BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27468327)

  • 1. Women's Experiences of Inaccurate Breast Cancer Screening Results: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis.
    Health Quality Ontario
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2016; 16(16):1-22. PubMed ID: 27468327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perspectives on mammography after receipt of secondary screening owing to a false positive.
    Thomson MD; Siminoff LA
    Womens Health Issues; 2015; 25(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 25648490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic review on women's values and preferences concerning breast cancer screening and diagnostic services.
    Mathioudakis AG; Salakari M; Pylkkanen L; Saz-Parkinson Z; Bramesfeld A; Deandrea S; Lerda D; Neamtiu L; Pardo-Hernandez H; Solà I; Alonso-Coello P
    Psychooncology; 2019 May; 28(5):939-947. PubMed ID: 30812068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A roller coaster of emotions and sense--coping with the perceived psychosocial consequences of a false-positive screening mammography.
    Bolejko A; Zackrisson S; Hagell P; Wann-Hansson C
    J Clin Nurs; 2014 Jul; 23(13-14):2053-62. PubMed ID: 24313329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms.
    Brewer NT; Salz T; Lillie SE
    Ann Intern Med; 2007 Apr; 146(7):502-10. PubMed ID: 17404352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How Do Women View Risk-Based Mammography Screening? A Qualitative Study.
    He X; Schifferdecker KE; Ozanne EM; Tosteson ANA; Woloshin S; Schwartz LM
    J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Nov; 33(11):1905-1912. PubMed ID: 30066118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of false-positives and women's characteristics on long-term adherence to breast cancer screening.
    Román R; Sala M; De La Vega M; Natal C; Galceran J; González-Román I; Baroja A; Zubizarreta R; Ascunce N; Salas D; Castells X
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Nov; 130(2):543-52. PubMed ID: 21617920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk.
    Glechner A; Wagner G; Mitus JW; Teufer B; Klerings I; Böck N; Grillich L; Berzaczy D; Helbich TH; Gartlehner G
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Mar; 3(3):CD009632. PubMed ID: 36999589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic review of the psychological consequences of false-positive screening mammograms.
    Bond M; Pavey T; Welch K; Cooper C; Garside R; Dean S; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Mar; 17(13):1-170, v-vi. PubMed ID: 23540978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.
    Nelson HD; Pappas M; Cantor A; Griffin J; Daeges M; Humphrey L
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):256-67. PubMed ID: 26756737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experiences of recall after mammography screening--a qualitative study.
    Solbjør M; Forsmo S; Skolbekken JA; Sætnan AR
    Health Care Women Int; 2011 Nov; 32(11):1009-27. PubMed ID: 21978146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adjunct ultrasonography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk: a systematic review.
    Gartlehner G; Thaler KJ; Chapman A; Kaminski A; Berzaczy D; Van Noord MG; Helbich TH
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2013 Jun; 11(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 23750571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "You probably can't feel as safe as normal women": Hispanic women's reactions to breast density notification.
    Pacsi-Sepulveda AL; Shelton RC; Rodriguez CB; Coq AT; Tehranifar P
    Cancer; 2019 Jun; 125(12):2049-2056. PubMed ID: 30768781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross sectional survey.
    Schwartz LM; Woloshin S; Sox HC; Fischhoff B; Welch HG
    BMJ; 2000 Jun; 320(7250):1635-40. PubMed ID: 10856064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Health Quality Ontario
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2016; 16(15):1-71. PubMed ID: 27468326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of information about overdetection of breast cancer on women's decision-making about mammography screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Hersch J; Barratt A; Jansen J; Houssami N; Irwig L; Jacklyn G; Dhillon H; Thornton H; McGeechan K; Howard K; McCaffery K
    BMJ Open; 2014 May; 4(5):e004990. PubMed ID: 24833692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Women's anxieties caused by false positives in mammography screening: a contingent valuation survey.
    Yasunaga H; Ide H; Imamura T; Ohe K
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jan; 101(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 16821083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Women's perceptions of breast cancer screening. Spanish screening programme survey.
    Baena-Cañada JM; Rosado-Varela P; Expósito-Álvarez I; González-Guerrero M; Nieto-Vera J; Benítez-Rodríguez E
    Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):883-8. PubMed ID: 25456103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Older women's experience with a benign breast biopsy—a mixed methods study.
    Schonberg MA; Silliman RA; Ngo LH; Birdwell RL; Fein-Zachary V; Donato J; Marcantonio ER
    J Gen Intern Med; 2014 Dec; 29(12):1631-40. PubMed ID: 25138983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.