206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27461749)
21. The role of noticing in prospective memory forgetting.
Kliegel M; Guynn MJ; Zimmer H
Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jun; 64(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 17113673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accumulating evidence about what prospective memory costs actually reveal.
Strickland L; Heathcote A; Remington RW; Loft S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1616-1629. PubMed ID: 28383957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Response dynamics in prospective memory.
Abney DH; McBride DM; Conte AM; Vinson DW
Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):1020-8. PubMed ID: 25407659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Performance predictions affect attentional processes of event-based prospective memory.
Rummel J; Kuhlmann BG; Touron DR
Conscious Cogn; 2013 Sep; 22(3):729-41. PubMed ID: 23703025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Implementation-intention encoding in a prospective memory task enhances spontaneous retrieval of intentions.
Rummel J; Einstein GO; Rampey H
Memory; 2012; 20(8):803-17. PubMed ID: 22897132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The valence of event-based prospective memory cues or the context in which they occur affects their detection.
Clark-Foos A; Brewer GA; Marsh RL; Meeks JT; Cook GI
Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 19353934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of characteristics of target cues on task interference from prospective memory.
Chen Y; Huang X; Jackson T; Yang H
Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 18978643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of cue focality on the neural mechanisms of prospective memory: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.
Cona G; Bisiacchi PS; Sartori G; Scarpazza C
Sci Rep; 2016 May; 6():25983. PubMed ID: 27185531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Effect of Stereotype Threat on Age Differences in Prospective Memory Performance: Differential Effects on Focal Versus Nonfocal Tasks.
Zuber S; Ihle A; Blum A; Desrichard O; Kliegel M
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2019 Apr; 74(4):625-632. PubMed ID: 28958021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An individual difference perspective on focal versus nonfocal prospective memory.
Zuber S; Kliegel M; Ihle A
Mem Cognit; 2016 Nov; 44(8):1192-1203. PubMed ID: 27351880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Is it relevant? Influence of trial manipulations of prospective memory context on task interference.
Lourenço JS; Maylor EA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):687-702. PubMed ID: 23971415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Is retrieval mediated after repeated testing?
Kole JA; Healy AF
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):462-72. PubMed ID: 22686841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Context cue focality influences strategic prospective memory monitoring.
Hunter Ball B; Bugg JM
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1405-1415. PubMed ID: 29435962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An implementation intention strategy can improve prospective memory in older adults with very mild Alzheimer's disease.
Lee JH; Shelton JT; Scullin MK; McDaniel MA
Br J Clin Psychol; 2016 Jun; 55(2):154-66. PubMed ID: 25994043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Allowing brief delays in responding improves event-based prospective memory for young adults living with HIV disease.
Loft S; Doyle KL; Naar-King S; Outlaw AY; Nichols SL; Weber E; Casaletto KB; Woods SP
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(7):761-72. PubMed ID: 25116075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of semantic context on prospective memory performance.
Thomas BJ; McBride DM
Memory; 2016; 24(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 25647351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparing time-based and event-based prospective memory over short delays.
Conte AM; McBride DM
Memory; 2018 Aug; 26(7):936-945. PubMed ID: 29380656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Remembering the past and imagining the future: Selective effects of an episodic specificity induction on detail generation.
Madore KP; Schacter DL
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(2):285-98. PubMed ID: 25529786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The testing effect under divided attention.
Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1934-1947. PubMed ID: 28504527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Let it go: the flexible engagement and disengagement of monitoring processes in a non-focal prospective memory task.
Cohen AL; Gordon A; Jaudas A; Hefer C; Dreisbach G
Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):366-377. PubMed ID: 26820461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
