These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27460724)

  • 41. Evaluation of a clinical aberrometer for lower-order accuracy and repeatability, higher-order repeatability, and instrument myopia.
    Salmon TO; van de Pol C
    Optometry; 2005 Aug; 76(8):461-72. PubMed ID: 16150413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of internal refraction with the optical path difference scan.
    Muftuoglu O; Erdem U
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Jan; 115(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 18166405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effect of Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy on ocular wave front aberrations.
    Levy J; Lifshitz T; Klemperer I; Knyazer B; Ashkenazy Z; Kratz A; Belfair N
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2009 Oct; 44(5):529-33. PubMed ID: 19789587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Population-based assessment of sensitivity and specificity of a pinhole for detection of significant refractive errors in the community.
    Marmamula S; Keeffe JE; Narsaiah S; Khanna RC; Rao GN
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):523-7. PubMed ID: 24909916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Assessment of toric intraocular lens alignment by a refractive power/corneal analyzer system and slitlamp observation.
    Carey PJ; Leccisotti A; McGilligan VE; Goodall EA; Moore CB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 36(2):222-9. PubMed ID: 20152601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Repeatability of internal aberrometry with a new simultaneous capture aberrometer/corneal topographer.
    Gifford P; Swarbrick HA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jun; 89(6):929-38. PubMed ID: 22543999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of the visual outcomes and OPD-scan results of AMO Tecnis toric and Alcon Acrysof IQ toric intraocular lenses.
    Ferreira TB; Almeida A
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Aug; 28(8):551-5. PubMed ID: 22785061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of laser ray-tracing and skiascopic ocular wavefront-sensing devices.
    Bartsch DU; Bessho K; Gomez L; Freeman WR
    Eye (Lond); 2008 Nov; 22(11):1384-90. PubMed ID: 17571088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Diagnostic accuracy and variability of autorefraction by the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer and the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001 in relation to subjective refraction.
    Cleary G; Spalton DJ; Patel PM; Lin PF; Marshall J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Mar; 29(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 19236587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of refractive error measurements by three different models of autorefractors and subjective refraction in young adults.
    Wosik J; Patrzykont M; Pniewski J
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2019 Apr; 36(4):B1-B6. PubMed ID: 31044948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Clinical evaluation of refractive techniques.
    McKendrick AM; Brennan NA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Dec; 66(12):758-65. PubMed ID: 8557954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of higher-order aberrations after LASEK with a 6.0 mm ablation zone and a 6.5 mm ablation zone with blend zone.
    Seo KY; Lee JB; Kang JJ; Lee ES; Kim EK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Mar; 30(3):653-7. PubMed ID: 15050263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The AO SR IIItm Subjective Refraction System: comparison with Phoropter measures.
    Woo GC; Woodruff ME
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1978 Aug; 55(8):591-6. PubMed ID: 742650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. OPD-Scan III: a repeatability and inter-device agreement study of a multifunctional device in emmetropia, ametropia, and keratoconus.
    Asgari S; Hashemi H; Jafarzadehpur E; Mohamadi A; Rezvan F; Fotouhi A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 36(5):697-705. PubMed ID: 26854319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction.
    Rosenfield M; Chiu NN
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 72(8):577-9. PubMed ID: 8539026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Subjective refraction of the peripheral field using contrast detection acuity.
    Wang YZ; Thibos LN; Lopez N; Salmon T; Bradley A
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):584-9. PubMed ID: 8942130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Predicting time to refractive stability after discontinuation of rigid contact lens wear before refractive surgery.
    Tsai PS; Dowidar A; Naseri A; McLeod SD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2290-4. PubMed ID: 15519077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Repeatability and agreement of ARK-30 autorefraction after cataract surgery.
    de Juan V; Herreras JM; Martin R; Morejon A; Perez I; Rio-Cristobal A; Rodriguez G
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 40(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 21745261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of ocular aberrations measured by a Fourier-based Hartmann-Shack and Zernike-based Tscherning aberrometer before and after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Sáles CS; Manche EE
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1820-5. PubMed ID: 26603389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Precision in automated refraction.
    Salvesen S; Køhler M
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1991 Jun; 69(3):338-41. PubMed ID: 1927316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.