These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Pharmacokinetic comparison of a once-daily and twice-daily theophylline delivery system. González MA; Kisicki J; Straughn AB Clin Ther; 1994; 16(4):686-92. PubMed ID: 7982257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pharmacokinetics of an extended-release theophylline product in cats. Guenther-Yenke CL; McKiernan BC; Papich MG; Powell E J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2007 Sep; 231(6):900-6. PubMed ID: 17867974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Oral bioavailability of slow-release theophylline from unencapsulated beads in preschool children with chronic asthma. Vaughan LM; Milavetz G; Weinberger MM; Smith GD; Harris JB Ther Drug Monit; 1988; 10(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 3059587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The rise and fall of serum theophylline concentration: a comparison of sustained-release formulations in volunteers with rapid theophylline clearance. Mucklow JC; Kuhn S Br J Clin Pharmacol; 1985 Dec; 20(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 4091990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pharmacokinetic disposition of an immediate-release aminophylline and a sustained-release theophylline formulation in the horse. Goetz TE; Munsiff IJ; McKiernan BC J Vet Pharmacol Ther; 1989 Dec; 12(4):369-77. PubMed ID: 2614856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The consistency of theophylline absorption from a sustained-release formulation in asthmatic children. Hill M; Haltom JR; Szefler SJ Pharmacotherapy; 1988; 8(5):277-83. PubMed ID: 3255299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of aminophylline and theophylline sustained-release formulations by their bioavailability and steady-state serum levels. Steinijans VW; Zech K; Fischer R Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1983 Dec; 21(12):624-30. PubMed ID: 6668100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Theophylline absorption from two sustained-release products. Implications for therapeutic drug monitoring. Rogers RJ; Wiener MB; Hill MR; Szefler SJ Am Rev Respir Dis; 1987 Nov; 136(5):1168-73. PubMed ID: 3674579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Apparent inconsistent theophylline absorption from sustained release capsules. Uden DL; Schaber DE; Wyatt RA Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1987 Jun; 26(6):285-7. PubMed ID: 3581636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Theophylline QID, TID, BID and now QD? A report on 24-hour dosing with slow-release theophylline formulations with emphasis on analyses of data used to obtain Food and Drug Administration approval for Theo-24. Weinberger MM Pharmacotherapy; 1984; 4(4):181-98. PubMed ID: 6483637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Once-a-day dosing with theophylline: a comparison of four sustained-release products. Minotti DA; Altman LC; Ayars GH; Popick FR; Benn VJ Ann Allergy; 1992 Jun; 68(6):500-6. PubMed ID: 1610026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative bioavailability of two sustained-release theophylline formulations in the dog. Mengozzi G; Intorre L; Bertini S; Giorgi M; Soldani G Pharmacol Res; 1998 Dec; 38(6):481-5. PubMed ID: 9990658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative steady-state bioavailability of sustained-release theophylline preparations: Theo-Dur, Uni-Dur and Xanthium. Rojanasthien N; Kovjiriyapan K; Manorot M; Pothirat C Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol; 2001 Jun; 19(2):69-78. PubMed ID: 11699723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of two extended-release theophylline formulations in dogs. Bach JE; Kukanich B; Papich MG; McKiernan BC J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2004 Apr; 224(7):1113-9. PubMed ID: 15074856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]