These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27463851)

  • 1. A Statistical Survey on the Binding Constants of Covalently Bound Protein-Ligand Complexes.
    Li X; Liu Z; Li Y; Li J; Li J; Wang R
    Mol Inform; 2010 Jan; 29(1-2):87-96. PubMed ID: 27463851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An extensive test of 14 scoring functions using the PDBbind refined set of 800 protein-ligand complexes.
    Wang R; Lu Y; Fang X; Wang S
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):2114-25. PubMed ID: 15554682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 1. Compilation of the test set.
    Li Y; Liu Z; Li J; Han L; Liu J; Zhao Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1700-16. PubMed ID: 24716849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel serine protease inhibition motif involving a multi-centered short hydrogen bonding network at the active site.
    Katz BA; Elrod K; Luong C; Rice MJ; Mackman RL; Sprengeler PA; Spencer J; Hataye J; Janc J; Link J; Litvak J; Rai R; Rice K; Sideris S; Verner E; Young W
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 307(5):1451-86. PubMed ID: 11292354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.
    Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the performance of four molecular docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes.
    Li X; Li Y; Cheng T; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Aug; 31(11):2109-25. PubMed ID: 20127741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Noncovalent interaction energies in covalent complexes: TEM-1 beta-lactamase and beta-lactams.
    Wang X; Minasov G; Shoichet BK
    Proteins; 2002 Apr; 47(1):86-96. PubMed ID: 11870868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The PDBbind database: methodologies and updates.
    Wang R; Fang X; Lu Y; Yang CY; Wang S
    J Med Chem; 2005 Jun; 48(12):4111-9. PubMed ID: 15943484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of dissociation constants of inhibitors binding to Src SH2 domain protein by non-covalent electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.
    Bligh SW; Haley T; Lowe PN
    J Mol Recognit; 2003; 16(3):139-48. PubMed ID: 12833569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical Analysis and Prediction of Covalent Ligand Targeted Cysteine Residues.
    Zhang W; Pei J; Lai L
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Jun; 57(6):1453-1460. PubMed ID: 28510428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SuperStar: improved knowledge-based interaction fields for protein binding sites.
    Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Watson P; Gillet V; Willett P
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Mar; 307(3):841-59. PubMed ID: 11273705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 2. Evaluation methods and general results.
    Li Y; Han L; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1717-36. PubMed ID: 24708446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Docking covalent inhibitors: a parameter free approach to pose prediction and scoring.
    Zhu K; Borrelli KW; Greenwood JR; Day T; Abel R; Farid RS; Harder E
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):1932-40. PubMed ID: 24916536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization of Zn(q+)-imidazole (q = 0, 1, 2) organometallic complexes: DFT methods vs. standard and explicitly correlated post-Hartree-Fock methods.
    Boussouf K; Boulmene R; Prakash M; Komiha N; Taleb M; Mogren Al-Mogren M; Hochlaf M
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2015 Jun; 17(22):14417-26. PubMed ID: 25920409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calculations on noncovalent interactions and databases of benchmark interaction energies.
    Hobza P
    Acc Chem Res; 2012 Apr; 45(4):663-72. PubMed ID: 22225511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cross-Mapping of Protein - Ligand Binding Data Between ChEMBL and PDBbind.
    Liu Z; Li J; Liu J; Liu Y; Nie W; Han L; Li Y; Wang R
    Mol Inform; 2015 Aug; 34(8):568-76. PubMed ID: 27490502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uterine estrogen receptor interaction with estrogen-responsive DNA sequences in vitro: effects of ligand binding on receptor-DNA complexes.
    Curtis SW; Korach KS
    Mol Endocrinol; 1990 Feb; 4(2):276-86. PubMed ID: 2330006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hierarchical PLS modeling for predicting the binding of a comprehensive set of structurally diverse protein-ligand complexes.
    Lindström A; Pettersson F; Almqvist F; Berglund A; Kihlberg J; Linusson A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(3):1154-67. PubMed ID: 16711735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cleavage of an RNA model catalyzed by dinuclear Zn(II) complexes containing rate-accelerating pendants. Comparison of the catalytic benefits of H-bonding and hydrophobic substituents.
    Mohamed MF; Brown RS
    J Org Chem; 2010 Dec; 75(24):8471-7. PubMed ID: 21087029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enzymatic and structural characterization of non-peptide ligand-cyclophilin complexes.
    Kontopidis G; Taylor P; Walkinshaw MD
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2004 Mar; 60(Pt 3):479-85. PubMed ID: 14993672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.