These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27465720)

  • 21. Passive leg raising for monitoring volume status and predicting fluid responsiveness.
    Kuschner WG
    Crit Care Med; 2011 Feb; 39(2):420; author reply 420. PubMed ID: 21248535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Initial resuscitation after burn injury: therapies, strategies, and controversies.
    Ahrns KS; Harkins DR
    AACN Clin Issues; 1999 Feb; 10(1):46-60. PubMed ID: 10347386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Monitoring of goal-directed fluid challenge.
    Harms MP; Secher NH; van Lieshout JJ
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):673; author reply 673-4. PubMed ID: 17251732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fluid bolus therapy: monitoring and predicting fluid responsiveness.
    Carsetti A; Cecconi M; Rhodes A
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2015 Oct; 21(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 26348418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Initial resuscitation of the severely burned adult].
    Berger MM; Chioléro R
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1998 Feb; 118(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 9553462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Goal directed fluid resuscitation decreases time for lactate clearance and facilitates early fascial closure in damage control surgery.
    Ghneim MH; Regner JL; Jupiter DC; Kang F; Bonner GL; Bready MS; Frazee R; Ciceri D; Davis ML
    Am J Surg; 2013 Dec; 206(6):995-9; discussion 999-1000. PubMed ID: 24296101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Buffered Solutions Versus Isotonic Saline for Resuscitation in Nonsurgical Critically Ill: Protocol for Cochrane Review.
    Barea-Mendoza JA; Antequera AM; Plana MN; Chico-Fernández M; Muriel A; Sáez I; Estrada-Lorenzo JM; Montejo-González JC
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1522-1524. PubMed ID: 27749340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An approach to critically ill patients.
    Rodriguez R; Hern HG
    West J Med; 2001 Dec; 175(6):392-5. PubMed ID: 11733431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hemodynamic monitoring in the critical care environment.
    Busse L; Davison DL; Junker C; Chawla LS
    Adv Chronic Kidney Dis; 2013 Jan; 20(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 23265593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A simple physiologic algorithm for managing hemodynamics using stroke volume and stroke volume variation: physiologic optimization program.
    McGee WT
    J Intensive Care Med; 2009; 24(6):352-60. PubMed ID: 19736180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tissue perfusion and oxygenation to monitor fluid responsiveness in critically ill, septic patients after initial resuscitation: a prospective observational study.
    Klijn E; van Velzen MH; Lima AP; Bakker J; van Bommel J; Groeneveld AB
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2015 Dec; 29(6):707-12. PubMed ID: 25599945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Methods of fluid administration for resuscitation and hydration under difficult circumstances: Part 2--alternative routes.
    Nanson J
    Trop Doct; 2000 Jul; 30(3):172-5. PubMed ID: 10902482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge.
    Osman D; Ridel C; Ray P; Monnet X; Anguel N; Richard C; Teboul JL
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Jan; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 17080001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Identification and resuscitation of the trauma patient in shock.
    Cocchi MN; Kimlin E; Walsh M; Donnino MW
    Emerg Med Clin North Am; 2007 Aug; 25(3):623-42, vii. PubMed ID: 17826209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of two volume responsiveness evaluation methods on fluid resuscitation and prognosis in septic shock patients.
    Xu Q; Yan J; Cai G; Chen J; Li L; Hu C
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(3):483-7. PubMed ID: 24451954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Drivers of choice of resuscitation fluid in the intensive care unit: a discrete choice experiment.
    Taylor CB; Hammond NE; Laba TL; Watts N; Thompson K; Saxena M; Micallef S; Finfer S; Myburgh J;
    Crit Care Resusc; 2017 Jun; 19(2):134-141. PubMed ID: 28651509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Synthetic colloid to intensive care patients--SAFE?].
    Perner A; Bonde J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Jun; 168(23):2265-6. PubMed ID: 16768985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Importance of intravenous fluid dose and composition in surgical ICU patients.
    Raghunathan K; McGee WT; Higgins T
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2012 Aug; 18(4):350-7. PubMed ID: 22732434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The use of current hemodynamic monitors and echocardiography in resuscitation of the critically ill or injured patient.
    Josephs SA
    Int Anesthesiol Clin; 2007; 45(3):31-59. PubMed ID: 17622829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of pulse pressure variation validity criteria in critically ill patients: a prospective observational multicentre point-prevalence study.
    Mahjoub Y; Lejeune V; Muller L; Perbet S; Zieleskiewicz L; Bart F; Veber B; Paugam-Burtz C; Jaber S; Ayham A; Zogheib E; Lasocki S; Vieillard-Baron A; Quintard H; Joannes-Boyau O; Plantefève G; Montravers P; Duperret S; Lakhdari M; Ammenouche N; Lorne E; Slama M; Dupont H
    Br J Anaesth; 2014 Apr; 112(4):681-5. PubMed ID: 24374504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.