These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27468594)

  • 1. Changes in mandibular position in treated Class II division 2 malocclusions in growing and non-growing subjects.
    AL-Nimri K; Abo-Zomor M; Alomari S
    Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 27468594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.
    Takriti M; Dashash M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.
    Hanandeh BA; El-Bialy AA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The mandibular response in Class II malocclusions correction.
    Cordua T; Deli R; Giuliante L; Ursini R
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(3):31-9. PubMed ID: 22031992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment effects of a fixed intermaxillary device to correct class II malocclusions in growing patients.
    Heinrichs DA; Shammaa I; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):45. PubMed ID: 25138988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of skeletal changes between female adolescents and adults with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion after orthodontic treatment.
    Ding Y; Zhao JH; Deng JR; Wang XJ
    Chin J Dent Res; 2012; 15(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 23509835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Post-treatment evaluation of a magnetic activator device in Class II high-angle malocclusions.
    Yüksel S; Kaygisiz E; Ulusoy C; Keykubat A
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 20053717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of differential growth and orthodontic treatment outcome by regional cephalometric superpositions.
    Efstratiadis SS; Cohen G; Ghafari J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 10371427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.
    Isik F; Nalbantgil D; Sayinsu K; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Centroid analysis of twin-block appliance treatment for Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Trenouth MJ
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 16779975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maintenance of a deep bite prior to surgical mandibular advancement.
    de Coul FO; Oosterkamp BC; Jansma J; Bierman MW; Pruim GJ; Sandham A
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 19737779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clarifying the mechanism of effect of the Bionator for treatment of maxillary protrusion: A percentile growth study.
    Oda H; Sandou M; Lin CM; Kamata M; Kawata T
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):213-219. PubMed ID: 27759410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Glenoid fossa position in Class II malocclusion associated with mandibular retrusion.
    Giuntini V; De Toffol L; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):808-12. PubMed ID: 18298205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Pilot Study on the Dentoalveolar and Skeletal Effects of Two Functional Appliances in Class II, Division 1 Growing Children.
    Chen H; Yagi K; Almeida FR; Pliska BT; Lowe AA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015; 26(2):15-20. PubMed ID: 26349284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of zigzag elastics in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion subjects with hypo- and hyperdivergent growth patterns. A pilot study.
    Aras A; Cinsar A; Bulut H
    Eur J Orthod; 2001 Aug; 23(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 11544789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shape-coordinate and tensor analysis of skeletal changes in children with treated Class III malocclusions.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Dec; 112(6):622-33. PubMed ID: 9423694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of mandibular tongue cribs on dentoskeletal changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusions.
    Meibodi SE; Meybodi SA; Meybodi EM
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 20209173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cranial base features in skeletal Class III patients.
    Proff P; Will F; Bokan I; Fanghänel J; Gedrange T
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 18416608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mandibular growth comparisons of Class I and Class II division 1 skeletofacial patterns.
    Jacob HB; Buschang PH
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):755-61. PubMed ID: 24524578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.