These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27469105)

  • 21. Non-Invasive, Temporally Discrete Feedback of Object Contact and Release Improves Grasp Control of Closed-Loop Myoelectric Transradial Prostheses.
    Clemente F; D'Alonzo M; Controzzi M; Edin BB; Cipriani C
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 Dec; 24(12):1314-1322. PubMed ID: 26584497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perception and control of low cable operation forces in voluntary closing body-powered upper-limb prostheses.
    Hichert M; Abbink DA; Vardy AN; van der Sluis CK; Janssen WGM; Brouwers MAH; Plettenburg DH
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0225263. PubMed ID: 31756222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. High Cable Forces Deteriorate Pinch Force Control in Voluntary-Closing Body-Powered Prostheses.
    Hichert M; Abbink DA; Kyberd PJ; Plettenburg DH
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169996. PubMed ID: 28099454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The DEKA Arm: its features, functionality, and evolution during the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):492-504. PubMed ID: 24150930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Cable-actuated Prosthetic Emulator for Transradial Amputees.
    Poddar S; Cummiskey D; Kang J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():4529-4532. PubMed ID: 34892224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The DEKA hand: A multifunction prosthetic terminal device-patterns of grip usage at home.
    Resnik L; Acluche F; Borgia M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Aug; 42(4):446-454. PubMed ID: 28914583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Intraneural sensory feedback restores grip force control and motor coordination while using a prosthetic hand.
    Clemente F; Valle G; Controzzi M; Strauss I; Iberite F; Stieglitz T; Granata G; Rossini PM; Petrini F; Micera S; Cipriani C
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):026034. PubMed ID: 30736030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Locomotor Adaptation by Transtibial Amputees Walking With an Experimental Powered Prosthesis Under Continuous Myoelectric Control.
    Huang S; Wensman JP; Ferris DP
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 May; 24(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 26057851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biomechanics principle of elbow joint for transhumeral prostheses: comparison of normal hand, body-powered, myoelectric & air splint prostheses.
    Abd Razak NA; Abu Osman NA; Gholizadeh H; Ali S
    Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Sep; 13():134. PubMed ID: 25208636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to upper limb amputees.
    Kejlaa GH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Dec; 17(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 8134275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Design and evaluation of two different finger concepts for body-powered prosthetic hand.
    Smit G; Plettenburg DH; van der Helm FC
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(9):1253-66. PubMed ID: 24458965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Golf hand prosthesis performance of transradial amputees.
    Carey SL; Wernke MM; Lura DJ; Kahle JT; Dubey RV; Highsmith MJ
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Jun; 39(3):244-9. PubMed ID: 24570019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sensor fusion and computer vision for context-aware control of a multi degree-of-freedom prosthesis.
    Markovic M; Dosen S; Popovic D; Graimann B; Farina D
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Dec; 12(6):066022. PubMed ID: 26529274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Design and Fabrication of a Six Degree-of-Freedom Open Source Hand.
    Krausz NE; Rorrer RA; Weir RF
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 May; 24(5):562-72. PubMed ID: 26087495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses.
    Stein RB; Walley M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1983 Jun; 64(6):243-8. PubMed ID: 6860093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Compensatory movements of transradial prosthesis users during common tasks.
    Carey SL; Jason Highsmith M; Maitland ME; Dubey RV
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Nov; 23(9):1128-35. PubMed ID: 18675497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The use of an adjustable electrode housing unit to compare electrode alignment and contact variation with myoelectric prosthesis functionality: A pilot study.
    Head JS; Howard D; Hutchins SW; Kenney L; Heath GH; Aksenov AY
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 25134531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Categorization of compensatory motions in transradial myoelectric prosthesis users.
    Hussaini A; Zinck A; Kyberd P
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):286-293. PubMed ID: 27473642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Robotic lower limb prosthesis design through simultaneous computer optimizations of human and prosthesis costs.
    Handford ML; Srinivasan M
    Sci Rep; 2016 Feb; 6():19983. PubMed ID: 26857747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Efficiency of voluntary closing hand and hook prostheses.
    Smit G; Plettenburg DH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Dec; 34(4):411-27. PubMed ID: 20849359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.