These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27466089)

  • 1. Time to remodel the journal impact factor.
    Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7613):466. PubMed ID: 27466089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring the unmeasurable: assessing the quality of science and scientists.
    Lüscher TF
    Eur Heart J; 2018 May; 39(20):1765-1769. PubMed ID: 29788304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the impact factor and H index to assess researchers and publications.
    Thomaz PG; Assad RS; Moreira LF
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2011 Feb; 96(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 21445465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments.
    Ploegh H
    Nature; 2011 Apr; 472(7344):391. PubMed ID: 21525890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How does the journal impact factor affect the CV of PhD students?
    Sanchis-Gomar F
    EMBO Rep; 2014 Mar; 15(3):207. PubMed ID: 24473241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The counting house.
    Adam D
    Nature; 2002 Feb; 415(6873):726-9. PubMed ID: 11845174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Impact factor, its variants and its influence in academic promotion].
    Puche RC
    Medicina (B Aires); 2011; 71(5):484-9. PubMed ID: 22057180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comments on paper by Thomas et al: how to evaluate "quality of publication".
    Benchimol Barbosa PR
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2011 Jul; 97(1):87; author reply 88-9. PubMed ID: 21894398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Additional comments on the paper by Thomas et al: how to evaluate "quality of publication".
    Benchimol-Barbosa PR; Ribeiro RL; Barbosa EC
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2011 Jul; 97(1):88; author reply 88-9. PubMed ID: 21894399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Challenging the tyranny of impact factors.
    Colquhoun D
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact factors: target the funding bodies.
    Insall R
    Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):585. PubMed ID: 12789312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact factors reward and promote excellence.
    Lomnicki A
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6948):487. PubMed ID: 12891329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Citation rate unrelated to journals' impact factors.
    Waheed AA
    Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6966):495. PubMed ID: 14654813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dear DORA.
    Jacobs H
    EMBO Rep; 2013 Nov; 14(11):947. PubMed ID: 24169601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Publishing: Open to possibilities.
    Pincock S
    Nature; 2013 Mar; 495(7442):539-41. PubMed ID: 23544193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics.
    Hicks D; Wouters P; Waltman L; de Rijcke S; Rafols I
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7548):429-31. PubMed ID: 25903611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ranking lists: Open up research evaluation in China.
    Yang L
    Nature; 2016 Nov; 539(7628):168. PubMed ID: 27830785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The focus on bibliometrics makes papers less useful.
    Werner R
    Nature; 2015 Jan; 517(7534):245. PubMed ID: 25592498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Let's move beyond the rhetoric: it's time to change how we judge research.
    Curry S
    Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7691):147. PubMed ID: 29420505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A guide to the Nature Index.
    Nature; 2015 Mar; 519(7544):S75. PubMed ID: 25806700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.