BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27466315)

  • 1. Discordant relationship between Essure microinsert position and tubal occlusion.
    Hou MY
    BMJ Case Rep; 2016 Jul; 2016():. PubMed ID: 27466315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technique for the Laparoscopic Removal of Essure Microinserts.
    Mahmoud MS
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):472. PubMed ID: 26776673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography for Assessment of the Efficacy of Essure Hysteroscopic Sterilization.
    Rosič M; Žegura B; Vadnjal Đonlagić S
    J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1929-1935. PubMed ID: 29344973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One-step transvaginal three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (3D-HyFoSy) confirmation test for Essure® follow-up: a multicenter study.
    Zizolfi B; Lazzeri L; Franchini M; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Nappi C; Piccione E; Exacoustos C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):134-141. PubMed ID: 28067009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraoperative Factors that Predict the Successful Placement of Essure Microinserts.
    Arthuis CJ; Simon EG; Hébert T; Marret H
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):803-810. PubMed ID: 28390945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrast infusion sonography to assess microinsert placement and tubal occlusion after Essure.
    Connor VF
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Jun; 85(6):1791-3. PubMed ID: 16650420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incorrect position of Essure microinserts 3 months after successful bilateral placement.
    Gerritse MB; Veersema S; Timmermans A; Brölmann HA
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar; 91(3):930.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18945426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasound assessment of the Essure contraceptive devices: is three-dimensional ultrasound really needed?
    Paladini D; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Coppola C; Zizolfi B; Pastore G; Nappi C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 25241073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hysteroscopic Sterilization Device Follow-Up Rate: Hysterosalpingogram Versus Transvaginal Ultrasound.
    Jeirath N; Basinski CM; Hammond MA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):836-841. PubMed ID: 29289623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confirmation of Essure microinsert tubal coil placement with conventional and volume-contrast imaging three-dimensional ultrasound.
    Thiel JA; Suchet IB; Lortie K
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):504-8. PubMed ID: 16084897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hysterosalpingogram: an essential examination following Essure hysteroscopic sterilisation.
    Shah V; Panay N; Williamson R; Hemingway A
    Br J Radiol; 2011 Sep; 84(1005):805-12. PubMed ID: 21123309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A kink is not always a perforation: assessing Essure hysteroscopic sterilization placement.
    Borley J; Shabajee N; Tan TL
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2429.e15-7. PubMed ID: 21367412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of three-dimensional ultrasound examination classification to check the position of the tubal sterilization microinsert.
    Legendre G; Gervaise A; Levaillant JM; Faivre E; Deffieux X; Fernandez H
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Dec; 94(7):2732-5. PubMed ID: 20451183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrast infusion sonography in the post-Essure setting.
    Connor V
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 18262145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of tubal patency after essure placement.
    Rodriguez AM; Kilic GS; Vu TP; Kuo YF; Breitkopf D; Snyder RR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 23541247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Necessity of hysterosalpingography after Essure microinsert placement for contraception.
    Lazarus E; Lourenco AP; Casper S; Allen RH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jun; 198(6):1460-3. PubMed ID: 22623563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Case report of failed tubal occlusion using Essure pbc (permanent birth control) hysteroscopic sterilisation procedure.
    Karthigasu KA; Garry R; Hart R
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 46(4):365-7. PubMed ID: 16866803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Essure Permanent Birth Control, Effectiveness and Safety: An Italian 11-Year Survey.
    Franchini M; Zizolfi B; Coppola C; Bergamini V; Bonin C; Borsellino G; Busato E; Calabrese S; Calzolari S; Fantin GP; Giarrè G; Litta P; Luerti M; Mangino FP; Marchino GL; Molinari MA; Scatena E; Scrimin F; Telloli P; Di Spiezio Sardo A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(4):640-645. PubMed ID: 28232037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pregnancy after Essure placement: report of two cases.
    Moses AW; Burgis JT; Bacon JL; Risinger J
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Mar; 89(3):724.e9-11. PubMed ID: 17543963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical experience with contrast infusion sonography as an Essure confirmation test.
    Connor VF
    J Ultrasound Med; 2011 Jun; 30(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21632995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.