92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27466627)
1. Motif comparison based on similarity of binding affinity profiles.
Lambert SA; Albu M; Hughes TR; Najafabadi HS
Bioinformatics; 2016 Nov; 32(22):3504-3506. PubMed ID: 27466627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification of C2H2-ZF binding preferences from ChIP-seq data using RCADE.
Najafabadi HS; Albu M; Hughes TR
Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2879-81. PubMed ID: 25953800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved linking of motifs to their TFs using domain information.
Baumgarten N; Schmidt F; Schulz MH
Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 36(6):1655-1662. PubMed ID: 31742324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Informative priors based on transcription factor structural class improve de novo motif discovery.
Narlikar L; Gordân R; Ohler U; Hartemink AJ
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):e384-92. PubMed ID: 16873497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. RTFBSDB: an integrated framework for transcription factor binding site analysis.
Wang Z; Martins AL; Danko CG
Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 32(19):3024-6. PubMed ID: 27288497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finding de novo methylated DNA motifs.
Ngo V; Wang M; Wang W
Bioinformatics; 2019 Sep; 35(18):3287-3293. PubMed ID: 30726880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DNA familial binding profiles made easy: comparison of various motif alignment and clustering strategies.
Mahony S; Auron PE; Benos PV
PLoS Comput Biol; 2007 Mar; 3(3):e61. PubMed ID: 17397256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ProSampler: an ultrafast and accurate motif finder in large ChIP-seq datasets for combinatory motif discovery.
Li Y; Ni P; Zhang S; Li G; Su Z
Bioinformatics; 2019 Nov; 35(22):4632-4639. PubMed ID: 31070745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of ChIP-Seq Data and a Reference Motif Set for Human KRAB C2H2 Zinc Finger Proteins.
Barazandeh M; Lambert SA; Albu M; Hughes TR
G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Jan; 8(1):219-229. PubMed ID: 29146583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MAGGIE: leveraging genetic variation to identify DNA sequence motifs mediating transcription factor binding and function.
Shen Z; Hoeksema MA; Ouyang Z; Benner C; Glass CK
Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 36(Suppl_1):i84-i92. PubMed ID: 32657363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimally choosing PWM motif databases and sequence scanning approaches based on ChIP-seq data.
Dabrowski M; Dojer N; Krystkowiak I; Kaminska B; Wilczynski B
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 16():140. PubMed ID: 25927199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A widespread role of the motif environment in transcription factor binding across diverse protein families.
Dror I; Golan T; Levy C; Rohs R; Mandel-Gutfreund Y
Genome Res; 2015 Sep; 25(9):1268-80. PubMed ID: 26160164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Romulus: robust multi-state identification of transcription factor binding sites from DNase-seq data.
Jankowski A; Tiuryn J; Prabhakar S
Bioinformatics; 2016 Aug; 32(16):2419-26. PubMed ID: 27153645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. De novo motif discovery facilitates identification of interactions between transcription factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Chen MJ; Chou LC; Hsieh TT; Lee DD; Liu KW; Yu CY; Oyang YJ; Tsai HK; Chen CY
Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 28(5):701-8. PubMed ID: 22238267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identifying cooperative transcription factors in yeast using multiple data sources.
Lai FJ; Jhu MH; Chiu CC; Huang YM; Wu WS
BMC Syst Biol; 2014; 8 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S2. PubMed ID: 25559499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integrating alignment-based and alignment-free sequence similarity measures for biological sequence classification.
Borozan I; Watt S; Ferretti V
Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 31(9):1396-404. PubMed ID: 25573913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discovery and validation of information theory-based transcription factor and cofactor binding site motifs.
Lu R; Mucaki EJ; Rogan PK
Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Mar; 45(5):e27. PubMed ID: 27899659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deep and wide digging for binding motifs in ChIP-Seq data.
Kulakovskiy IV; Boeva VA; Favorov AV; Makeev VJ
Bioinformatics; 2010 Oct; 26(20):2622-3. PubMed ID: 20736340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Similarity of position frequency matrices for transcription factor binding sites.
Schones DE; Sumazin P; Zhang MQ
Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 21(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 15319260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MOCCS: Clarifying DNA-binding motif ambiguity using ChIP-Seq data.
Ozaki H; Iwasaki W
Comput Biol Chem; 2016 Aug; 63():62-72. PubMed ID: 26971251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
