153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27465477)
1. flowVS: channel-specific variance stabilization in flow cytometry.
Azad A; Rajwa B; Pothen A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jul; 17():291. PubMed ID: 27465477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transformation of multicolour flow cytometry data with OTflow prevents misleading multivariate analysis results and incorrect immunological conclusions.
Folcarelli R; van Staveren S; Tinnevelt G; Cadot E; Vrisekoop N; Buydens L; Koenderman L; Jansen J; van den Brink OF
Cytometry A; 2022 Jan; 101(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 34327803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimizing transformations for automated, high throughput analysis of flow cytometry data.
Finak G; Perez JM; Weng A; Gottardo R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Nov; 11():546. PubMed ID: 21050468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new "Logicle" display method avoids deceptive effects of logarithmic scaling for low signals and compensated data.
Parks DR; Roederer M; Moore WA
Cytometry A; 2006 Jun; 69(6):541-51. PubMed ID: 16604519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sometimes simpler is better: VLog, a general but easy-to-implement log-like transform for cytometry.
Bagwell CB; Hill BL; Herbert DJ; Bray CM; Hunsberger BC
Cytometry A; 2016 Dec; 89(12):1097-1105. PubMed ID: 28002657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Model-based variance-stabilizing transformation for Illumina microarray data.
Lin SM; Du P; Huber W; Kibbe WA
Nucleic Acids Res; 2008 Feb; 36(2):e11. PubMed ID: 18178591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parameter estimation for the calibration and variance stabilization of microarray data.
Huber W; von Heydebreck A; Sueltmann H; Poustka A; Vingron M
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2003; 2():Article3. PubMed ID: 16646781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mapping cell populations in flow cytometry data for cross-sample comparison using the Friedman-Rafsky test statistic as a distance measure.
Hsiao C; Liu M; Stanton R; McGee M; Qian Y; Scheuermann RH
Cytometry A; 2016 Jan; 89(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 26274018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computing the exact distribution of the Bartlett's test statistic by numerical inversion of its characteristic function.
Witkovský V
J Appl Stat; 2020; 47(13-15):2749-2764. PubMed ID: 35707430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. immunoClust--An automated analysis pipeline for the identification of immunophenotypic signatures in high-dimensional cytometric datasets.
Sörensen T; Baumgart S; Durek P; Grützkau A; Häupl T
Cytometry A; 2015 Jul; 87(7):603-15. PubMed ID: 25850678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. flowClean: Automated identification and removal of fluorescence anomalies in flow cytometry data.
Fletez-Brant K; Špidlen J; Brinkman RR; Roederer M; Chattopadhyay PK
Cytometry A; 2016 May; 89(5):461-71. PubMed ID: 26990501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. "Virtual flow cytometry" of immunostained lymphocytes on microscopic tissue slides: iHCFlow tissue cytometry.
Cualing HD; Zhong E; Moscinski L
Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2007 Jan; 72(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 17133379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variance stabilization and normalization for one-color microarray data using a data-driven multiscale approach.
Motakis ES; Nason GP; Fryzlewicz P; Rutter GA
Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(20):2547-53. PubMed ID: 16877753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Generalized unmixing model for multispectral flow cytometry utilizing nonsquare compensation matrices.
Novo D; Grégori G; Rajwa B
Cytometry A; 2013 May; 83(5):508-20. PubMed ID: 23526804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. optimalFlow: optimal transport approach to flow cytometry gating and population matching.
Del Barrio E; Inouzhe H; Loubes JM; Matrán C; Mayo-Íscar A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Oct; 21(1):479. PubMed ID: 33109072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. VSS: variance-stabilized signals for sequencing-based genomic signals.
Bayat F; Libbrecht M
Bioinformatics; 2021 Dec; 37(23):4383-4391. PubMed ID: 34165492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Immunophenotype Discovery, Hierarchical Organization, and Template-Based Classification of Flow Cytometry Samples.
Azad A; Rajwa B; Pothen A
Front Oncol; 2016; 6():188. PubMed ID: 27630823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High-throughput flow cytometry data normalization for clinical trials.
Finak G; Jiang W; Krouse K; Wei C; Sanz I; Phippard D; Asare A; De Rosa SC; Self S; Gottardo R
Cytometry A; 2014 Mar; 85(3):277-86. PubMed ID: 24382714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Per-channel basis normalization methods for flow cytometry data.
Hahne F; Khodabakhshi AH; Bashashati A; Wong CJ; Gascoyne RD; Weng AP; Seyfert-Margolis V; Bourcier K; Asare A; Lumley T; Gentleman R; Brinkman RR
Cytometry A; 2010 Feb; 77(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 19899135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A computational approach for phenotypic comparisons of cell populations in high-dimensional cytometry data.
Platon L; Pejoski D; Gautreau G; Targat B; Le Grand R; Beignon AS; Tchitchek N
Methods; 2018 Jan; 132():66-75. PubMed ID: 28917725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
