These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27464267)

  • 1. Virtual Activity Profiling of Bioactive Molecules by 1D Fingerprinting.
    Sebastian A; Bender A; Ramakrishnan V
    Mol Inform; 2010 Nov; 29(11):773-9. PubMed ID: 27464267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combining pharmacophore fingerprints and PLS-discriminant analysis for virtual screening and SAR elucidation.
    Askjaer S; Langgård M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar; 48(3):476-88. PubMed ID: 18281962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rendering conventional molecular fingerprints for virtual screening independent of molecular complexity and size effects.
    Nisius B; Bajorath J
    ChemMedChem; 2010 Jun; 5(6):859-68. PubMed ID: 20425878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fighting high molecular weight in bioactive molecules with sub-pharmacophore-based virtual screening.
    von Korff M; Freyss J; Sander T; Boss C; Ciana CL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Feb; 52(2):380-90. PubMed ID: 22251316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PhAST: pharmacophore alignment search tool.
    Hähnke V; Hofmann B; Grgat T; Proschak E; Steinhilber D; Schneider G
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Apr; 30(5):761-71. PubMed ID: 18727161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parameterization and conformational sampling effects in pharmacophore multiplet searching.
    Fox PC; Wolohan PR; Abrahamian E; Clark RD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2326-34. PubMed ID: 19053520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SHAFTS: a hybrid approach for 3D molecular similarity calculation. 1. Method and assessment of virtual screening.
    Liu X; Jiang H; Li H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Sep; 51(9):2372-85. PubMed ID: 21819157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pharmacophore alignment search tool: influence of scoring systems on text-based similarity searching.
    Hähnke V; Schneider G
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Jun; 32(8):1635-47. PubMed ID: 21328403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fuzzy pharmacophore models from molecular alignments for correlation-vector-based virtual screening.
    Renner S; Schneider G
    J Med Chem; 2004 Sep; 47(19):4653-64. PubMed ID: 15341481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scaffold hopping through virtual screening using 2D and 3D similarity descriptors: ranking, voting, and consensus scoring.
    Zhang Q; Muegge I
    J Med Chem; 2006 Mar; 49(5):1536-48. PubMed ID: 16509572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mini-fingerprints for virtual screening: design principles and generation of novel prototypes based on information theory.
    Xue L; Godden JW; Bajorath J
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2003 Feb; 14(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 12688414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parallel screening: a novel concept in pharmacophore modeling and virtual screening.
    Steindl TM; Schuster D; Laggner C; Langer T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(5):2146-57. PubMed ID: 16995745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of fingerprint-based methods for virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures.
    Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(3):1177-85. PubMed ID: 15154787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of conformational flexibility on three-dimensional similarity searching using correlation vectors.
    Renner S; Schwab CH; Gasteiger J; Schneider G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2324-32. PubMed ID: 17125176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Searching for pharmacophoric patterns in databases of three-dimensional chemical structures.
    Willett P
    J Mol Recognit; 1995; 8(5):290-303. PubMed ID: 8619950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How similar are similarity searching methods? A principal component analysis of molecular descriptor space.
    Bender A; Jenkins JL; Scheiber J; Sukuru SC; Glick M; Davies JW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jan; 49(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 19123924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multifingerprint based similarity searches for targeted class compound selection.
    Kogej T; Engkvist O; Blomberg N; Muresan S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(3):1201-13. PubMed ID: 16711740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Bayes affinity fingerprints" improve retrieval rates in virtual screening and define orthogonal bioactivity space: when are multitarget drugs a feasible concept?
    Bender A; Jenkins JL; Glick M; Deng Z; Nettles JH; Davies JW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2445-56. PubMed ID: 17125186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pharmacophoric fingerprint method (TOPP) for 3D-QSAR modeling: application to CYP2D6 metabolic stability.
    Sciabola S; Morao I; de Groot MJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 17238251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Support-vector-machine-based ranking significantly improves the effectiveness of similarity searching using 2D fingerprints and multiple reference compounds.
    Geppert H; Horváth T; Gärtner T; Wrobel S; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Apr; 48(4):742-6. PubMed ID: 18318473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.