisted subjective refractor (VASR).
    Kabat AG; Lievens CW; Newman CM; Weber J
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2019; 13():1807-1813. PubMed ID: 31571819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Precision of NIDEK OPD-scan measurements.
    Holzer MP; Goebels S; Auffarth GU
    J Refract Surg; 2006 Nov; 22(9 Suppl):S1021-3. PubMed ID: 17444086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Agreement of subjective and objective refraction measurements following INTRACOR femtosecond laser treatment].
    Fitting A; Ehmer A; Rabsilber TM; Auffarth GU; Holzer MP
    Ophthalmologe; 2011 Sep; 108(9):852-8. PubMed ID: 21720876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison between subjective refraction and aberrometry-derived refraction in keratoconus patients and control subjects.
    Jinabhai A; O'Donnell C; Radhakrishnan H
    Curr Eye Res; 2010 Aug; 35(8):703-14. PubMed ID: 20673047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of Measurements and Clinical Outcomes After Wavefront-Guided LASEK Between iDesign and WaveScan.
    Jung JW; Chung BH; Han SH; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim TI
    J Refract Surg; 2015 Jun; 31(6):398-405. PubMed ID: 26046707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of clinical refractive data obtained by three examiners.
    Perrigin J; Perrigin D; Grosvenor T
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1982 Jun; 59(6):515-9. PubMed ID: 7102813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Repeatability and validity of the PowerRefractor and the Nidek AR600-A in an adult population with healthy eyes.
    Allen PM; Radhakrishnan H; O'Leary DJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 80(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 12637836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Agreement Between Autorefraction and Subjective Refraction in Keraring-Implanted Keratoconic Eyes.
    Al-Tuwairqi WS; Ogbuehi KC; Razzouk H; Alanazi MA; Osuagwu UL
    Eye Contact Lens; 2017 Mar; 43(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 26825280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hand-Held Nidek versus Table-Mounted Huvitz Autorefractors and Their Agreement with Subjective Refraction in Adults.
    Sayed KM; Alsmman AH; Mostafa EM
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2021; 15():1391-1401. PubMed ID: 33833497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.