These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27466774)

  • 1. Using Local Models to Improve (Q)SAR Predictivity.
    Buchwald F; Girschick T; Seeland M; Kramer S
    Mol Inform; 2011 Mar; 30(2-3):205-18. PubMed ID: 27466774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of compounds in different local structure-activity relationship environments using emerging chemical patterns.
    Namasivayam V; Gupta-Ostermann D; Balfer J; Heikamp K; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 May; 54(5):1301-10. PubMed ID: 24803014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. (Q)SAR: A Tool for the Toxicologist.
    Steinbach T; Gad-McDonald S; Kruhlak N; Powley M; Greene N
    Int J Toxicol; 2015; 34(4):352-4. PubMed ID: 25979517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Large-Scale Empirical Evaluation of Cross-Validation and External Test Set Validation in (Q)SAR.
    Gütlein M; Helma C; Karwath A; Kramer S
    Mol Inform; 2013 Jun; 32(5-6):516-28. PubMed ID: 27481669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Local and global quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling and prediction for the baseline toxicity.
    Yuan H; Wang Y; Cheng Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):159-69. PubMed ID: 17238261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Filtered circular fingerprints improve either prediction or runtime performance while retaining interpretability.
    Gütlein M; Kramer S
    J Cheminform; 2016; 8():60. PubMed ID: 27853484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A simple clustering technique to improve QSAR model selection and predictivity: application to a receptor independent 4D-QSAR analysis of cyclic urea derived inhibitors of HIV-1 protease.
    Senese CL; Hopfinger AJ
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(6):2180-93. PubMed ID: 14632470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving confidence in (Q)SAR predictions under Canada's Chemicals Management Plan - a chemical space approach.
    Kulkarni SA; Benfenati E; Barton-Maclaren TS
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2016 Oct; 27(10):851-863. PubMed ID: 27762155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nano(Q)SAR: Challenges, pitfalls and perspectives.
    Tantra R; Oksel C; Puzyn T; Wang J; Robinson KN; Wang XZ; Ma CY; Wilkins T
    Nanotoxicology; 2015; 9(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 25211549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative analysis of local and consensus quantitative structure-activity relationship approaches for the prediction of bioconcentration factor.
    Piir G; Sild S; Maran U
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2013; 24(3):175-99. PubMed ID: 23410132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integrated approach to assess the domain of applicability of some commercial (Q)SAR models.
    Kulkarni SA; Zhu J
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2008; 19(1-2):39-54. PubMed ID: 18311633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A hierarchical clustering methodology for the estimation of toxicity.
    Martin TM; Harten P; Venkatapathy R; Das S; Young DM
    Toxicol Mech Methods; 2008; 18(2-3):251-66. PubMed ID: 20020919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond synexpression relationships: local clustering of time-shifted and inverted gene expression profiles identifies new, biologically relevant interactions.
    Qian J; Dolled-Filhart M; Lin J; Yu H; Gerstein M
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Dec; 314(5):1053-66. PubMed ID: 11743722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of (Q)SAR models for predicting Ames mutagenicity of aryl azo and benzidine based compounds.
    Kulkarni SA; Barton-Maclaren TS
    J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2014; 32(1):46-82. PubMed ID: 24598040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new local-global approach for classification.
    Peres RT; Pedreira CE
    Neural Netw; 2010 Sep; 23(7):887-91. PubMed ID: 20580880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of in silico models for the identification of respiratory sensitizers.
    Dik S; Ezendam J; Cunningham AR; Carrasquer CA; van Loveren H; Rorije E
    Toxicol Sci; 2014 Dec; 142(2):385-94. PubMed ID: 25239631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Activity-aware clustering of high throughput screening data and elucidation of orthogonal structure-activity relationships.
    Lounkine E; Nigsch F; Jenkins JL; Glick M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Dec; 51(12):3158-68. PubMed ID: 22098146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative PBT screening using (Q)SAR tools within REACH legislation.
    Zachary M; Greenway GM
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2009; 20(1-2):145-57. PubMed ID: 19343589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hierarchical clustering algorithm for comprehensive orthologous-domain classification in multiple genomes.
    Uchiyama I
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2006; 34(2):647-58. PubMed ID: 16436801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Local lazy regression: making use of the neighborhood to improve QSAR predictions.
    Guha R; Dutta D; Jurs PC; Chen T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(4):1836-47. PubMed ID: 16859315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.