347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27468594)
1. Changes in mandibular position in treated Class II division 2 malocclusions in growing and non-growing subjects.
AL-Nimri K; Abo-Zomor M; Alomari S
Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 27468594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.
Takriti M; Dashash M
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.
Hanandeh BA; El-Bialy AA
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The mandibular response in Class II malocclusions correction.
Cordua T; Deli R; Giuliante L; Ursini R
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(3):31-9. PubMed ID: 22031992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment effects of a fixed intermaxillary device to correct class II malocclusions in growing patients.
Heinrichs DA; Shammaa I; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):45. PubMed ID: 25138988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of skeletal changes between female adolescents and adults with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion after orthodontic treatment.
Ding Y; Zhao JH; Deng JR; Wang XJ
Chin J Dent Res; 2012; 15(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 23509835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Post-treatment evaluation of a magnetic activator device in Class II high-angle malocclusions.
Yüksel S; Kaygisiz E; Ulusoy C; Keykubat A
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 20053717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of differential growth and orthodontic treatment outcome by regional cephalometric superpositions.
Efstratiadis SS; Cohen G; Ghafari J
Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 10371427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.
Isik F; Nalbantgil D; Sayinsu K; Arun T
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Centroid analysis of twin-block appliance treatment for Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
Trenouth MJ
World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 16779975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maintenance of a deep bite prior to surgical mandibular advancement.
de Coul FO; Oosterkamp BC; Jansma J; Bierman MW; Pruim GJ; Sandham A
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 19737779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clarifying the mechanism of effect of the Bionator for treatment of maxillary protrusion: A percentile growth study.
Oda H; Sandou M; Lin CM; Kamata M; Kawata T
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):213-219. PubMed ID: 27759410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Glenoid fossa position in Class II malocclusion associated with mandibular retrusion.
Giuntini V; De Toffol L; Franchi L; Baccetti T
Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):808-12. PubMed ID: 18298205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Pilot Study on the Dentoalveolar and Skeletal Effects of Two Functional Appliances in Class II, Division 1 Growing Children.
Chen H; Yagi K; Almeida FR; Pliska BT; Lowe AA
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015; 26(2):15-20. PubMed ID: 26349284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Base of the skull morphology and Class III malocclusion in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
Tinano MM; Martins MA; Bendo CB; Mazzieiro Ê
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 25741829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of zigzag elastics in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion subjects with hypo- and hyperdivergent growth patterns. A pilot study.
Aras A; Cinsar A; Bulut H
Eur J Orthod; 2001 Aug; 23(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 11544789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shape-coordinate and tensor analysis of skeletal changes in children with treated Class III malocclusions.
Baccetti T; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Dec; 112(6):622-33. PubMed ID: 9423694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of mandibular tongue cribs on dentoskeletal changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusions.
Meibodi SE; Meybodi SA; Meybodi EM
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 20209173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cranial base features in skeletal Class III patients.
Proff P; Will F; Bokan I; Fanghänel J; Gedrange T
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 18416608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
