These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Parameterization and conformational sampling effects in pharmacophore multiplet searching. Fox PC; Wolohan PR; Abrahamian E; Clark RD J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2326-34. PubMed ID: 19053520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SHAFTS: a hybrid approach for 3D molecular similarity calculation. 1. Method and assessment of virtual screening. Liu X; Jiang H; Li H J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Sep; 51(9):2372-85. PubMed ID: 21819157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pharmacophore alignment search tool: influence of scoring systems on text-based similarity searching. Hähnke V; Schneider G J Comput Chem; 2011 Jun; 32(8):1635-47. PubMed ID: 21328403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fuzzy pharmacophore models from molecular alignments for correlation-vector-based virtual screening. Renner S; Schneider G J Med Chem; 2004 Sep; 47(19):4653-64. PubMed ID: 15341481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Scaffold hopping through virtual screening using 2D and 3D similarity descriptors: ranking, voting, and consensus scoring. Zhang Q; Muegge I J Med Chem; 2006 Mar; 49(5):1536-48. PubMed ID: 16509572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mini-fingerprints for virtual screening: design principles and generation of novel prototypes based on information theory. Xue L; Godden JW; Bajorath J SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2003 Feb; 14(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 12688414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Parallel screening: a novel concept in pharmacophore modeling and virtual screening. Steindl TM; Schuster D; Laggner C; Langer T J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(5):2146-57. PubMed ID: 16995745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of conformational flexibility on three-dimensional similarity searching using correlation vectors. Renner S; Schwab CH; Gasteiger J; Schneider G J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2324-32. PubMed ID: 17125176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Searching for pharmacophoric patterns in databases of three-dimensional chemical structures. Willett P J Mol Recognit; 1995; 8(5):290-303. PubMed ID: 8619950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How similar are similarity searching methods? A principal component analysis of molecular descriptor space. Bender A; Jenkins JL; Scheiber J; Sukuru SC; Glick M; Davies JW J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jan; 49(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 19123924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multifingerprint based similarity searches for targeted class compound selection. Kogej T; Engkvist O; Blomberg N; Muresan S J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(3):1201-13. PubMed ID: 16711740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. "Bayes affinity fingerprints" improve retrieval rates in virtual screening and define orthogonal bioactivity space: when are multitarget drugs a feasible concept? Bender A; Jenkins JL; Glick M; Deng Z; Nettles JH; Davies JW J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2445-56. PubMed ID: 17125186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pharmacophoric fingerprint method (TOPP) for 3D-QSAR modeling: application to CYP2D6 metabolic stability. Sciabola S; Morao I; de Groot MJ J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 17238251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Support-vector-machine-based ranking significantly improves the effectiveness of similarity searching using 2D fingerprints and multiple reference compounds. Geppert H; Horváth T; Gärtner T; Wrobel S; Bajorath J J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Apr; 48(4):742-6. PubMed ID: 18318473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]